IT’S VRABEL!!!!

Imagine how his wife feels just seeing those pics in the paper. And online.
I can imagine "not great."

But whatever we imagine is still conjecture. This may also be how he behaves right in view of his wife.

Do I believe that? No, I believe this looks bad for him and it's more probable than not he's engaged in some shenanigans. But for some reason, as a society, was presume 100% guilty before all evidence has been presented and I don't that is ever fair under any circumstance.
 
The other thing that we may not be taking into consideration is perhaps both of their spouses are aware of this and don't care. there are open relationships out there. From what i've seen online, she has trash talked her spouse publicly quite a bit which I find to be abhorrent behavior. Maybe they just got married to have kids or something. who knows?
 
Holy wow if this is true

View: https://x.com/FearedBuck/status/2041666066594636155?s=20
Invisible friends.Yeah, that's it, that's the ticket...😄
Both Russini and Vrabel insist they were there with friends and say they simply weren’t visible in the pictures.

Ruh ro! If it walks like a duck . . . And didn't BB also have an affair w one of the Pats' assistants when he was there? Not Linda Whatzername which began after he got divorced, but another office person there.
 
Someone pointed out on X that perhaps this was a real issue in his firing by the titans. Because information was being leaked to the media and she was covering the team at that point.Perhaps they knew who was behind the leaks.
That sounds like BS to me, but whatever the case, why not let them just have their fun? It's kind of a national sport among celebrities. Weddings are generally just photo ops that nobody takes seriously. Right, Kim?
 
Why does everyone point their finger at the man as being the bad guy?
The women know that the man is married and that the little head does the thinking when they strutt their stuff.
It's been that way since Eve seduced Adam. Ok, Adam wasn't married and Eve wasn't a homewrecker.
 
Ruh ro! If it walks like a duck . . . And didn't BB also have an affair w one of the Pats' assistants when he was there? Not Linda Whatzername which began after he got divorced, but another office person there.
He was supposedly ( and I find it easy to believe)fooling around with someone who worked for the giants. At least, her husband named bill in their divorce suit. And it certainly sounds incriminating that he supposedly was paying for a condo for this woman.
 
Last edited:
He was supposedly ( and I find it easy to believe)fooling around with someone who worked for the giants. At least, her husband named bill in their divorce suit. And it certainly sounds incriminating that he supposedly was paying for a condo.For this woman.
Yes, that's what I was thinking of. Your recall surpasses mine! :thumb:
 
Why does everyone point their finger at the man as being the bad guy?
The women know that the man is married and that the little head does the thinking when they strutt their stuff.
It's been that way since Eve seduced Adam. Ok, Adam wasn't married and Eve wasn't a homewrecker.
I'm going to try to forget you said that. And, according to Scripture, the wicked snake was the bad guy. :lecture:
 
Back in my younger single days I used to blame the wicked snake for some bad decisions.
So, you are right.
Yeah, that wicked snake has caused lots of problems over the ages. But IIRC, it was the snake that tempted Eve and she tempted Adam to take a bite of the forbidden apple. After that, his unslakable lust did the rest. So you can't blame Eve, although she got a permanent bad rep from the interpretation of the early Christian elders which has stuck with her in perpetuity. That's when they decided that all women were De Debbill and only put here to tempt the man. IMO, the man had ideas of his own. How do we know Adam didn't flat out rape her?
 
I can imagine "not great."

But whatever we imagine is still conjecture. This may also be how he behaves right in view of his wife.

Do I believe that? No, I believe this looks bad for him and it's more probable than not he's engaged in some shenanigans. But for some reason, as a society, was presume 100% guilty before all evidence has been presented and I don't that is ever fair under any circumstance.
well said.
 
Back
Top