Rebuilding The Patriots For 2021 And Beyond

Jeff Howe gives his thoughts - the Athletic

My comments:
I'll add Fla. QB Kyle Trask to his list of QBs to draft. 6'5", 240. Drop back pocket presence++ with decent mobility. 2020 stats - 70% completion rate, 4125 yds, 11.6 AY/A, 43 TDs and only 5 ints. BB could trade back to around 20-25 and still get Trask while adding a late 2nd or early 3rd to boot.
WRs - Marvin Jones &/or Corey Davis would be perfect, thank you.
TE - Hunter Henry for sure. He'd help immensely.
Adding a TE & 2 WRs would do wonders for the offense.
LB - Lavonte David has been productive his entire career plus he can cover a back or a TE.
Of our own FAs, I'm not certain JMac will be back, at least not as a CB; maybe at S. I'd like to keep Byrd and James White.




By Jeff Howe Dec 28, 2020
comment-icon@2x.png
44
save-icon@2x.png


The best thing about 2020? There’s at least a sliver of hope it’ll turn to 2021.
That’s where the Patriots have set their focus, as the regular season will expire in a week and they can turn their attention toward the next phase of their rebuild.
So let’s do the same and make 10 bold predictions for the upcoming year. Due to the likelihood that many of these predictions won’t be worth the paper they’re printed on, this message will soon self-destruct. No receipts, please.

1. The Patriots will trade up to draft a quarterback and keep* Cam Newton​

Bill Belichick has publicly acknowledged the advantages of building a roster around a quarterback on a rookie contract, and there are four franchise-caliber talents who are projected top-10 picks.
Clemson’s Trevor Lawrence will likely be the No. 1 pick — too rich for the Patriots — and BYU’s Zach Wilson, Ohio State’s Justin Fields and North Dakota State’s Trey Lance will be gone shortly thereafter. It’ll most likely cost the Patriots at least a pair of first-round picks to get into range to select one of them.
That’s a price worth paying if there’s conviction behind their evaluation of the right quarterback, and the pace of their rebuild depends on it.
There’d be some value in keeping Newton on a short-money contract, especially if the Patriots boost the talent at tight end and wide receiver. If the Patriots trade up to draft a quarterback, they’re not going to want to also spend a significant chunk of cap space on a veteran, so keeping Newton would make some sense.
He’s good for the locker room and should be a solid mentor for a rookie. If the draft pick isn’t ready to start early in the season, Newton would be a serviceable placeholder.
(*I changed my mind three times while writing this section, could do so 10 more times depending how Jarrett Stidham is involved in the final two games and might do so hundreds more times prior to free agency.)

2. The Patriots will extend Stephon Gilmore’s contract and place a second-round tender on J.C. Jackson​

Gilmore is still playing at an extremely high level, but he’ll only earn $7.5 million in cash next season because the Patriots have accelerated future earnings to keep him competitively compensated over the past two seasons.
While Gilmore’s name has come up in trade conversations, the Patriots didn’t come close to dealing him because there was never an acceptable offer on the table, according to a source. The presumption is the Patriots wouldn’t move him for less than a first-round pick. Would their price actually come down in the next three months, and how much will the torn quad impact his fate?
Keeping Gilmore would therefore make the most sense. A two-year, $28.5 million extension would be fair value, rolling that into the balance of his current contract for a three-year, $36 million pact.
Jackson is a restricted free agent, and the Patriots would like to accumulate more picks, particularly under the premise that they’re willing to trade into the top 10 for a quarterback. The Patriots’ two options with Jackson would be to give him a first- or second-round tender, but it’s historically rare for an opposing team to sign away a restricted free agent at the cost of a first-round pick.
Therefore, use a second-round tender, and entice a team to sign Jackson to an offer sheet. That’s an affordable price for a corner with a budding reputation around the league, and the Patriots could use the second-round asset while replacing Jackson with Joejuan Williams or Myles Bryant. They could also re-sign Jason McCourty.

3. The Patriots’ two biggest splashes in free agency will be Hunter Henry and Lavonte David​

Henry will be the top tight end on the market, so he’ll require a contract worth an average annual value of at least $10 million. But Henry also probably got the memo this month that Belichick is infatuated with him.
The Patriots desperately need more production at tight end. Rookies Devin Asiasi and Dalton Keene could still grow into solid pieces, but how long will it take? The Patriots can’t go a third consecutive year devoid of statistical output from the position, and Henry would be the answer.
David, a linebacker who turns 31 in January, has flown under the radar in Tampa but has been reliable and productive on all three downs throughout his career. If the Patriots can get him for $8-9 million annually, they can stick him in the middle of their defense with Dont’a Hightower and let Josh Uche and Anfernee Jennings flourish alongside them.
The front seven would enjoy an immediate upgrade with David on the inside.

4. Josh Uche will become the Patriots’ top pass rusher​

This is an easy one.
Uche has made an impact with his increased role over the past month, and his trajectory should have a sharp ascension with a normal offseason. Chase Winovich has had a very good season as the Patriots’ best pass rusher, but Uche’s raw talent will shine once the Patriots remove his training wheels.

5. The Patriots will focus on the second tier of free-agent wide receivers​

It would be a surprise if the Patriots completely abandoned their philosophy on paying receivers just because they’ve got $60 million in projected cap space, the fourth-most in the NFL.
That’s why $14-18 million annually doesn’t add up for JuJu Smith-Schuster, Allen Robinson, Chris Godwin, Kenny Golladay or Will Fuller. Rather, it’d make more sense to try to snare a pair of the next tier that includes Curtis Samuel, Marvin Jones, Sammy Watkins and Corey Davis.
If the Patriots can land two of them, somehow land one of the plethora of talented wideouts in the draft and combine them with Julian Edelman, N’Keal Harry and Jakobi Meyers, the group would look much better.

6. The Patriots will re-sign Joe Thuney​

The Pats used the $14.8 million franchise tag on Thuney despite being tight against the cap because they hoped to extend him to a long-term contract. The two sides were never close to an extension before the deadline, nor were the Patriots close to trading him due to an absence of acceptable offers. They also weren’t going to just flip him to the highest bidder due to his value to the team, which played out tenfold as he hopped between left guard and center early in the season.
It’d be surprising if they didn’t continue to offer him a competitive contract. There are only 10 teams with at least $30 million in projected cap room, and it’s tough to envision most of them using a major chunk of it on an interior lineman. Maybe Washington or the Bengals makes a huge push, but Thuney would then have to decide between the fattest payday and an environment he knows best and is closer to achieving postseason success.
It’s unconventional for teams to devote so much cap space to guard, as Shaq Mason will carry a $9.775 million cap hit, but the Patriots can pull it off while their tackles are on rookie contracts.

1/2​

 
Just a question/comment about the Patriots' search for a superbowl-worthy quarterback: How many of those have the Patriots had, since 1966 (the first superbowl season)? I'd say Brady, maybe Bledsoe (he made one), maybe Grogan/Eason (they made one), and possibly Babe Parilli (I never saw him play live, or on tv). Anyway, I'd say Brady, and not much else. Of course, it takes more than the qb to make the SB. Coaching, other talent, and the quality of other contending teams. So....what's the chances of the Patriots getting another SB-worthy qb during the next, say, 20 years? I'd say, very small chances.

p.s.: I'll bet Aaron Rodgers was pissed and confused that Brady's Bucs beat him in the NFC championship game. It was a home game for Rodgers; Brady's 43 years old; and you know, Rogers probably thought he was so good, his team would beat any other team, especially the Bucs. Well, it couldn't have been his fault, could it? haha
 
Last edited:
If we don't go with Offense in the first round. I wouldn't mind seeing the Pats pull the trigger on a dude like Zaven Collins, 6-4 260, strong, quick and can diagnose plays on the fly. Another non offensive player I would like is Chazz Surratt. Former QB turned LB, talk about being able to diagnose offensive plays literally using a QB's mind. I think those two would be interesting picks.

Collins reminds me of Bruschi a little. Smart player who knows where to be and when to be there. I think Surratt with his QB background could the same type of player.

Surratt is a bit on the smallish side (for me anyway) for a LB. 6-2 227, maybe drop him back to SS and move a kid like Duggar over to FS. If Surratt can catch on to playing LB, then I think his QB background would be a good for him transitioing to SS.
 
Last edited:
If we don't go with Offense in the first round. I wouldn't mind seeing the Pats pull the trigger on a dude like Zaven Collins, 6-4 260, strong, quick and can diagnose plays on the fly. Another non offensive player I would like is Chazz Surratt. Former QB turned LB, talk about being able to diagnose offensive plays literally using a QB's mind. I think those two would be interesting picks.

Collins reminds me of Bruschi a little. Smart player who knows where to be and when to be there. I think Surratt with his QB background could the same type of player.

Surratt is a bit on the smallish side (for me anyway) for a LB. 6-2 227, maybe drop him back to SS and move a kid like Duggar over to FS. If Surratt can catch on to playing LB, then I think his QB background would be a good for him transitioning to SS.
I think grabbing some nice defensive talent would also benefit us. I know the defense looked bad this year but I don't think it was entirely on them either. The Offense was terrible and couldn't stay on the field and I think it wore out the defense. We definitely need some help defensively but I think we should have an emphasis on offense obviously.

But Collins, Surratt and Shelvin I think would be intriguing picks for us.
 
The more I read up on Zaven Collins, the more the kid seems like Patriots material and the more I like him. He worked his tail off looking to get a scholarship, no one would offer one. He started out as a QB and won a state championship. He had never played LB before but the HC at Tulsa offered him a tryout at a position Collins had never played before and the Coach was impressed enough to offer him a scholarship.
 
Just a question/comment about the Patriots' search for a superbowl-worthy quarterback: How many of those have the Patriots had, since 1966 (the first superbowl season)? I'd say Brady, maybe Bledsoe (he made one), maybe Grogan/Eason (they made one), and possibly Babe Parilli (I never saw him play live, or on tv). Anyway, I'd say Brady, and not much else. Of course, it takes more than the qb to make the SB. Coaching, other talent, and the quality of other contending teams. So....what's the chances of the Patriots getting another SB-worthy qb during the next, say, 20 years? I'd say, very small chances.

p.s.: I'll bet Aaron Rodgers was pissed and confused that Brady's Bucs beat him in the NFC championship game. It was a home game for Rodgers; Brady's 43 years old; and you know, Rogers probably thought he was so good, his team would beat any other team, especially the Bucs. Well, it couldn't have been his fault, could it? haha
There in lies the problem. Many are expecting the next Tom Brady, we may have to resign ourselves to the fact of maybe just being a playoff team and remaining in the hunt. We may never win another Super Bowl and even teams that win one have a difficult time even getting back, let alone repeating. I think we can still be a very very solid team and get back to the Super Bowl, I think it will need to be a complete team effort and obviously having a QB competent enough to execute the game plan. But I think with the right pieces we could still go out play in and win a Super Bowl or 2.

As for Tony Eason, he crumbled on the biggest stage. That Super Bowl showed all of Pats Nation what he really was. Granted he faced a mean defense but he was afraid out there, nothing more than that. He was scared and it showed. Grogan was a solid player. Bledsoe, made the Pats respectable in the 90's. But showed his tendency to focus on his primary receiver and not hit his check downs. No disrespect to Drew, he was a good QB. Brady just had the "it' factor that very few players possess.

I don't think Rodgers was confused at all. The Packers went up against the GOAT and the most clutch QB in NFL history. To think they would be able to walk away with this win against Brady is short sighted. You have to play 4 quarters against Brady, 2 or 3 quarters just won't cut it. Ask the countless teams that Brady beat with come from behind wins. The Broncos come to mind, they abused Brady for the first half and the Pats were losing 24-0. The Pats won the game 34-31 in over time. You need to hit Brady all game, for 60 minutes, anything less than 60 minutes will more than likely result in an "L"..
 
There in lies the problem. Many are expecting the next Tom Brady, we may have to resign ourselves to the fact of maybe just being a playoff team and remaining in the hunt. We may never win another Super Bowl and even teams that win one have a difficult time even getting back, let alone repeating. I think we can still be a very very solid team and get back to the Super Bowl, I think it will need to be a complete team effort and obviously having a QB competent enough to execute the game plan. But I think with the right pieces we could still go out play in and win a Super Bowl or 2.

As for Tony Eason, he crumbled on the biggest stage. That Super Bowl showed all of Pats Nation what he really was. Granted he faced a mean defense but he was afraid out there, nothing more than that. He was scared and it showed. Grogan was a solid player. Bledsoe, made the Pats respectable in the 90's. But showed his tendency to focus on his primary receiver and not hit his check downs. No disrespect to Drew, he was a good QB. Brady just had the "it' factor that very few players possess.

I don't think Rodgers was confused at all. The Packers went up against the GOAT and the most clutch QB in NFL history. To think they would be able to walk away with this win against Brady is short sighted. You have to play 4 quarters against Brady, 2 or 3 quarters just won't cut it. Ask the countless teams that Brady beat with come from behind wins. The Broncos come to mind, they abused Brady for the first half and the Pats were losing 24-0. The Pats won the game 34-31 in over time. You need to hit Brady all game, for 60 minutes, anything less than 60 minutes will more than likely result in an "L"..
I've got to mention, did you see Rodger's demeanor and the look on his face, when the game ended, and he came to shake Brady's hand? He looked a little confused to me. But yeah, he surely eventually realized the better team won. I do agree with everything you said about the different Pat's quarterbacks. Carry on!
 
I've got to mention, did you see Rodger's demeanor and the look on his face, when the game ended, and he came to shake Brady's hand? He looked a little confused to me. But yeah, he surely eventually realized the better team won. I do agree with everything you said about the different Pat's quarterbacks. Carry on!
There in lies the problem. Many are expecting the next Tom Brady, ... .
yeah cause, there will never be any such thing
 
Back
Top