P4E* on 11-24-2007 at 04:17 PM said:I most admit im pissed at Mcnabb been out,with him and Westbrook in there,philly could have caused the pats a few problems on D.
shirtsleeve on 11-24-2007 at 04:12 PM said:Thanks Dan. Any word how Dawkins injury is affecting him? He's listed as probable.
Patriots4ever* on 11-24-2007 at 09:18 PM said::LOL:
You're kidding, right?
Dan Pires on 11-24-2007 at 04:19 PM said:Dawkins is both physically and mentally tough. He'll play. Still, it won't be enough.
TITAN126 on 11-24-2007 at 09:47 PM said:Am I the only one who thinks the Eagles have a better chance of winning without McNabb? Seriously, he sucks...Feely isn't great either but if I were an Eagles fan I'd rather have pretty much anyone over McNabb.
Rory on 11-24-2007 at 04:43 PM said:The line is skyrocketing. wow
P4E* on 11-24-2007 at 04:57 PM said:Dude,are you for real??..mcnabb is better than feeley,the only chance the eagles have of beating us is by running every play
Patriots4ever* on 11-24-2007 at 10:05 PM said:ROFL
Really, cut it out!
P4E* on 11-24-2007 at 05:10 PM said:Are you drunk bro??
every team with a decent QB and RB have a decent chance of beating anyone,it's all on the day,the eagles a good D and they could force turnovers,this game would of been intresting to watch,i would of still backed the pats to of beaten the eagles easy but,with mcnabb and westbrook it would of been better to watch,your not buying this at all are you bro??
without mcnabb 45-10
with mcnabb 37-17
Some credit - he loses a fine Superbowl while hungover and dehydrated.patsin°° on 11-24-2007 at 05:33 PM said:there better with mcnabb than without, no doubt in my mind...give the guy some credit
MercuryMorris on 11-24-2007 at 11:17 PM said:don't call me when you're in my town, call me when you're on my block!