IT’S VRABEL!!!!

Share this page

spacecrime said:
No, behavioral patterns about demographic groups (white men can't jump, women make decisions based more on emotion than logic, men lack emotional depth, the Irish drink more than the Swiss, Jews are penurious, teens are rebellious, yadda yadda yadda, work ONLY for the group IN GENERAL, it breaks down when you try to pin perceived general group patterns/behavior on individuals within the group.
Click to expand...
I get the point you’re making, but it’s not really what’s being argued. No one’s saying you can box an individual into a stereotype. The point is that patterns and context influence how people read behavior, especially with leaders. People are always sizing up credibility, noticing changes in consistency, and reacting to what feels like integrity or lack of it. That’s just how people operate.

So saying “group patterns don’t apply to individuals” doesn’t really push back on anything here. It just sets the bar at “it has to be true for everyone or it’s not worth discussing,” which isn’t how real-world judgment works.

This isn’t about certainty. It’s about whether something could reasonably have an impact. And with leadership, even perception can affect how people respond. Writing that off completely kind of sidesteps the actual point.
 
king of kings said:
You're not interested in discussing based on examples and logic; you only care about Vrabel violating your morals and standards - he cheated on his wife. You're upset that the Patriots or NFL haven't held him accountable for it. So what type of punishment do you think he deserves
Click to expand...
I don't want him punished at all or to resign.
 
king of kings said:
You're not interested in discussing based on examples and logic; you only care about Vrabel violating your morals and standards - he cheated on his wife. You're upset that the Patriots or NFL haven't held him accountable for it. So what type of punishment do you think he deserves
Click to expand...
I haven't seen that at all from Mazz. Not even a little bit. Don't think that's fair at all.
 
Mazz22 said:
You’re drawing a line between “professional analysis” and “speculation,” but you’re setting the bar in a way that rules out almost all real-world discussion. Nobody here is claiming direct locker room access or stating conclusions as fact. The point is to interpret a public situation using patterns we’ve all seen before in leadership, credibility, and team dynamics. That’s not the same thing as
Click to expand...
Do you know what a priofessional analysis is? I’m speaking as a Psychologist my profession
Mazz22 said:
Also, psychological reasoning doesn’t require firsthand access to be valid. It often works from observable behavior and known dynamics. If a leader’s public conduct raises questions about consistency or judgment, it’s reasonable to discuss how that could translate internally. Not as certainty, but as informed possibility.
Click to expand...
I’m not talking about psychological reasoning though.
  • Deductive reasoning: Drawing specific conclusions from general premises.
  • Inductive reasoning: Making broad generalizations from specific observations.
  • Analogical reasoning: Using past experiences to understand new situations.
  • Abductive reasoning: Forming the most likely explanation from incomplete information
  • The field is essential to cognitive psychology, merging with neuroscience and AI to understand human behavior and decision-making limitations. I’m a child psychologist
Mazz22 said:
Calling it “just opinion” flattens the distinction between a take grounded in patterns and one based purely on preference. There’s a difference between “I don’t care about this” and “this has no potential impact.” The first is personal. The second is a claim. And the idea that discussing it is “counterproductive” or “causing issues” doesn’t really track. Fans talking about a public situation isn’t what creates internal consequences. If there are effects, they come from the situation itself, not from people analyzing it afterward.
Click to expand...
Opinions can be personal views based on feelings, professional, or formal judgments. Which also could include public opinion (collective societal views) and expert opinions. Sure we can talk ie gossip about it forever absolutely. It isn’t going to change most people’s opinions. I was speaking of rehashing within the team and news.

Mazz22 said:
At the end of the day, you’re choosing not to engage with the potential implications. That’s completely fair. But that’s a personal threshold, not a professional standard that shuts down the discussion altogether.
Click to expand...
The conversations we’re having here what potential implications might that be, serious question? You yourself say you don’t want him fired or to resign…. So what are we discussing then Kraft says he’s not firing him and the NFL ( Goodell) isn’t punishing him. So what are these potential implications and professional standards that are shutting down this discussion?

Roger Goodell announced that the league will not punish New England Patriots coach Mike Vrabelregarding the scandal involving reporter Dianna Russini. Goodell classified the incident as a "personal matter" rather than a violation of the league's personal conduct policy. Vrabel is handling the situation internally, including taking time for counseling
Click to expand...
So I guess I’m not sure why an affair a personal matter needs to publically matter? It was made public. yes which was unfortunate. He made a mistake yes, but that’s the end according to the NFL, and Kraft. I fail to see what further discussion is needed?

~Dee~
 
Last edited:
RoadGrader said:
this tragic situation is ALL due to YOU WOMEN!!!

dragging down our magnificent MEN --- and FOR WHAT??!!!??!!!

View attachment 39629

Instagram posts??? :confused1::confused1:

MAKES YA SICK:cuss:
Click to expand...
Come on man! BB looks happy. Look closely at his face, it looks like a smile or he just squeezed out a fart.
He even wearing a pink tie.


A pink f'ing tie:sad95: What has that witch done to him??:mad:
 
The affair only matters to some extent. It matters in the context of the focus on making good decisions on and off the field. But how he reacted to the initial report matters as well, given the culture of accountability that he's been pushing. Both of those things go to his credibility by nature.

That said, I'm not sure what any further discussion does.

The issue might be if there continues to be smoke around conflicts of interest and tampering. Most of the ethical stuff is on her end, not his, but tampering could be an issue that comes back at the Patriots, and potentially gives the league an excuse to do something stupid in terms of levying a penalty.
 
deec77 said:
Do you know what a priofessional analysis is? I’m speaking as a Psychologist my profession

I’m not talking about psychological reasoning though.
  • Deductive reasoning: Drawing specific conclusions from general premises.
  • Inductive reasoning: Making broad generalizations from specific observations.
  • Analogical reasoning: Using past experiences to understand new situations.
  • Abductive reasoning: Forming the most likely explanation from incomplete information
  • The field is essential to cognitive psychology, merging with neuroscience and AI to understand human behavior and decision-making limitations. I’m a child psychologist

Opinions can be personal views based on feelings, professional, or formal judgments. Which also could include public opinion (collective societal views) and expert opinions. Sure we can talk ie gossip about it forever absolutely. It isn’t going to change most people’s opinions. I was speaking of rehashing within the team and news.


The conversations we’re having here what potential implications might that be, serious question? You yourself say you don’t want him fired or to resign…. So what are we discussing then Kraft says he’s not firing him and the NFL ( Goodell) isn’t punishing him. So what are these potential implications and professional standards that are shutting down this discussion?


So I guess I’m not sure why an affair a personal matter needs to publically matter? It was made public. yes which was unfortunate. He made a mistake yes, but that’s the end according to the NFL, and Kraft. I fail to see what further discussion is needed?

~Dee~
Click to expand...
I think we’re talking past each other a bit.

When you say “professional analysis,” you’re applying a clinical standard, which makes sense given your background. But that’s not really what’s happening here. Nobody is diagnosing Vrabel or claiming insider knowledge. This is more like how fans evaluate leadership all the time based on patterns we’ve seen play out in sports.

And those “potential implications” I’m talking about aren’t punishments or league action. They’re the softer things that don’t show up in a press release but still matter: credibility, consistency, how players read their coach, whether his message lands the same way.

Those aren’t guaranteed outcomes, and I’m not saying they will happen. I’m saying they’re reasonable possibilities based on how leadership dynamics tend to work. That’s not the same as gossip, it’s pattern recognition.

On your point about “what’s the purpose if nothing changes." By that standard, most sports discussion wouldn’t exist. We talk about decisions, culture, locker room dynamics, all the time without expecting the team to act on it. It’s just part of understanding the team beyond the box score.

If your position is that you don’t think it will have any impact, that’s fair. But that’s a conclusion, not a rule that shuts down the discussion altogether.

Curious though, do you think stuff like this ever affects how players view a coach, even a little, or do you think it’s completely compartmentalized once the team decides to move on?
 
ParanoidPatriot said:
Come on man! BB looks happy. Look closely at his face, it looks like a smile or he just squeezed out a fart.
He even wearing a pink tie.


A pink f'ing tie:sad95: What has that witch done to him??:mad:
Click to expand...
Here's some useless trivia for you. Right up until the early 20th Century, Pink was the colour for boys and blue for girls. Pink was deemed to be strong and decisive and masuline (related to red), and Blue was considered feminine and dainty. And then in the 40s/50s, it reversed, apparently due to marketing and retail trends.

"The change to pink for girls and blue for boys did not fully solidify until the 1940s, when retailers standardized the colors to boost sales by preventing the reuse of clothing across genders."
 
ParanoidPatriot said:
Come on man! BB looks happy. Look closely at his face, it looks like a smile or he just squeezed out a fart.
He even wearing a pink tie.


A pink f'ing tie:sad95: What has that witch done to him??:mad:
Click to expand...
That's a Kentucky Derby thing. I don't think there as strict as they used to be but they do have a recommended dress code. Pink was part of the scheme this year if not every year.

Bill loves the races so I'm sure he would follow the recs. And who wouldn't have a big smile like that walking down the derby stretch.
 
Roberto71 said:
Here's some useless trivia for you. Right up until the early 20th Century, Pink was the colour for boys and blue for girls. Pink was deemed to be strong and decisive and masuline (related to red), and Blue was considered feminine and dainty. And then in the 40s/50s, it reversed, apparently due to marketing and retail trends.

"The change to pink for girls and blue for boys did not fully solidify until the 1940s, when retailers standardized the colors to boost sales by preventing the reuse of clothing across genders."
Click to expand...
GIGO source?
 
signbabybrady said:
That's a Kentucky Derby thing. I don't think there as strict as they used to be but they do have a recommended dress code. Pink was part of the scheme this year if not every year.

Bill loves the races so I'm sure he would follow the recs. And who wouldn't have a big smile like that walking down the derby stretch.
Click to expand...
R
Rose Red is the official color of the Kentucky Derby.
That has nothing to do with the Vrabel cheatin' scandal. Or what is doing to the fragile psyche the players, assistant coaches, and equipment managers of the New England Patriots.
Posting that photo of BB was and attempt by RG to hijack the thread. I took the bait, hook, line, and sinker.
 
Mazz22 said:
I think we’re talking past each other a bit.

When you say “professional analysis,” you’re applying a clinical standard, which makes sense given your background. But that’s not really what’s happening here. Nobody is diagnosing Vrabel or claiming insider knowledge. This is more like how fans evaluate leadership all the time based on patterns we’ve seen play out in sports.
Click to expand...
So you don’t know what a professional analyst is I take it. And no I’m not applying a clinical standard of professional analysis. I’m not analyzing the team or Vrabel and I don’t analyze anything nor am I diagnosing Vrabel …I’ve never met the man nor spoken to him so it would irresponsible of me to diagnose someone based on gossip. I understand that is your opinion of how fans evaluate leadership your missing my point ….which is not all fans agree with your evaluation… it’s that simple
Mazz22 said:
And those “potential implications” I’m talking about aren’t punishments or league action. They’re the softer things that don’t show up in a press release but still matter: credibility, consistency, how players read their coach, whether his message lands the same way.

Those aren’t guaranteed outcomes, and I’m not saying they will happen. I’m saying they’re reasonable possibilities based on how leadership dynamics tend to work. That’s not the same as gossip, it’s pattern recognition.
Click to expand...
I find your potential implications again your opinion as well… not sure what pattern your following regarding leadership dynamics…are you saying the team will disregard Vrabels poor choices, dwell on them, or you’re really aren’t sure?
Mazz22 said:
On your point about “what’s the purpose if nothing changes." By that standard, most sports discussion wouldn’t exist. We talk about decisions, culture, locker room dynamics, all the time without expecting the team to act on it. It’s just part of understanding the team beyond the box score.
Click to expand...
Thats not my point not sure where you got that impression ….i was speaking more of the press …
Mazz22 said:
If your position is that you don’t think it will have any impact, that’s fair. But that’s a conclusion, not a rule that shuts down the discussion altogether.
Click to expand...
I’m not concluding anything…just saying this discussion is almost coming full circle and there’s very little left to say regarding this topic. Could it affect the team yes it’s possible. I find the trading insider knowledge more concerning then the affair by far
Mazz22 said:
Curious though, do you think stuff like this ever affects how players view a coach, even a little, or do you think it’s completely compartmentalized once the team decides to move on?
Click to expand...
Stuff like affairs? Perhaps a little bit depending on the players individual opinions …but is it enough to lose total faith in the coach … I can’t know that without knowing what and when the players were told and by whom and or how…I’m a fan not a fly on the wall.

~Dee~
 
Last edited:
In this thread some of you guys are just going around and around in circles not accomplishing anything just want to have the last word regardless. The want or need to be correct. We're not advancing the thread it is at a stand still. Nothing really new and nothing advancing the topic thread. There is nothing being written that is delete thread, lock thread or move thread worthy ( regardless what ppl are saying to me on the side)so we're just going to go around Circle.

Have fun.
 
The only thing discussing this does is hurt the Patriots.
Vrable is a good coach.
I stand with Vrable.
That’s all that needs to be said.

If TMZ wants to cover this for people who don’t watch NFl games let them. It’s just noise.
 
rivshark86 said:
The only thing discussing this does is hurt the Patriots.
Vrable is a good coach.
I stand with Vrable.
That’s all that needs to be said.

If TMZ wants to cover this for people who don’t watch NFl games let them. It’s just noise.
Click to expand...
Agreed.

Now let's leave all this and head over to another thread and talk about big tits.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top