Yeah, I don’t know where they’re coming from with this. Maybe for not living by the Judge;s decision as she stated she was acting completely within the agreement between the two sides and imposed the maximum punishment for non violent sexual conduct. She also said she couldn’t impose a larger suspension as it would represent such a drastic change in policy that it would have to be discussed and advised to the NFLPA as a matter of fairness.
I think her wording in her report may make it very difficult for the NFL in a Federal Court, but if it’s ironclad that Roger still has the final say then no court could realistically go against that surely?