Durham Investigation

Dwight Schrute

Deplorable #63174288
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
40,803
Reaction score
4,301
Points
113
Age
53
Location
America?s Hometown
Don’t ya love how they’re a 501c-3 supposedly non political yet it’s a farm for Dims?

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...n-steeles-primary-source-triggers-focus-think

Revelation of Steele’s primary source triggers focus on think tank tied to Clinton, Biden

The revelation that Christopher Steele’s primary sub-source for his dossier was an American resident tied to a liberal think tank close to the Obama administration has triggered new investigative interest.

The identification of Igor Danchenko as Steele’s subsource — reported by Real Clear Politics and then confirmed by Danchenko's lawyer to the New York Times — means Steele’s dossier relied on someone who wasn't based in Russia despite claims to the contrary by the FBI.

In at least two of the applications for its Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant targeting Trump adviser Carter Page, the FBI referred to the primary sub-source of the document as "truthful and cooperative" and "Russian-based," according to Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz's report last December.

DOJ IG report on Russia FISAs
Danchenko also worked for several years until 2010 at the Brookings Institution, a think tank familiar to many in the Obama administration and to one key witness in the impeachment proceedings against President Trump.

Fiona Hill, a Russia expert at the National Security Council and an impeachment witness against Trump, worked at the Brookings Institution in 2016 and co-authored a paper with Danchenko prior to the dossier being assembled, according to Real Clear Politics.

In addition, the president of the Brookings Institution — former Clinton administration figure Strobe Talbott — contacted Steele early in the Russia collusion probe and requested a copy of his dossier to share with Obama administration officials, according to Steele's recent testimony in a British lawsuit.

SteeleRiceTalbottTestimony.pdf
"I remember taking a phone call from him, your Lordship, earlier in the summer, in which he said that he was aware that I had — he spoke in fairly cryptic terms, but he was aware that we had material of relevance to the U.S. election," Steele testified in March in the British lawsuit.

Steele claimed Talbott learned about his dossier work from either former National Security Adviser Susan Rice or former Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland. Rice's spokesman has denied having such contact about the dossier. Nuland acknowledged knowing about Steele's dossier in July 2016 and claimed she directed her staff to send the former MI-6 agent to the FBI.

"Although he didn't state it explicitly, one or either or both of them had briefed him on the work we had been doing," Steele testified.

Talbott’s brother-in-law, Cody Shearer, distributed his own anti-Trump Russia dossier in September 2016, according to evidence released by Congress and the DOJ inspector general. It included some of the same allegations as those in Steele’s.

And then in early 2017 Talbott provided a copy of the Steele dossier to Hill after she started working inside the Trump National Security Council, according to Hill’s impeachment testimony. Hill admitted she met multiple times with Steele in 2016.

The sudden web of connections between Danchenko, Hill, Talbott and others inside Brookings has spurred Republicans to start investigating the think tank, a 501c 3 tax-exempt organization.

"It looks like there were a lot of connections to the Brookings Institute," said former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, one of the first members of Congress to help unravel the failings and abuses in the now-discredited Russia collusion investigation.

Nunes told Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo that he is opening a "full-blown" probe into the role Brookings and its figures played with Steele and the entire Russia episode.

"People may remember the president of Brookings back in 2016, we know that he had given the dossier to a few people, we had that through testimony," Nunes explained. "You also may remember that the State Department was involved and there were additional dossiers that weren't the Steele dossiers, except that they mirrored the Steele dossiers."

"And we think there is a connection between the president of Brookings and those dossiers that were given to the State Department that mirrored the Steele dossiers," he continued.

The links between Obama, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton and Brookings run deep.

Talbot worked as a deputy secretary of state for Bill Clinton and in 2011 was named by then-Secretary of State Clinton to be chairman of the new Foreign Affairs Policy Board. He was reported to be on a short list of candidates for a senior government job if Mrs. Clinton won the 2016 election. He left Brookings in 2017 after 15 years as its president.

Arne Duncan, Obama's former Education Secretary, serves at Brookings along with several other alumni, such as former Obama Treasury official Stephanie Aaronson, former DOJ official Bill Baer and former State and NSC official Emily Horne.

Joe Biden gave one of his first speeches as he was considering a run for the 2020 election at Brookings back in 2018, where he was introduced glowingly by former Gen. John Allen as "a true champion of the American people and certainly the middle class."

While he was vice president he gave a whopping four speeches at Brookings. And he has plucked some of his key advisers from among past and present members of the think tank, including former Deputy CIA Director Avril Haines and, back in 2014, economic adviser Ben Harris.
 

AkPatsFan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
6,655
Reaction score
740
Points
113
Location
Eagle River, Ak
Not sure what to make of this but if it's true, shit is going to hit the fan.

Strzok working with Durham: Flips on Brennan, Comey, and Obama

WASHINGTON, DC: Former FBI agent Peter Strzok is cooperating and working with the John Durham probe of the origins of the Russia Hoax, investigative reporter Adam Housley reports. If true, it would be a bombshell development in the investigation of the criminal conspiracy against Donald Trump.

Strzok would be a key witness against higher-ups at the FBI, the intelligence community, and the White House. He is at the center of both the Hillary Clinton exoneration and the origins of the Russia Hoax. He and Andrew Weissmann started Crossfire Hurricane. They used the Brennan Mifsud frame job of George Papadopoulos and the Steele Dossier to obtain fraudulent FISA warrants.

Adam Housley breaks the story
Adam Housley, an award winner former Fox News reporter tweeted on July 23rd: “Being told that Peter Strzok is talking with investigators”

Multiple sources: Strzok is working with investigators. He isn’t the only one.


— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) July 24, 2020


Soon after Housley then tweeted: “Multiple sources: Strzok is working with investigators. He isn’t the only one.”

Being told that Peter Strozk is talking with investigators

— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) July 23, 2020

He isn’t the only one. Let that sink in for a moment.

Yesterday, on Sunday’s with Maria Bartiromo, Sen. Lindsey Graham revealed that he will be shortly releasing evidence that the “FBI lied their ass off” to Congress regarding the Steele dossier.

“Here is what I think I’m going to be able to show to the public. Not only did the FBI lie to the court about the reliability about the Steele dossier, they also lied to the Congress. That’s a separate crime.”
On July 17, Graham, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released a declassified FBI memo further undercutting the credibility of the dossier.



“We also now have found this, and this will come out next week, that Congress got suspicious about the Russian subsource and the reliability of the Steele dossier, and that members of Congress asked to be briefed about it,” Graham said.
Graham added that he has discovered notes that the FBI drafted ahead of a briefing in 2018.


“Stay tuned next week, you’re going to find that not only did the FBI lie to the FISA court, they lied their ass off to the Congress,” Graham said.
Peter Strzok was at the center of everything Trump
Strzok concocted the infamous Oct 2016 Intelligence Community assessment with John Brennan that asserted Russia had interfered with the election to help Trump. Using the Steele Dossier as an integral part of the assessment.

Coup Plotter Susan Rice: Biden’s VP pick or Durham’s Criminal Defendant
Strzok produced the notes from the infamous White House January 5th meeting in the Oval Office. The meeting of the Coup Potters where Joe Biden said to use the Logan Act against Flynn.

Brennan, Strzok, Obama, Rice, Page, Durham, Russia, Steele, Dossier

Peter Strozk's unclassified notes from January 5, 2017 White House meeting
From Unsealed documents suggest Joe Biden ‘personally raised the idea’ of investigating Michael Flynn over his ties to Russia:

Flynn’s defense lawyers Jesse Binnall and Sidney Powell say the unsealed notes suggest it was Biden who proposed the use of the Logan Act in the investigation into Donald Trump’s former national security adviser.
‘According to Strzok’s notes, it appears that Vice President Biden personally raised the idea of the Logan Act,’ Binnall and Powell wrote in Wednesday’s court filing.
‘That became an admitted pretext to investigate General Flynn.’
Brennan, Strzok, Obama, Rice, Page, Durham, Russia, Steele, Dossier

This was the same meeting where Barack Obama’s direction was to have “the right people” investigate General Flynn. Where Susan Rice swore everything was done “by the book”.

It was Strzok that personally ambushed Michael Flynn in the White House.
Irregularities of the investigation include the aftermath of the January 24, 2017 interview with Flynn by FBI agents Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka on January 24, 2017. In this interview, the 302 asserts, Flynn was alleged to have lied about a December phone call with the Russian ambassador Sergey I. Kislyak.

Only Strzok tells Page on February 10 he is heavily editing Pientka’s FD-302 form to the point he’s “trying not to completely re-write” it. Additionally, it appears from reports that Page also reviewed the FD-302 forms, providing editing. However, Page was not present in the interview, offering a further indication as to how the 302 was re-formed by Strzok to meet the directives of the Obama administration.

On February 14, Page texts Strzok, “Is Andy (FBI Director McCabe) good with the 302?” – The next day, the Flynn FD-302 was officially submitted and filed with the FBI. The process which, as a matter of protocol, should have an immediate turn around of less than five days. The Flynn FD-302 filing, however, took over a month from the January 5 meeting. Why? To ensure that it held the information necessary to obtain the warrants to spy on Flynn and the Trump administration.

Important to remember is that interviewing agents, other than Strzok, did not believe Flynn had lied. This, of course, was not included in the edited FD-302s submitted.

FBI agents James Gagliano and Special Agent Thomas J. Baker both expressing concerns about the FD-302’s that were heavily edited, something that is never to be done, or that Page had any hand in re-writing the FD-302 that led to the Obama administration’s spying on the Trump administration.

“For [Strzok] to send that 302 to Lisa Page, a non-badge wearing, non-credential-having FBI agent, is unconscionable,” says Gagliano.
Who morphed the famous “insurance policy” into the Mueller inquisition.

“The FBI set up General Flynn — that is clear as day,” Rep. Devin Nunes, ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, tells RealClearInvestigations. “There is FBI leadership ordering the case kept open when agents wanted to close it for lack of evidence, the discussion of getting Flynn to lie or trying to get him fired, the ambush interview, the withholding of exculpatory evidence, and many other acts of blatant malfeasance. None of this is standard procedure. It’s a naked abuse of authority.”
Peter Strzok has some answering to do
Until his texts and emails with Lisa Page were exposed by Inspector General Horowitz.

Brennan, Strzok, Obama, Rice, Page, Durham, Russia, Steele, Dossier

Brennan, Strzok, Obama, Rice, Page, Durham, Russia, Steele, Dossier

Exposing the rot in the Russia Hoax. Blowing a hole on the coup d’état of a duly elected President. Costing Strzok and lover Lisa Page their anonymity. While making clear the unconstitutional abuse of the intelligence agencies. Exposing the widespread conspiracy to overthrow the President of the United States.

So Peter Strzok surely has some answering to do and if Adam Housley and his sources are right then higher-ups throughout the Obama White House should be more than a little nervous. Because if Strzok is talking, then he is flipping on them.

Obama White House in the crosshairs
That would include Andrew McCabe, Bill Priestrap, and James Comey at the FBI. Strzok would have a lot to tell Durham about John Brennan and James Clapper. The bulk of the ICA was literally written by Strzok and Brennen. Not by 17 intelligence agencies. Time for John Brennan to lawyer up if he hasn’t already.

The Russia Hoax: James Clapper throws Barack Obama under the bus
Brennan is clearly one of the principal targets of the Durham probe. But Susan Rice does not escape scrutiny. Nor does Ben Rhodes, Samantha Powers, or Vice President Joe Biden. It goes all the way to the Oval Office.

“POTUS wants to Know everything we are doing” Strzok texted Lisa Page on one occasion. “The White House is running this” on another.
Peter Strzok can shed crucial light on what Obama knew and when he knew it. Or more precisely, what did Obama order, and when did he order it?

Obama’s systemic abuse of NSA surveillance systems
It is not just the campaign to destroy Donald Trump that is concerning. Barack Obama and his illegal Oval Office spying operation under Brennan and Rice had been using NSA surveillance technology to systematically spy on American citizens for years. They were unmasking people routinely.

As Adam Housley continued on Twitter in discussing Obamagate on July 23rd:

My opinion here….as I’ve said from day one…this crosses party lines. I know the MAGA crowd focuses on the President, but this started waaaaay before he ever came down the golden escalator.

— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) July 24, 2020


“My opinion here….as I’ve said from day one…this crosses party lines. I know the MAGA crowd focuses on the President, but this started waaaaay before he ever came down the golden escalator”

Again…someone needs to ask Bernie Sanders whether he was unmasked. Also someone needs to contact Jane Harman. Just a thought.

— Adam Housley (@adamhousley) July 24, 2020

“Again…someone needs to ask Bernie Sanders whether he was unmasked. Also someone needs to contact Jane Harman. Just a thought.”

Obama White House: Unmasking political opponents
Unmasking isn’t just revealing your name. It is allowing access to all of your personal communications. Emails. Texts. Contacts. Your contacts contacts.

FISA Court exposes Obama’s abuse of NSA to spy on Americans
Unmasking is a chain of espionage reserved for terrorists and enemies, not political opponents. Samantha Powers unmasked American citizens, most of them associated with Trump, over 300 times in 2016. (Samantha Power allegedly tried to ‘unmask’ Americans on a daily basis)

But Powers denies she did it. She blames her staff. Really. I don’t know what is scarier.



Obama was spying on everyone, including Journalists
Barack Obama did not just spy on Trump and Republicans. They were spying on Bernie Sanders. They were spying on Jane Harman. They were spying on journalists. Supreme Court justices. The tools of NSA surveillance were turned illegally against domestic political opponents more than 34,000 times between 2012 and 2016.

FISA Court Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer ruled in April 2017 that the DOJ was “institutionally dishonest”. That the illegal NSA surveillance searches violated the 4th amendment and the civil rights of all the victims.

Obama seeks a third term to stop Durham prosecutions of Deep State coup plotters
The whistle was blown by NSA director Admiral Mike Rogers in March 2016. Immediately after, the DNC and Hillary Clinton hired Perkins Coie to hire Fusion GPS to produce the Steele Dossier. At the same time, John Brennan coordinated with Joseph Mifsud and Stefan Halper to set up George Papadopoulos with the help of Italian and British intelligence agencies. All those meetings were taped and filmed. Enter Peter Strzok to launch Crossfire Hurricane.

What other crimes does Strzok have knowledge of
But what did Strzok know about the illegal use of NSA surveillance? He was head of counterintelligence. Strzok must know who the three contractors who carried out the surveillance operation for Brennan and Clapper for over 4 years were. This was their central political surveillance system. It is rumored that Nellie Ohr, later at Fusion GPS, was involved.

Attorney Barr targets Soros funded Antifa as domestic terrorists
And who else, other than Strzok is cooperating with Durham? Lisa Page. Bill Preistep. Sally Yates. Certainly, they won’t want to sacrifice the remaining years of their lives to protect higher-ups in the Obama Biden White House.

Meadows expects indictments
White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows said last week that he firmly expects indictments to come in the Durham probe. Meadows told Fox News “Its time for people to go to jail”.

“I think the American people are expecting indictments,” Meadows told “Sunday Morning Futures anchor Maria Bartiromo. “I expect indictments based on the evidence I’ve seen. Lindsey Graham did a good job in getting that out. We know that they not only knew that there wasn’t a case, but they continued to investigate and spy.”
George Soros gave Black Lives Matter and Antifa over $100 Million dollars
“And yes, I use the word spy on Trump campaign officials and actually even doing things when this president was sworn in,” Meadows continued. “And after that and doing in an inappropriate manner, you’re going to see a couple of other documents come out in the coming days that will suggest that not only was the campaign spied on, but the FBI did not act appropriately as they were investigating. It’s all starting to come unraveled. And I tell you, it’s time that people go to jail and people are indicted.”
Adam Housley is more circumspect, but just as firm:
“Durham and Barr do not want this investigation to be used for political points, which is the way it should be. There are major rumors that there are already indictments. There are some indictments in the pipeline also for sure. The scope of this investigation is huge. Massive.”

That is an understatement. If Peter Strzok is working with John Durham that can only portend earth shattering events to come in the unraveling of the Russia Hoax.

A reckoning is coming, and not soon enough
Adam Housley is a fine journalist who like Matt Taibbi and Glenn Greenwald, follows the truth wherever it takes them. Every American should be outraged that any President uses the intelligence agencies against domestic political opponents. Even if the victim is Donald Trump. Those of us who lived through Watergate thought the rules were indelible. Clear. Uncontroverted.

You did not spy on Americans.

You did use the intelligence agencies to spy on political opponents. Above all, you don’t destroy the peaceful transition of power to overthrow the government of the United States. You would think that would be self-evident.

Apparently not to Joe Biden and Barack Obama.

https://www.commdiginews.com/politi...rham-flips-on-brennan-comey-and-obama-131181/
 

Number Cruncher

Time to go.... NOW
Joined
Nov 6, 2005
Messages
7,616
Reaction score
896
Points
113
Age
56
Location
Methuen
This stinks to high hell..

But I'm also sick of waiting for the shoes to drop.

Start indicting people and then ask them to turn. Put them in jeopardy.

NOW...
 

Dwight Schrute

Deplorable #63174288
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
40,803
Reaction score
4,301
Points
113
Age
53
Location
America?s Hometown
Strzok is the exact type of person who would be a rat.

He is also the exact type of person who would commit suicide via two shots to the back of the head.

This stinks to high hell..

But I'm also sick of waiting for the shoes to drop.

Start indicting people and then ask them to turn. Put them in jeopardy.

NOW...

Yup.

Time to turn up the heat.

Sickening.

Obama was spying on everyone, including Journalists
Barack Obama did not just spy on Trump and Republicans. They were spying on Bernie Sanders. They were spying on Jane Harman. They were spying on journalists. Supreme Court justices. The tools of NSA surveillance were turned illegally against domestic political opponents more than 34,000 times between 2012 and 2016.
 

Dwight Schrute

Deplorable #63174288
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
40,803
Reaction score
4,301
Points
113
Age
53
Location
America?s Hometown
Please! Please! Please! Even if charges don’t stick. Maybe some heart palpitations for Schiff, Pelosi, & Schumer would be excellent.

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...ida-congressman-says-doj-could-pursue-treason

Congressman: DOJ could pursue treason charges over Russia probe misconduct

Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., sharply rebuked the FBI and suggested that the Department of Justice could potentially pursue charges of treason in connection with conduct related to the Trump-Russia investigation.

"If it's not clear to you now, it should be abundantly clear when these indictments start coming out for individuals involved in this through the Durham probe, that ... this was a politicized, weaponized FBI at the highest level that was solely trying to take down a presidential campaign and then an incumbent president once he got sworn in—and that should scare every American," Steube said during an interview with the John Solomon Reports podcast.



The Florida Republican, an Army veteran who has worked as an Airborne Infantry Officer and JAG Corps Officer, said that he believes "the level to which this agency and these individuals were trying to thwart an incoming president, to me, is treasonous."

The congressman believes the DOJ should be able to pursue charges of lying to Congress—he also said that there should be consequences for "misrepresentations" before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Steube said that the FBI's reputation has been severely damaged.

"We're not talking about individual agents operating in field offices across the country. We're talking about the leadership of the FBI operating the FBI in a way that they're deceiving the FISA Court, that they're surveilling on American citizens for political purposes. And it completely discredited an agency that was once esteemed throughout law enforcement," the congressman noted.
 

Dwight Schrute

Deplorable #63174288
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
40,803
Reaction score
4,301
Points
113
Age
53
Location
America?s Hometown
Durham has his thing going.

We also have the Senate inquiry, and they are HEATING up. Targets are getting publicly outed. Lips will start spilling.

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...c-expansion-russia-probe-senate-investigators

In dramatic expansion of Russia probe, Senate investigators target CIA, State records

Two powerful Senate committee chairman are expanding their hunt for documents that might shine light on abuses during the bungled Russia collusion probe, demanding new evidence be turned over by CIA Director Gina Haspel and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

Senate Homeland and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) sent letters this week to the CIA, State Department, Office of Director of National Intelligence and the FBI that signal the scope of their probes has expanded with recent new revelations.

Many of the new requests appear to focus on people who are suspected to have contributed materials to Christopher Steele's discredited anti-Trump dossier or who trafficked information from the opposition research memo to government officials.

For instance, the chairmen demanded records from Pompeo's department concerning:

Clinton acolyte and former Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, who has admitted he received and provided copies of the Steele dossier
former Clinton associates Cody Shearer and Sidney Blumenthal. Shearer, a relative of Talbott, wrote a dossier similar to Steele's that was provided to the former MI-6 agent.
former State officials Victoria Nuland, Jonathan Winer and Kathleen Kavalec, all of whom had contact with Steele as he was developing his dossier.
The senators also made their most sweeping demands for records from CIA, including any information the spy agency provided the FBI concerning the credibility of Steele as a human source. Recently declassified footnotes from Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz's report on Russia probe abuses revealed that the CIA had raised red flags about Steele's reporting, including that he had been targeted with Russian intelligence agency disinformation about Donald Trump while writing the dossier.

The lawmakers also pressed CIA for any records of requests for assistance from foreign allies in the Russia collusion probe.

Specifically, they requested "all records related to assistance requests about the persons or conduct at issue in the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, whether before or after the opening of the investigation, to the following foreign governments: a. Australia; b. Israel; and c. the United Kingdom," their letter to Haspel stated.

CIA also was pressed for records concerning the conduct of former Obama-era director John Brennan, including his contact about the Russia probe with fired FBI Director James Comey and then-Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid as well as any travel he took to Ukraine, Russia's neighbor.

One of the most highly anticipated requests in the letters involved DNI John Ratcliffe, who was asked to declassify a lengthy report written by former House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes' staff highlighting major failures in the intelligence community's assessment about Russia's intentions in the 2016 election.

The report is believed to highlight both spy tradecraft mistakes and dissension among CIA analysts over the Obama administration's conclusion that Russia's intention was to help Trump win and Hillary Clinton lose. Evidence has emerged since that conclusion was reached in January 2017 — before Trump took office — conflicting with the analysis. For instance, the CIA's warning to the FBI that Russians were feeding bogus dirt on Trump to Clinton's chief researcher cut against the conclusion.

You can read the senators' letters here:

2020-07-28 RHJ-CEG Oversight Letter to Director Haspel.pdf
2020-07-28 RHJ-CEG Oversight Letter to Secretary Pompeo.pdf
2020-07-28 RHJ-CEG Oversight Letter to DNI Ratcliffe.pdf
2020-07-28 RHJ-CEG Oversight Letter to FBI Director Wray & AG Barr.pdf
 

Dwight Schrute

Deplorable #63174288
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
40,803
Reaction score
4,301
Points
113
Age
53
Location
America?s Hometown
There’s hope!

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...-suggests-doj-has-found-breathtaking-evidence

Trump suggests DOJ has found 'breathtaking' evidence of wrongdoing in Russia probe

President Trump said Tuesday night that he believes the Justice Department has uncovered “breathtaking” evidence of misconduct during its investigation of the bungled Russia collusion probe, and he expect results to be released soon.

“I caught them, we caught them spying, using the intelligence apparatus of our country to spy on an opponent or an opposing party’s campaign both before and after the election,” Trump said when asked during an interview with Fox Business host Lou Dobbs what he expects U.S. Attorney John Durham to have found during his investigation.

Attorney General William Barr named Durham, a prosecutor from Connecticut, to be special prosecutor for reviewing the FBI and DOJ's conduct in the Russia collusion fiasco.

Trump said he didn’t want to “get overly involved” in the Durham review but expects a dramatic conclusion to the investigation of the investigators.

“I do hear it is breathtaking what they found. That’s all I can say, breathtaking. And hopefully it will come out soon. But it is beyond what anybody ever thought even possible,” the president said.
 

AkPatsFan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
6,655
Reaction score
740
Points
113
Location
Eagle River, Ak
Sometimes Trumps descriptions of things leaves me laughing and shaking my head, "breathtaking".......really, he couldn't find a better word to use? lol
 

Dwight Schrute

Deplorable #63174288
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
40,803
Reaction score
4,301
Points
113
Age
53
Location
America?s Hometown
Sometimes Trumps descriptions of things leaves me laughing and shaking my head, "breathtaking".......really, he couldn't find a better word to use? lol

Lol!

Agree.

Commonly accepted to use breathtaking as in something beautiful. I guess when you think about it something can equally take your breath away bad. It’s not the word choice I’d go for.
 

Dwight Schrute

Deplorable #63174288
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
40,803
Reaction score
4,301
Points
113
Age
53
Location
America?s Hometown
I expected as much.

At this point the only indictment I’d expect is the guy who intentionally altered the email to lie to a FISA court.

But if the tradeoff is much more publicity that aways public opinion of people on the fence away from this collection of Dims I’ll take it.

Couple it with more to drop in the Epstein travesty and the needle will move.
 

PatsFan09

Done. And. Done.
Joined
Jul 6, 2005
Messages
19,997
Reaction score
1,194
Points
113
Location
Circumlocuting around New England...
I expected as much.

At this point the only indictment I’d expect is the guy who intentionally altered the email to lie to a FISA court.

But if the tradeoff is much more publicity that aways public opinion of people on the fence away from this collection of Dims I’ll take it.

Couple it with more to drop in the Epstein travesty and the needle will move.



Problem is, no one is paying attention to it.
I’m not seeing a peep about this investigation anywhere on social media. 99% or what I’ve learned has been because of you guys following it, which I appreciate .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 

tehmackdaddy

post tenebras lux
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
19,152
Reaction score
1,922
Points
113
Location
IN the world, but not OF the world
Problem is, no one is paying attention to it.
I’m not seeing a peep about this investigation anywhere on social media. 99% or what I’ve learned has been because of you guys following it, which I appreciate .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It is the biggest scandal in the history of the United States and it isn't being covered.

It is amazing how far America has devolved in such a short time.

It is sickening.
 

Dwight Schrute

Deplorable #63174288
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
40,803
Reaction score
4,301
Points
113
Age
53
Location
America?s Hometown
It’s covered almost nightly on Fox, but if you’re a sheep and follow the heard you’ll be laughed at. Why? Because the left doesn’t want light on their misgivings. It detracts from the Trump bashing.
 

Dwight Schrute

Deplorable #63174288
Joined
Nov 15, 2007
Messages
40,803
Reaction score
4,301
Points
113
Age
53
Location
America?s Hometown
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-durham-report-development-friday-election-timing

Barr teases Friday 'development' in Durham probe, says investigation won't be 'dictated to' by election

Attorney General says Connecticut prosecutor's investigation is 'moving along at the proper pace'

Charles Creitz1 hour ago
AG Barr on Durham report: Will be 'significant developments' before electionVideo
There will be "a development" Friday in Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation into the orgins of the Russia investigation, Attorney General William Barr told Fox News' Sean Hannity in an exclusive interview Thursday.

Barr said that the development would not be "earth-shattering," but would be "an indication that things are moving along at the proper pace as dictated by the facts in this investigation."

"There are two different things going on, Sean," Barr said. "I said the American people need to know what actually happened, we need to get the story of what happened in 2016 and '17 out. That will be done.

TRUMP LAYS DOWN GAUNTLET FOR BARR ON DURHAM PROBE

"The second aspect of this is, if people crossed the line, if people involved in that activity violated criminal law, they will be charged. And John Durham is an independent man, highly experienced, and his investigation is pursuing apace. There was some delay because of COVID, but I'm satisfied with the progress and I've said there are going to be developments, significant developments, before the election.

"But we're not doing this on the election schedule," Barr added. "We're aware of the election. We're not going to do anything inappropriate before the election. But we're not being dictated to by this schedule.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"What's dictating the timing of this are developments in the case."
 

AkPatsFan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
6,655
Reaction score
740
Points
113
Location
Eagle River, Ak
One thing, I wish Trump would shut the fuck up and let Barr and Durham do their work, him putting pressure on them isn't going to speed things up.
 

O_P_T

Why Be Normal
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
21,619
Reaction score
2,380
Points
113
Age
61
Location
Windsor, CT
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-durham-report-development-friday-election-timing

Barr teases Friday 'development' in Durham probe, says investigation won't be 'dictated to' by election

Attorney General says Connecticut prosecutor's investigation is 'moving along at the proper pace'

Charles Creitz1 hour ago
AG Barr on Durham report: Will be 'significant developments' before electionVideo
There will be "a development" Friday in Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham's investigation into the orgins of the Russia investigation, Attorney General William Barr told Fox News' Sean Hannity in an exclusive interview Thursday.

Barr said that the development would not be "earth-shattering," but would be "an indication that things are moving along at the proper pace as dictated by the facts in this investigation."

"There are two different things going on, Sean," Barr said. "I said the American people need to know what actually happened, we need to get the story of what happened in 2016 and '17 out. That will be done.

TRUMP LAYS DOWN GAUNTLET FOR BARR ON DURHAM PROBE

"The second aspect of this is, if people crossed the line, if people involved in that activity violated criminal law, they will be charged. And John Durham is an independent man, highly experienced, and his investigation is pursuing apace. There was some delay because of COVID, but I'm satisfied with the progress and I've said there are going to be developments, significant developments, before the election.

"But we're not doing this on the election schedule," Barr added. "We're aware of the election. We're not going to do anything inappropriate before the election. But we're not being dictated to by this schedule.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"What's dictating the timing of this are developments in the case."

The development is Kevin Clinesmith plead guilty to falsifying the FISA court submittal as part of a plea deal.

He’s the guy that changed the email about Carter Page being an asset of the CIA
 

tehmackdaddy

post tenebras lux
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
19,152
Reaction score
1,922
Points
113
Location
IN the world, but not OF the world
The development is Kevin Clinesmith plead guilty to falsifying the FISA court submittal as part of a plea deal.

He’s the guy that changed the email about Carter Page being an asset of the CIA

Oh, I'm sure he just went rogue and made the decision to do that on his own. :rolleyes:

The plea deal is encouraging, though, which means he's probably ratting out somebody higher than him.

Based on the Yates testimony, it appears the Obama administration is looking to make Comey the fall guy.
 
Top