rivshark86
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2011
- Messages
- 1,884
- Reaction score
- 1,059
- Points
- 113
The Pats have had record setting offenses during the regular season over the past few years, and have revolutionized the passing game with the "Queen" of the field Gronk. However when you look at the offensive performances in the playoff losses in the past 4 years it becomes apparent that something is not translating to post Dec. play.
Ravens 2013: 28-13
Giants 2012: 21-17
Jets 2011: 28-21
Ravens 2011: 33-14
I am not going to go any farther back, but we all know what would await if I were to do so. In the past four years the offense has not put up more that 21 points against these tough defenses. I understand the argument that the team fields a top five offense every year, and resources need to go to defense. I even agree with it to some extent, but even if the D had held opponents to 22 points per game it would not have gotten the job done.
It seems to me the common thread between all of these games is that the opposing defenses have been able to take away the passing game by showing no respect at all to the long game and focusing entirely on the mid and short games. In addition to this not having an outside threat who can get out of bounds to stop the clock makes it harder to get down the field in situations where time is a constraint.
The catch is that Gronk has been out or limited for the last two playoff losses, and his presence could have very well changed everything. Still, with the ever present injuries at the TE position we needed a better backup plan than force feeding Welker, or his new injury prone replacement Danny Amendola.
I have no doubt the Pats will get significant production out of Amendola at points during the regular season, but I wonder if he can hold up down the stretch with the amount of hits he will be taking.
I guess all I'm trying to say is more than anything I like to see the Pats get Tom a big, fast, traditional outside receiver who can get down the field. Spikes, Mayo, and Hightower can stop the run, the pass D will give up yards but it will also get turnovers and key redzone stops. WR is what needs to be adressed in this draft.
Ravens 2013: 28-13
Giants 2012: 21-17
Jets 2011: 28-21
Ravens 2011: 33-14
I am not going to go any farther back, but we all know what would await if I were to do so. In the past four years the offense has not put up more that 21 points against these tough defenses. I understand the argument that the team fields a top five offense every year, and resources need to go to defense. I even agree with it to some extent, but even if the D had held opponents to 22 points per game it would not have gotten the job done.
It seems to me the common thread between all of these games is that the opposing defenses have been able to take away the passing game by showing no respect at all to the long game and focusing entirely on the mid and short games. In addition to this not having an outside threat who can get out of bounds to stop the clock makes it harder to get down the field in situations where time is a constraint.
The catch is that Gronk has been out or limited for the last two playoff losses, and his presence could have very well changed everything. Still, with the ever present injuries at the TE position we needed a better backup plan than force feeding Welker, or his new injury prone replacement Danny Amendola.
I have no doubt the Pats will get significant production out of Amendola at points during the regular season, but I wonder if he can hold up down the stretch with the amount of hits he will be taking.
I guess all I'm trying to say is more than anything I like to see the Pats get Tom a big, fast, traditional outside receiver who can get down the field. Spikes, Mayo, and Hightower can stop the run, the pass D will give up yards but it will also get turnovers and key redzone stops. WR is what needs to be adressed in this draft.