IG Horowitz

benhamean

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Messages
6,020
Reaction score
822
Points
113
Know why Sessions had to recuse, right? Couldn't manage to tell the truth about meeting with Russians.

He won't admit that is lying, but yeah...

Sessions 'was not completely forthcoming', and that was what he trotted out to purge McCabe with.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

PatsFanLisa

No filter
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
24,307
Reaction score
4,257
Points
113
Location
Sharon
Apparently only a few of us read the president's tweets. He actually tweeted that the Attorney General should FIRE McCabe or risk his own job.

And, no, I'm not going back through his numerous ridiculous tweets to find it.

He lied to congress about his meeting with Kislyak.
He is recused from anything to do with Russia, including during the campaign.
Being "prosecuted" for lying to congress is a different animal than lying to congress, the whole world knows it, and getting away with it because nobody has charged him, at least as of now.
 

benhamean

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Messages
6,020
Reaction score
822
Points
113
Trump has established the 'bow to my whims or I'll fire you' precedent. Horowitz sees where failing Dear Leader leads...

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

patswin

WTF
Joined
Jan 18, 2004
Messages
11,969
Reaction score
2,247
Points
113
Location
Gelatinous, Mass
Comey testified under oath he'd never authorized Trump or Clinton leaks. McCabe said leak for which he was fired was authorized by Comey. Ruh roh.
 

benhamean

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Messages
6,020
Reaction score
822
Points
113
Comey testified under oath he'd never authorized Trump or Clinton leaks. McCabe said leak for which he was fired was authorized by Comey. Ruh roh.
Which leak?

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 

PatsFanLisa

No filter
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
24,307
Reaction score
4,257
Points
113
Location
Sharon
Exclusive: Sources contradict Sessions' testimony he opposed Russia outreach

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ testimony that he opposed a proposal for President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign team to meet with Russians has been contradicted by three people who told Reuters they have spoken about the matter to investigators with Special Counsel Robert Mueller or congressional committees.

Sessions testified before Congress in November 2017 that he “pushed back” against the proposal made by former campaign adviser George Papadopoulos at a March 31, 2016 campaign meeting. Then a senator from Alabama, Sessions chaired the meeting as head of the Trump campaign’s foreign policy team.

“Yes, I pushed back,” Sessions told the House Judiciary Committee on Nov. 14, when asked whether he shut down Papadopoulos’ proposed outreach to Russia. Sessions has since also been interviewed by Mueller.

Three people who attended the March campaign meeting told Reuters they gave their version of events to FBI agents or congressional investigators probing Russian interference in the 2016 election. Although the accounts they provided to Reuters differed in certain respects, all threes, who declined to be identified, said Sessions had expressed no objections to Papadopoulos’ idea.

However, another meeting attendee, J.D. Gordon, who was the Trump campaign’s director of national security, told media outlets including Reuters in November that Sessions strongly opposed Papadopoulos’ proposal and said no one should speak of it again. In response to a request for comment, Gordon said on Saturday that he stood by his statement.

Sessions, through Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores, declined to comment beyond his prior testimony. The special counsel’s office also declined to comment. Spokeswomen for the Democrats and Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee did not immediately comment.

Reuters was unable to determine whether Mueller is probing discrepancies in accounts of the March 2016 meeting.

The three accounts, which have not been reported, raise new questions about Sessions’ testimony regarding contacts with Russia during the campaign.

Sessions previously failed to disclose to Congress meetings he had with former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, and testified in October that he was not aware of any campaign representatives communicating with Russians.

Some Democrats have seized on discrepancies in Sessions’ testimony to suggest the attorney general may have committed perjury. A criminal charge would require showing Sessions intended to deceive. Sessions told the House Judiciary Committee that he had always told the truth and testified to the best of his recollection.

Legal experts expressed mixed views about the significance of the contradictions cited by the three sources.

Sessions could argue he misremembered events or perceived his response in a different way, making any contradictions unintentional, some experts said.

Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, said Sessions’ words might be too vague to form the basis of a perjury case because there could be different interpretations of what the term pushing back means.

“If you’re talking about false statements, prosecutors look for something that is concrete and clear,” he said.

Other legal experts said, however, that repeated misstatements by Sessions could enable prosecutors to build a perjury case against him.

“Proving there was intent to lie is a heavy burden for the prosecution. But now you have multiple places where Sessions has arguably made false statements,” said Bennett Gershman, a Pace University law professor.

The March 2016 campaign meeting in Washington was memorialized in a photo Trump posted on Instagram of roughly a dozen men sitting around a table, including Trump, Sessions and Papadopoulos.

Papadopoulos, who pleaded guilty in October to lying to the Federal Bureau of Investigation about his Russia contacts, is now cooperating with Mueller.

According to court documents released after his guilty plea, Papadopoulos said at the campaign meeting that he had connections who could help arrange a meeting between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Papadopoulos continued to pursue Russian contacts after the March 2016 meeting and communicated with some campaign officials about his efforts, according to the court documents.

Trump has said that he does not remember much of what happened at the “very unimportant” campaign meeting. Trump has said he did not meet Putin before becoming president.

Moscow has denied meddling in the election and Trump has denied his campaign colluded with Russia.

Reporting by Karen Freifeld, Sarah N. Lynch and Mark Hosenball; Additional reporting by Jonathan Landay in Washington and Jan Wolfe in New York; Editing by Anthony Lin, Noeleen Walder and Jeffrey Benkoe

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...mony-he-opposed-russia-outreach-idUSKBN1GU0NC
Sounds a lot like "lack of candor", doesn't it?

An honest man. :coffee:
 
OP
Baron Samedi

Baron Samedi

Russian Bot 762X54R
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
29,057
Reaction score
2,427
Points
113
Age
52
Location
Framingham
The Swamp is in full RED ALERT mode...ROFL

Brennan is panicking.
 

PatsFanLisa

No filter
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
24,307
Reaction score
4,257
Points
113
Location
Sharon
So the 2000 lies that have been fact-checked since Trump took office are good? Gotcha.
 
OP
Baron Samedi

Baron Samedi

Russian Bot 762X54R
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
29,057
Reaction score
2,427
Points
113
Age
52
Location
Framingham
Incidentally, I have reason to believe McCabe can still collect his pension, he just can't collect early pension..so he has to wait 7 years....

Which is fine, because that provides plenty of time to convict him by way of due process.

Lacking that, he can collect when he turns 57.
 

anderson

Awfully Cavalier
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
28,990
Reaction score
5,103
Points
113
Age
42
Location
Dappertutto, come un Capo
Incidentally, I have reason to believe McCabe can still collect his pension, he just can't collect early pension..so he has to wait 7 years....

Which is fine, because that provides plenty of time to convict him by way of due process.

Lacking that, he can collect when he turns 57.

What crime?
 
OP
Baron Samedi

Baron Samedi

Russian Bot 762X54R
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
29,057
Reaction score
2,427
Points
113
Age
52
Location
Framingham
What crime?

We could start with perjury, multiple charges of lying to federal investigators under oath.(18 U.S. Code § 1001)

Then, eventually, with the Horowitz report, and whatever the next special counsel uncovers;

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

There will be many more charges, but that will be the essence of it byu the end of all this.
 

PatsFanLisa

No filter
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
24,307
Reaction score
4,257
Points
113
Location
Sharon
We could start with perjury, multiple charges of lying to federal investigators under oath.(18 U.S. Code § 1001)

Then, eventually, with the Horowitz report, and whatever the next special counsel uncovers;

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

There will be many more charges, but that will be the essence of it byu the end of all this.

Where we should start is with the rogue FBI employees who helped Rudy Giuliani and Erik Prince concoct all of this bullshit and who are truly guilty of conspiracy again the United States.

But, yeah, McCabe.
 
Top