Damn, it will be such a hammer blow if the Bruins don't turn this around. They are the better side but they are getting outfought.

Not over yet, but the next game is the biggest of their lives. This is it.
 
Scathingly well written article:


https://thehockeynews.com/news/arti...g-an-otherwise-entertaining-stanley-cup-final

Officiating is hijacking an otherwise entertaining Stanley Cup final

A non-call led to the game-winning goal in Game 5 of the Stanley Cup final, and post-game, Bruins coach Bruce Cassidy said the NHL is "getting a black eye with their officiating in the playoffs."

Tags: boston bruins, referees, st. louis blues, stanley cup playoffs
June 7, 2019
Tyler Bozak celebrates as he skates by Noel Acciari|Bruce Bennett/Getty Images
BOSTON – The NHL does not allow its on-ice officials to comment on calls or non-calls, so after Game 5 of the Stanley Cup final, referee Kelly Sutherland was as silent post-game as he was at 10:36 of the third period when, for reasons only he can explain, he failed to put the whistle to his lips and call an obvious penalty that transpired 10 feet in front of him directly in his line of vision.

But Stephen Walkom, the NHL’s director of officiating, was asked to comment by a Professional Hockey Writers’ Association pool reporter on the non-call and here is what he had to say: “We don’t make comments on judgment calls within games. There are hundreds of judgment calls in every game. The official on the play, he viewed it and he didn’t view it as a penalty at the time.”

This is the same league, however, that is more than happy to comment on, and apologize for, blown calls that are actually made, they way it did to the Vegas Golden Knights for the major penalty referees called in Game 7 that was a major factor in deciding that first-round series. It was a call that cost the Golden Knights the chance to go to the second round of the playoffs and millions of dollars in revenues.

OK, got it. We’ll comment on blown calls, but not non-calls. That is so, so NHL. This is a league that is obsessed with its officials not determining the outcome of games, so much so that its directions to them actually do determine the outcomes of games, and in this case might actually be major factor in deciding who wins the Stanley Cup. It would be very interesting to check with Gary Bettman after Game 5 of the final to see if his head was about to explode, which was the state of mind he was in when all officials missed a hand pass that led to an overtime goal in Game 3 of the Western Conference final.

Listen, your trusty correspondent would love nothing better than to be talking about how the St. Louis Blues are on the verge of ending more than five decades of frustration with one victory between them and the Stanley Cup. Or how rookie goalie Jordan Binnington is evoking memories of Ron Hextall and Ken Dryden. Or how gutsy this Blues team is. But the NHL often takes that narrative away and this is one of those times.

For example, consider what Walkom said. He basically admitted that Sutherland saw the infraction and didn’t view it as a penalty. That’s hugely different from not seeing an infraction, which is a human error and far more excusable. But this is not an error. This is a conscious decision. At best it was a trip, at worst it was a slew-foot and it directly led to the game-winning goal. Not only did the Blues get away with an obvious infraction, they essentially outmanned the Bruins because Noel Acciari couldn’t get back into the play. Even Tyler Bozak himself looked toward Sutherland expecting a call. The NHL was sharp enough, however, to have its concussion spotter take Acciari out of the game to enter concussion protocol, so there’s that.

Not that this had to happen in order for the NHL to fix this, but it’s absolutely imperative the league does something to stop these embarrassments from happening. In 2004-05, it had a full season to save the NHL from drowning in obstruction infractions and in the summer of 2019, it faces a challenge every bit as daunting and crucial. The officiating has been nothing short of dismal.

The league finds itself at a crossroads and faces a major decision here. The referees certainly deserve their share of the blame, but so does a hockey operations department that is filled with former players, many of them tough guys, who direct them to look the other way on calls they believe are marginal and protects and enables them by not making them accountable for the calls they make. There are a host of options available to the league and none of them will ever be perfect, but if the league sits on its hands on this one and does nothing to either improve its officials or review their calls, it will be an even more egregious abdication of responsibility than we’re seeing right now.

It is time for NHL owners to go over the heads of hockey operations and the competition committee and whatever other obstacle stands in its way to make these changes. Otherwise, why would a team bother spending to the salary cap to build a skilled team when this is the way the game is going to be managed when the stage is biggest, the spotlight brightest and the most is on the line?

Bruins coach Bruce Cassidy, of course, was livid with the development. It should be noted that St. Louis coach Craig Berube did not come out unprovoked and attack the officiating after his team gave up four power-play goals in Game 3, but he did respond to a question about it. And that, Cassidy believes, created the environment we’re seeing now.

“I sat here two days ago or whatever it was and I said I believe these officials are at this level because they earned the right to be here and you should be getting the best,” Cassidy said. “The narrative changed after Game 3, there was a complaint or whatever put forth by the opposition and it just seemed to change everything. I mean, this has happened and I’m a fan of the game, this is the National Hockey League and they’re getting a black eye with their officiating in the playoffs and here’s another thing that’s going to be talked about. It was egregious.”

It’s very difficult to disagree with a single syllable Cassidy said after the game. Sometimes officiating is just bad and it really doesn’t have an effect on the game. Others, it leads directly to an unfortunate result. Game 5 was the latter and shame on the NHL if it doesn’t do something to minimize these embarrassments in future Stanley Cup finals.
 
Officials have missed some big calls this spring, including in the finals. But the Bruins have themselves to blame here too. I expected them to outwork the Blues but the opposite is happening.
 
Barbashev will have a hearing for his check to the head that didn't even get a penalty, because the ref 10 feet away didn't see it.
 
Officials have missed some big calls this spring, including in the finals. But the Bruins have themselves to blame here too. I expected them to outwork the Blues but the opposite is happening.

Yup, the Bruins could be better. They however are playing an opponent who is trying to win the game also.

The refs simply need to be able to make the obvious calls, they missed several obvious calls last night, the last several games in fact.
 
Officials have missed some big calls this spring, including in the finals. But the Bruins have themselves to blame here too. I expected them to outwork the Blues but the opposite is happening.

Refs blew that no call that is for sure...... But one thing I have come to expect in sports is there will just be atrocious calls and no calls..... Much like the Saints/Rams game. It happens. Bruins actually played a very good game and out-shot the Blues by a large number.... Binnington was the difference last night. Man is he incredible. Remains to be seen if he is the next great goalie for the Blues or if he is just having a fantastic rookie season only to fall off at some point. I have seen it many times.
 
Yup, the Bruins could be better. They however are playing an opponent who is trying to win the game also.

The refs simply need to be able to make the obvious calls, they missed several obvious calls last night, the last several games in fact.

Agree.

2 head shots.

An offensive zone hold for about 3 seconds.

And an offensive zone slew foot that results in a goal.

That is possibly the poorest officiated game vs a home team I’ve witnessed in 45 years of playing, coaching, and watching the game.
 
Agree.

2 head shots.

An offensive zone hold for about 3 seconds.

And an offensive zone slew foot that results in a goal.

That is possibly the poorest officiated game vs a home team I’ve witnessed in 45 years of playing, coaching, and watching the game.

On 3 of them, the ref is 10 feet away looking at it...

Officiating is a hard job, it can be tough to pickup everything, but these aren't ticky tack or well hidden penalties....they are plain as day blatant calls.
 
Maybe lock him in a room with Cam for a few minutes..

Cam shoulda been waiting for him at the ref room door.


I saw him a couple months back and thought “Well, Cams kinda letting himself go. Looks comfy. Good for him.”

They pan to the box and you see him in full fire mode and there may as well be a loose grizzly up there. Fvcking Reverant.

I wouldn’t mind seeing him knowing on the back of Sutherland’s skull right about now.
 
On 3 of them, the ref is 10 feet away looking at it...

Officiating is a hard job, it can be tough to pickup everything, but these aren't ticky tack or well hidden penalties....they are plain as day blatant calls.

100% agree. In fact they are in good position on all of the missed calls.

Vs the home team.

Makes you not help but wonder if the fix is in. These are clear cut. Shoulder to head(2). Textbook holding in the offensive zone with a loose puck in play. A slew foot and trip. By the same player. On the same play.

Refs all within 20 feet.

That has to be explained.
 
Blues are going to have 2 suspensions in this series for head shots and 2 whole penalty
minutes for it.
 
Ever since Berube whined about the refs it's been open season for head shots by the Blues. And the NHL is now making a pathetic attempt at a make up call by suspending a 4th liner, if that even happens.

I guess it's good on the Blues for gooning it up and taking advantage.
 
Well on a positive note, I didn't notice any Blues players embellishing any hits last night.

For that I was thankful.
 
100% agree. In fact they are in good position on all of the missed calls.

Vs the home team.

Makes you not help but wonder if the fix is in. These are clear cut. Shoulder to head(2). Textbook holding in the offensive zone with a loose puck in play. A slew foot and trip. By the same player. On the same play.

Refs all within 20 feet.

That has to be explained.

Not sure about a fix, but it's clear that the B's cannot score 5 on 5 if the refs continue to allow holding, hooking, interference and blatant head shots. And if that continues, the series will end in game 6.
 
Heard the last portion of Dale Arnold interviewing notes respected official Paul Stewart. He was dumbfounded. Didn’t know how it wasn’t a 5 minute major slew footing.

Worth trying to find on the EEI page. I’m going to later tonite.
 
Back
Top