I can't speak for HS, but the point is probably that there are QBs in the NFL other than Brady who are capable of having success and winning games. Brady is really good, the best ever because of his incredibly consistency, longevity, and everything mental/physical he does. I love him to death. But he didn't wave a wand to make his teams (or himself) great. It took a lot of hard work, execution, and talent from many people.
Brady did a lot more in that 24-point comeback than Jones did in that complete debacle against the Bills.
Not sure I agree with this. Less of a slight at Brady - he had a good, not great game. But I thought Mac had a very impressive performance against Buffalo all things considered. The second INT was a questionable decision but beyond that, he had a good game, and specifically showed improvement regarding footwork, mechanics, weight transfer, and knowing when to drive the ball as opposed to putting touch on it. I felt as positive about Mac's future as ever after that game.
Not the game to dance on Brady's grave. It took a lot of balls and determination to tie that game. The defensive call on that last play was colossally stupid and cost the Bucs a shot at OT.
This statement is ironic in light of your Mac slander after the Buffalo game. I would say the same to you: Not the game to dance on Mac's grave. His performance, in the bitter cold, on the road, facing a darn good defense, took a lot of balls and determination. He didn't pack it in, he kept fighting like hell until the end of the game, and if the defense had been semi-competent Mac may have given them a shot to get back in it. Reiss said that was one of Mac's better games of the season and he was one of the top competitors that night; I wholly agree with Reiss.
A helpful tip: Brady slander doesn't really exist here. There is no Patriots fan in their right mind who would slander that man. What does exist is some pushback against the narrative that Brady is the sole, exclusive reason for the Patriots' 20 years of unprecedented success; pushback against the notion that Belichick isn't any good at his job and was carried entirely by Brady; pushback against the notion that Brady, by his mere presence, can magically transform a team into a champion; pushback against the notion that other roles on the team, be it any of the other 52 players, or coaching staff, or personnel management, are meaningless and the only thing that matters is having some magical QB.
I guess that's what happens when you've been part of a community for fewer than two weeks and thrust yourself into conversations in a pugnacious manner, without taking the time to get a feel for the lay of the land, or making any effort to find common ground / form connections with other posters based on mutual goodwill. There are some people on this forum with whom I disagree but generally we are still good natured and get along despite those disagreements (be it related to football, politics, favorite Thanksgiving dish, etc). It's becoming apparent that mutual goodwill isn't on your agenda.