No such thing as a post June 1 designation for a trade. That's only for releases.I can't imagine any deal that is finalized won't be a post-June 1xt designation. The Eagles aren't taking that kind of a bath.
No such thing as a post June 1 designation for a trade. That's only for releases.I can't imagine any deal that is finalized won't be a post-June 1xt designation. The Eagles aren't taking that kind of a bath.
That's why the trade has to wait for June 2nd to be made.No such thing as a post June 1 designation for a trade. That's only for releases.
You're right, poor phrasing. What I mean is, if they trade him before June 1st, it's a $43M cap hit. If they trade him after June 1st, it's about $16M.No such thing as a post June 1 designation for a trade. That's only for releases.
Then $37M off the 2027 cap, right? Break it into chunks to make it more manageable? Unless you're Stephen Ross and want to destroy your team for a year to make tanking look more plausible?You're right, poor phrasing. What I mean is, if they trade him before June 1st, it's a $43M cap hit. If they trade him after June 1st, it's about $16M.
I heard a podcaster give an opinion on the draftability of "Dixon Miaz" the other day because he didn't want to admit he didn't know the player.FYI -
The reason these a-holes don't get banned is because they cross their t's and dot their i's by disclosing they are a parody account.
View attachment 39118
Found it!I heard a podcaster give an opinion on the draftability of "Dixon Miaz" the other day because he didn't want to admit he didn't know the player.
That said, it is true that if the Patriots had Dixon Miaz it would be the start of a whole new relationship with the team for me.
