Mac Jones Is Our QB1

5/5

AP21002069792913.jpg
Jones warms up before the Rose Bowl game against Notre Dame in Arlington, Texas on Jan. 1, 2021. (AP Photo/Roger Steinman)
Come September, Jones delivered his first touchdown pass while staring down a barrel at Missouri. Linebacker Nick Bolton, a future second-rounder, crushed Jones as he lofted a perfect throw to Waddle on an 18-yard crosser. His pocket presence slowly began reminding scouts of Brady.

“Their strengths are similar,” Nagy said, “especially in terms of pocket feel and in-pocket movement, accuracy and field vision.”

Later, Jones’ quick release strengthened the comparisons. He routinely trusted his eyes and fired, eventually finishing with the 38th-fastest release in college football, per Pro Football Focus.

“Through his front recognition and study of body language, Mac could anticipate things that were coming,” Sarkisian said. “And that allowed him to play a really fast brand of football.”

Jones’ film study became so detailed he could foretell when a linebacker would drop into coverage or blitz pre-snap based on whether he was resting his hands lightly on his thigh pads (drop) or heavily on his knees (blitz).

Ahead of a showdown with third-ranked Georgia, the coaching staff uncovered a vital tell that allowed Jones to nullify a tactic the Bulldogs used to confuse opponents’ blocking rules. Senior linebacker Monty Rice, Georgia’s defensive leader, always held his mouthpiece before calling for all defensive linemen to shift laterally or “stem” moments before the snap. If Rice’s mouthpiece was in place, Jones could trust Georgia’s defensive front would be, too.

But any time Rice held his mouthpiece, Jones would execute a hard count and wait out the linebacker until he made his stem call.

“Mac was wired into it from the first snap of the game,” Sarkisian said. “He said, ‘I got it. He’s doing the exact same thing off the tape. We got him.'”

Mind you, Jones monitored this tell while deciphering Georgia’s defensive disguises, setting protections and occasionally signaling for new routes. It took Alabama three quarters to create distance from Georgia, but eventually Jones pulled away, going 24-of-32 for 417 yards and four touchdowns in a double-digit win.

Inside the facility, Jones pulled everyone closer to him.

“He was a guy that, for whatever reason was able to connect with everybody on the team in his own way,” said Huff. “He wasn’t trying to be cool with certain guys. He was just going to be Mac Jones.”

Though it wasn’t all fist bumps and belly laughs.

“He was never afraid to tell the left tackle in practice, ‘Hey, shut the (expletive) up and slide left,'” Huff said. “And it wasn’t in a disrespectful manner. But he was saying, I might be wrong, but I’m not going to get hit from behind if I’m wrong.”

Saving his ultimate Brady cliché for last, Jones absolutely shined under a championship spotlight. In the College Football Playoff, he completed better than 80% of his passes for more than 750 yards, nine touchdowns and zero picks.

By season’s end, he posted the highest adjusted completion percentage in the country, per PFF, at 84.2%. He was the most accurate passer within 10 yards of the line of scrimmage, and led the nation in deep passing yards.

The most natural comparison was the most uncomfortable. It required a qualifier at every opportunity.

He looks like, throws like, moves like, but obviously isn’t, Brady.

Welcome to New England

A final picture.

Jones stands atop a small makeshift stage at Gillette Stadium, wearing a ballcap and navy suit. Dozens of masked reporters are arranged in a semi-circle before him. They snap pictures and ask questions. Behind Jones, the north end video board says it all: Welcome to New England.

Jones holds a microphone in his right hand, ready to unwind another team-friendly, albeit genuine, answer about putting the team first and living in the present. Except in this moment, Jones’ gaze has escaped to the past. His eyes have settled on the six Super Bowl banners hanging high above the opposite end zone.

MacJonesnc9.jpg


There’s room for a seventh. That’s why he’s here.

Soon enough, the future of the franchise is escorted back into the safety of his stadium. He sits for an interview inside the team’s media studio, the only place in Foxboro where drama needs to be manufactured. Within a few minutes, he’s asked to retell the story of draft night, what it felt like waiting for a moment to materialize.

Jones smiles. It’s the same story of his recruitment, and college career.

“Secretly, I knew,” he said. “Deep down inside, I was like, this is going to happen.”

It can’t possibly be fate, and yet it’s too soon to know for certain.
 
Great stuff, Al. I've not been a big fan of Callahan, so thanks for posting the entire thing, but after reading that I might have to reconsider. It was a really good overview of
why Mac is the guy we all feel is just the guy we need leading this team.

Because the power of being Mac Jones does not lie in the obvious physical or the hidden mental. It lives at their intersection, within his striking ability to make belief materialize on a football field; from completing passes he’s released before receivers snap off their routes to vaulting himself into college football lore after three years of waiting, working and dreaming.

Yeah, that was pretty good. :thumb:
 
Great stuff, Al. I've not been a big fan of Callahan, so thanks for posting the entire thing, but after reading that I might have to reconsider. It was a really good overview of
why Mac is the guy we all feel is just the guy we need leading this team.

Because the power of being Mac Jones does not lie in the obvious physical or the hidden mental. It lives at their intersection, within his striking ability to make belief materialize on a football field; from completing passes he’s released before receivers snap off their routes to vaulting himself into college football lore after three years of waiting, working and dreaming.

Yeah, that was pretty good. :thumb:
Very good. There are a few others in there as well, but you grabbed the best.
 
Great stuff, Al. I've not been a big fan of Callahan, so thanks for posting the entire thing, but after reading that I might have to reconsider. It was a really good overview of
why Mac is the guy we all feel is just the guy we need leading this team.

Because the power of being Mac Jones does not lie in the obvious physical or the hidden mental. It lives at their intersection, within his striking ability to make belief materialize on a football field; from completing passes he’s released before receivers snap off their routes to vaulting himself into college football lore after three years of waiting, working and dreaming.

Yeah, that was pretty good. :thumb:
When you are busy contributing to the football narrative here, I am a happy camper.

Cheers
 
When you are busy contributing to the football narrative here, I am a happy camper.

Cheers

Right back at you, Timmymeboy. :thumb:

I get bored with the doldrums of the offseason and it's been a busy summer so far, but I'm tanned, rested and ready for Patriots football.

I love TC and preseason and definitely look forward to the news wires to be humming again with real football stuff.

I can only go "look at how much those jackasses in Arizona are paying that stiff Murray!!!" or "Poor Jimmy G. There is just no love for that boy out there" so much.

I need Patriots stuff to get properly motivated.
 
Anyway, I heard someone going on about how Mac feasted on shredding zones, but you can tell he's bumping up against his ceiling because he's sucky against man coverage. Apparently his completion % against zone is 72.6% vs 56.1% against man, and his QBR drops by 10 points.

I'm looking this over and listening to his argument, and it occurs to me: it isn't that Mac is bad against man, or it gives him big problems or anything like that. It's that he wasn't a rookie against zone, but he was still a rookie against man. And that makes sense, because what separated him from other rookies was his quick processing and ability to diagnose the zone coverage commitments. Against man, that separator provided no additional value for him, and it was just his raw skill as a rookie QB against the best coverage talent in the world. Man coverage also highlights the relative skill level of the WRs you're throwing to - your stud WR1s beat man coverage consistently and painfully, and the Patriots simply didn't have one of those.

I'm going to go ahead and assume that Mac will continue to develop, and that he will continue to beat zone coverages like a drum. I think Agholor and/or Thornton stepping up may be major keys to his next steps in making teams pay for man coverage.
 
Anyway, I heard someone going on about how Mac feasted on shredding zones, but you can tell he's bumping up against his ceiling because he's sucky against man coverage. Apparently his completion % against zone is 72.6% vs 56.1% against man, and his QBR drops by 10 points.

I'm looking this over and listening to his argument, and it occurs to me: it isn't that Mac is bad against man, or it gives him big problems or anything like that. It's that he wasn't a rookie against zone, but he was still a rookie against man. And that makes sense, because what separated him from other rookies was his quick processing and ability to diagnose the zone coverage commitments. Against man, that separator provided no additional value for him, and it was just his raw skill as a rookie QB against the best coverage talent in the world. Man coverage also highlights the relative skill level of the WRs you're throwing to - your stud WR1s beat man coverage consistently and painfully, and the Patriots simply didn't have one of those.

I'm going to go ahead and assume that Mac will continue to develop, and that he will continue to beat zone coverages like a drum. I think Agholor and/or Thornton stepping up may be major keys to his next steps in making teams pay for man coverage.
Good thoughts, Flagg. ANd I agree that burners are one of the keys to defeating man. Fall for a speedster's juke move and let him get behind you and you're dead. Part of the reason Mac looks bad in camp is that he has no time to throw. OLine just needs to run through more plays and get working as a unit.
 
Is this pointing out a shortcoming for Mac or the receivers?
Mac, but it's a shortcoming that was aggravated by the lack of game-breaking ability from the WRs.

Basically, a typical draftee with OmfgArmTalent is going to be better against man, when it's about instinct and gunning the ball into tight windows. Mac's advantage vs other rookies was in diagnosing zones, and finding the gaps in the zones. Take away most of that advantage by running man and you're left with a rookie.
 
Mac, but it's a shortcoming that was aggravated by the lack of game-breaking ability from the WRs.

Basically, a typical draftee with OmfgArmTalent is going to be better against man, when it's about instinct and gunning the ball into tight windows. Mac's advantage vs other rookies was in diagnosing zones, and finding the gaps in the zones. Take away most of that advantage by running man and you're left with a rookie.

To beat man you need some separation on average. Separation has been an issue for the Patriots the last couple of years. That may be on the way to getting better as even one better WR will shift the coverage capability "down" at each WR position giving the WR a better chance at separation. Separation = better man %.

I am 100% positive somebody else can write that better than me...
 
Back
Top