FANTASTIC article about the Spygate non-issue

TrueBeliever

Hater hater
Joined
Sep 20, 2003
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
35
Points
48
Location
Wisconsin, eh
First, if the mods want to merge this into another thread that's fine, but I thought the simple, no BS approach of this article needs to be seen by as many Planeteers as possible.

Second, if you want to flame with haters, I have posted the article on digg.com at this address: http://digg.com/football/Shocking_Patriots_scandal_news_No_news

Third, I encourage Planeteers on other boards to use this article as a final word, "read this and STFU already!" link on other boards.

Fourth, there are several points in this article I would have put in bold, except that darn near every sentence would have been bold, so just read it already:

Shocking Patriots scandal news: No news

Matt Walsh, the former New England Patriots video assistant who has already worn out his welcome on the world stage, met with commissioner Roger Goodell Tuesday to talk about the famous tapes of other teams' coaching signals, and the word from Goodell was that he learned nothing new.

Again. The main NFL headline has been "No new info in 'Spygate'" for about six weeks running, except for the minor interruption of the draft.

Goodell said that Walsh was in the stadium when the St. Louis Rams did their pre-Super Bowl walkthrough in February 2002, and that he reported what he saw, including information about how the Rams were lining up, to Patriots coaches. But there is no videotape of the walk-through, as had been known since last week. The Boston Herald reported in February that such a video exists.

Walsh was off Tuesday afternoon to talk to Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., so we'll really get to the bottom of this thing now. Specter is the senior Republican on the Senate Pointless Grandstanding About NFL Issues Committee.

Here's the bottom of this thing: The Patriots cheated. They taped opposing coaches' signals so they could decipher them. It's not against the rules to steal signals, but for some strange reason it's against the rules to use video to do that. So the Patriots broke the rules. For this, they were caught, docked a first-round draft choice and fined heavily in the scheme of what you and I consider money, not so heavily in the scheme of what an NFL franchise considers money.

This was over last fall. Betty Grable didn't have legs like this.

The Patriots taping affair has to be the most overhyped "scandal" in NFL history, and this is a league that has turned pantomimed mooning into a scandal. If this had happened 25 years ago, it would be thought of as colorful chicanery, not a dastardly deed. See what you get for never smiling, Bill Belichick?

The scandal has become a religious issue. You either believe that the great Patriots teams of the past seven years were a fraud, were only as good as they were because they had stolen the other teams' signals, or you don't, and no amount of evidence or lack of same is ever going to get you to change your mind.

My religion is that I don't believe it. The Pats may have stolen some signals. I would be very disappointed in any football or baseball team I root for that never stole any signals, or at least never tried.

The Patriots broke a rule to do it, but the rule strikes me as a technicality. When the crime isn't what you do -- steal signals that are being made in front of 75,000 people -- but how you do it -- with video, rather than pen and paper -- then we're talking details, not bedrock values. If the Patriots had taped something they weren't supposed to see in the first place, that would have been a different story, a case of the team gaining a real advantage it shouldn't have had access to.

Or maybe not. The Patriots didn't exactly prove themselves adept spies. The Associated Press reports that the footage Walsh turned over included several minutes of the San Diego Chargers cheerleaders performing. The Patriots are in the same division as the Miami Dolphins, and they're taping the Chargers cheerleaders?

And just to get this out of the way because religious affiliations in this matter tend to dovetail with team fandom: I am a person with no rooting interest in the Patriots, and I have every reason to want the Patriots' success to be illegitimate. I picked the Rams in that Super Bowl, and my two favorite teams, the Rams and the Oakland Raiders, were the two most spectacular victims of the early years of the Patriots rivalry.

The Tuck Rule: Now that's a scandal. ― King Kaufman

:thumb: :clap: :Lecture: :p
 
One minor complaint: it would have been nice of him to mention also that Walsh was one of several Pats employees down on the field during the walkthrough, and they were there solely because the league switched to one week instead of two between the conference games and the Super Bowl because of 9/11.
 
"The Patriots broke a rule to do it, but the rule strikes me as a technicality. When the crime isn't what you do -- steal signals that are being made in front of 75,000 people -- but how you do it -- with video, rather than pen and paper -- then we're talking details, not bedrock values. If the Patriots had taped something they weren't supposed to see in the first place, that would have been a different story, a case of the team gaining a real advantage it shouldn't have had access to."

That is the best short summary of the real deal of SpyGate that I've read. It's why the sermonizers are all completely full of crap.
 
"The Patriots broke a rule to do it, but the rule strikes me as a technicality. When the crime isn't what you do -- steal signals that are being made in front of 75,000 people -- but how you do it -- with video, rather than pen and paper -- then we're talking details, not bedrock values. If the Patriots had taped something they weren't supposed to see in the first place, that would have been a different story, a case of the team gaining a real advantage it shouldn't have had access to."

That is the best short summary of the real deal of SpyGate that I've read. It's why the sermonizers are all completely full of crap.

I heard some p***k today on ESPN Radio who called in and said "What bothers me is that Belichick's response when he was caught was to run up the score on everybody. He never showed any contrition or humility."

For what, f**khead? For getting thrown under the bus for doing something probably 28 of the other 31 teams were doing? For getting called on the carpet as if he were the first member of a pro sports coaching staff who ever said, "You know, we could probably do something that's not exactly allowed by the rules and get away with it"?

Give me a break.
 
Plus just now I put on "Sportscenter" just to see what those douchebags would say, and sure enough, it's all, "well, Matt Walsh told the coaches he saw Marshall Faulk run back a kickoff, and in the Super Bowl Marshall Faulk DID return a kickoff just before the half, so the Patriots got an advantage that way."

Jesus H. Christ.
 
I heard some p***k today on ESPN Radio who called in and said "What bothers me is that Belichick's response when he was caught was to run up the score on everybody. He never showed any contrition or humility."

For what, f**khead? For getting thrown under the bus for doing something probably 28 of the other 31 teams were doing? For getting called on the carpet as if he were the first member of a pro sports coaching staff who ever said, "You know, we could probably do something that's not exactly allowed by the rules and get away with it"?

Give me a break.

Callers at WEEI and ESPN are often idiots but to complain that the Pats should not have won big in response to SpyGate is the height of insanity.

We learned in Arizona what happens when you let an inferior opponent hang around in a game.

Anyone who complains about another team winning big should be forced to become a Jets fan for life, though that my be going a little too far.
 
One minor complaint: it would have been nice of him to mention also that Walsh was one of several Pats employees down on the field during the walkthrough, and they were there solely because the league switched to one week instead of two between the conference games and the Super Bowl because of 9/11.

That, and the fact that Walsh was wearing clothing identifying him as Patriots' staff. Obviously the Rams weren't to concerned or they would have booted him.
 
How about this for a conspiracy theory:

Belichick worked with Walsh to orchestrate this entire thing after the Super Bowl. The reason is he knew there was nothing and this way he can get Goodell up on a press conference to state that Spygate was dead and the Patriots have done nothing. If not for Walsh, this Spygate issue probably would have never been discussed and would have been an open ended argument forever. Just wonderin'.
 
Funny thing is, Goodell said, "Matt told me he never wanted to be in the public eye because of this."

Then WHY did you start all this crap??? :suicide:
 
I thought this crap had already ended.

BB and the Pats org have already been punished.

Whats the problem?

Seriously.

Is it just that the media doesn't want to let it go or what?
 
I thought this crap had already ended.

BB and the Pats org have already been punished.

Whats the problem?



Seriously.

Is it just that the media doesn't want to let it go or what?

Just turn on ESPN any given day Dred
 
I stay as far away from BSPN as I can.

Its like the Fox news network of sports man.

"Fair and unbiased"... my ass.


Well there you go, why it is not going away
 
I thought this crap had already ended.

BB and the Pats org have already been punished.

Whats the problem?

Seriously.

Is it just that the media doesn't want to let it go or what?

That's exactly what it is Dred. If you're ESPN or any broadcast network, you're struggling to find any way at all to get people to tune in to your lame programming, and prolonging and exaggerating non-events is what they stoop to. It's not just ESPN and Spygate, it's any irrelevant issue of the day. Think Britney Spears, Roger Clemens( I mean, who really gives a flying fvck anyway), Barbara Walters vs Star Jones, Rosie the fat bitch O'Donnell saying anything at all. Just to name a few.
It's the same mentality that drives so many negative reports from Iraq and ignored any good things accomplished by our troops there. ( Read Harrison37 deployment thread for good things)

It used to be that the networks owned us. The internet changed all that, so now they need to throw impartiality and relevance out the window just to pay the help.
 
Back
Top