I’ve pointed out plenty of errors in judgement, whether questionable tweets, lack of seizing opportunities that are clearly present, and more. I don’t think he’s a perfect president. And I acknowledge his personality is very abrasive to many.
I will not be privy to media driven lies that are never refuted though. Unlike many.
---------- Post added at 01:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:55 PM ----------
What part of above is my own perception and not their very instructions?
I’ll wait.
Really? The fact that you tried to blow off everything I posted with some lame attack of Dr Fauci and then of NPR with out apparently any bother of actually reading anything said exactly what I replied with.
As for your attack of Dr. Fauci, First you apparently don't know where that BS line you are posting comes from. So here it is. Fauci, who has been largely supportive of imposing drastic changes on Americans’ daily lives in the name of halting COVID-19’s spread, responded that the question was “tough” because it involves “relative risk.”
“If you’re willing to take a risk—and you know, everybody has their own tolerance for risks—you could figure out if you want to meet somebody,” he said. “And it depends on the level of the interaction that you want to have. If you’re looking for a friend, sit in a room and put a mask on, and you know, chat a bit. If you want to go a little bit more intimate, well, then that’s your choice regarding a risk.”
“The one thing you don’t want to do is make sure the person is feeling well,” Fauci continued. “Even though there’s a lot of asymptomatic infections, that’s one of the things that’s really troublesome. That if everybody transmitted would only transmit when they’re sick, that would be much easier. But what we’re seeing, which becomes really problematic, is that there’s a considerable amount of transmission from an asymptomatic person. And we’ve got well-documented now, you know, that situation on the nuclear carrier, the Roosevelt, USS Roosevelt, where hundreds of sailors have gotten infected from people that were not sick. That’s tough.” From
https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=13148
This is from a writer who first called into questions Dr. Fauci's credentials then called Sen. Rand Paul a medical doctor, Rand Paul's ophthalmology certification is contested. He originally earned board certification in 1993 after the completion of his residency. However, in 1997 he formed his own board, called the National Ophthalmology Board, with 200 other physicians in protest of certification requirement changes by the American Board of Ophthalmologists. The now-defunct board was not recognized by the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, so Dr. Paul was not board certified by a board recognized by the state since 2005, and since Dr. Paul's board dissolved in 2011, he has had no certification from an active body, according to the Washington Post.