The Rams had no interest so LA announced Wed. that they would pick up some of his salary to get a deal done.
I like the player but his contract is what it is. Even if the Rams ate half, is he a player worthy of a ~$10 mil/year investment? Not sure he is but the Pats certainly have the cap room to roll the dice.
My main issue is that when I view this player, he's no more than a #2 and he is best suited in the slot. So to add him to a team that already has a collection of #3's and #4's who are arguably best suited in the slot doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
Having a fully healthy, 32 year-old Kupp may yield around 80 receptions/900 yards, but the same 40-60 receptions we saw from the 2024 cast of WR (Pop's stats being their
ceiling), and perhaps the same TE production (for which I have no complaints about).
Now, add a healthy 26 year-old Tee Higgins to to the Patriots and he is likely good for 75-80/1,100-1,200 and about 10 TDs. I'd argue that the same cast of WR's would then elevate to a
floor to what production Pop Douglas gave them this year. So that's a 1,000 WR and multiple 600+ WR's. For what it would cost to add a player like Higgins, the elevation of the rest of the cast around him is well worth the ROI there.
Obviously all of this is based on pre-draft consideration but as we stand right now, I don't think the addition of Kupp nets this team additional wins.
At the end of the day, I see LA cutting Kupp. If that happens, I am interested.