chevss454
Data-driven decision-making is science and art.
Belichick told Mike Reiss yesterday that his board had just fewer than 100 players on it. Staying true to form.
Been a long time since I was in Vietnam, but I do remember that they did not pronounce their names the same way we did, and there were a lot of tonals, almost like softly signing instead of speaking.What about "Nguyen" sounding like "nWin"?
And who was the person that decided that is how a Vietnamese name should be spelled?
Belichick told Mike Reiss yesterday that his board had just fewer than 100 players on it. Staying true to form.
I'd pay good money to get a look at that list.
As much for who they aren't interested in as who they are.
It's just group of five = AAC, C-USA, MAC, MWC and Sun Belt.That list of best pass blocking tackles does not include the potential first rounders, Willams, Dillard, Risner?:shrug_n:
It's just group of five = AAC, C-USA, MAC, MWC and Sun Belt.
PFF's most underrated prospects for the 2019 NFL Draft
These are the players who haven’t received a ton of first-round hype that we’d have no problem with drafting within the first 32 picks.
WR J.J. Arcega-Whiteside, Stanford
If you only watch Arcega-Whiteside’s highlights, you’d get the impression that he struggles to separate. In Stanford’s offense though, that was almost by design. They only threw go routes as back-shoulder fades, and they had him literally post up on defenders in the end zone — which resulted in seven touchdowns. The wideout’s route tree simply wasn’t conducive to separating. He is elite in contested situations (he led the draft class in each of the past two seasons) and he is money where it matters most. No receiver in college football last year had a higher receiving grade than Arcega-Whiteside’s 90.6 on third and fourth downs.
Edge Chase Winovich, Michigan
Outside of his age (already 24), I’m not sure what there is to dislike about Winovich as a prospect. His 92.3 overall grade over the past two seasons is the fourth-highest of any edge defender in their last two college seasons that we’ve ever seen.
All Winovich did on the football field at Michigan was disrupt opposing offenses week after week. He earned a 92.3 overall grade over the last two seasons. Below is the full list of the Power 5 players who have earned a grade as good or better their last two seasons since we started grading:
Nick Bosa
Myles Garrett (tie)
Joey Bosa
That’s it. At the combine, he blazed an absurd 10-time (1.59) and three-cone (6.94) for a 256-pound edge. Elite production combined with elite athleticism is usually a good recipe for success on the edge. If you like production, Winovich is as good as it gets on the edge after Nick Bosa in this draft class
WR Andy Isabella, Massachusetts
When evaluators see Isabella’s stature, they’re usually quick to pigeonhole him in the slot. The UMass receiver gets the ‘undersized’ label, but that’s not the case. He’s short, he’s not small; 188 pounds is rock solid for a 5-foot-9 receiver. He’ll be able to play through contact far better than a 6-foot-4, 200-pound receiver because Isabella is far more dense at his height and weight. That showed on tape too. Even on reps where he got jammed cleanly, Isabella could still stack corners and separate down the field. With 4.31 speed, once Isabella gets a step, the defender is not making it back up.
CB David Long, Michigan
Long’s issues are obvious. He’s undersized at a shade below 5-foot-11 and pretty much exclusively played man coverage at Michigan. Projecting forward, bigger receivers in the NFL and more diverse schemes could be an issue. However ‘could’ is the keyword. In the role Long was asked to execute at Michigan, he had almost no chinks in his armor and he allowed nine catches the entire season. Long is a lock-down man coverage corner who simply doesn’t have the expected lock-down man size.
S Darnell Savage, Maryland
Savage offers as many tools to work with as any safety in this draft class, and the encouraging thing about him is that we’ve already seen it translate to production for multiple seasons at Maryland.
C Elgton Jenkins, Mississippi State
The one trait I value above all others along the offensive line is balance. The elite linemen in the NFL almost never finish plays flat on their face (unless they brought the defender with them). It rears its head in a number of different aspects that go into offensive line play (pass sets, location in space, etc.). For my money, Jenkins has the best balance of any interior lineman in the draft class — and it showed up in the data a number of different ways. In pass protection, he allowed all of five pressures this past season and only 19 over the last three years. It also showed up with Jenkins getting flagged once all last season, and on that play (a hold against Louisiana Tech), we didn’t even downgrade him as we saw it as a clean pancake. Combine that with ideal size for either center or guard and you’ve got a first-round grade.
T Greg Little, Ole Miss
It’s almost hard to believe that a 21-year-old who started three years at left tackle in the SEC and allowed only 46 pressures over that span is being included in an article about underrated players. Especially one who figures to stay at tackle at 6-foot-5 with 35-plus inch arms with the requisite athleticism. The obvious reason is his work, or lack thereof, in the run game where he earned a 63.2 grade a season ago. No matter, give me Little’s smooth pass sets and advanced hand usage any day. To add some icing on the cake, Little has also been one of the most disciplined linemen in the class with six career penalties and only one last season.
DI Jerry Tillery, Notre Dame
Tillery isn’t quite in the same boat as the rest of the guys on the list because he’s landing in the first round of most mocks. I included him though because we are still so much higher on him than that. Tillery is a top-10 player on our draft board, and I’ve gone on record saying I wouldn’t criticize the Bucs if they drafted him at No. 5 overall. I can’t for the life of me see the on-field reasons why DeForest Buckner was a top-10 lock back in 2016 and Tillery isn’t considered the same. Tillery had a higher pass-rushing grade (92.5 vs. 84.7) while Tillery tested out better in every single drill at the combine except for broad jump, where the difference was an inch (9-7 vs. 9-8). Someone’s going to get a steal in Tillery.
==================================
The more tape I watch on JJAW the higher he climbs on my board of WRs for the Patriots. He's a possession machine, he wins easily on contested catches, gets a solid 16.8 avg yds/catch and his 135 overall receiver passer rating ranks 2nd in this very solid class or WRs. The Pats will like that but they'll like this even more. In clutch situations, on third and fourth downs, he caught 95.2% of his catchable targets and recorded 12 explosive plays (20+ yards) which puts him #1 of this class in that category. His body control and skill at boxing out comes from his basketball background and relentless practice. When I read that Stanford had players stand in the end zone and hit him with bags, pull on him, hit him, do everything they could to make it impossible for him to come down with the ball in practice I realized he's definitely included as a Patriot kind of guy.
I've also come around on Isabella who has been a difficult evaluation. He's short but he’s not small; 188 pounds is rock solid for a 5-foot-9 receiver. He should be able to play through contact far better than a 6-foot-4, 200-pound receiver because he's far more dense at his height and weight. That showed on tape too. On reps where he got jammed cleanly, Isabella could still stack corners and separate down the field. With 4.31 speed, once Isabella gets a step, the defender is not making it back up. My worry on Isabella has always been getting a free release from the LOS when he's lined up outside against NFL CBs. I'd draft him and be confident in leaving that up to McD to figure out by scheme. I still think he's drafted long before BB is pulling the trigger on him.
Everybody keeps talking up Tillery, but I watched Notre Dame several times last year and even though I was aware that he was a top prospect he did little to make me notice him.
Contrast that with Wilkins of Clemson and you can't go a set of downs without him shredding somebody.
I get that is an unscientific way to look at it, but that's how I, and a lot of people, percieve college players. Do something to demand the attention of the observer. I don't want Tillery here unless it's after the 2nd.
Everybody keeps talking up Tillery, but I watched Notre Dame several times last year and even though I was aware that he was a top prospect he did little to make me notice him.
Contrast that with Wilkins of Clemson and you can't go a set of downs without him shredding somebody.
I get that is an unscientific way to look at it, but that's how I, and a lot of people, percieve college players. Do something to demand the attention of the observer. I don't want Tillery here unless it's after the 2nd.
I'd pay good money to get a look at that list.
As much for who they aren't interested in as who they are.