AFAIK, Wilfork's 2014 cap hit breaks down as:
$3.6M final pro-ration of the $18M signing bonus from 2010
$7.5M base salary
$500k (+/-) various "other" bonuses (workout, weight, etc.)
So, the $3.6M is already in his pocket.
The $500k or so would probably be about the same, regardless, though different terms/goals.
At issue, then, is the $7.5M base.
"Restructuring" usually means some sort of extension, though it doesn't necessarily have to, I guess. It could mean a conversion of a chunk of the base into some incentives and a simple reduction on the remainder.
But, still, by the sound of the reports I've read, the Pats only "approached" Wilfork about re-structuring. They don't say that the Pats had something on the table. But Wilfork, again according to reports, has refused to consider any re-structuring.
IDK. Unless the Pats did have something on the table that was an insultingly low number, this seems like an extreme reaction on Wilfork's part.
$3.6M final pro-ration of the $18M signing bonus from 2010
$7.5M base salary
$500k (+/-) various "other" bonuses (workout, weight, etc.)
So, the $3.6M is already in his pocket.
The $500k or so would probably be about the same, regardless, though different terms/goals.
At issue, then, is the $7.5M base.
"Restructuring" usually means some sort of extension, though it doesn't necessarily have to, I guess. It could mean a conversion of a chunk of the base into some incentives and a simple reduction on the remainder.
But, still, by the sound of the reports I've read, the Pats only "approached" Wilfork about re-structuring. They don't say that the Pats had something on the table. But Wilfork, again according to reports, has refused to consider any re-structuring.
IDK. Unless the Pats did have something on the table that was an insultingly low number, this seems like an extreme reaction on Wilfork's part.