Their tears are delicious

Share this page

Yeah, I kind of resigned myself after the second half started out shaky, but I'm a bitter-ender. No way would I have stopped watching!

Mark Wahlberg loses all bragging rights, leaving at halftime! :mad:
 
BradyGirl said:
Yeah, I kind of resigned myself after the second half started out shaky, but I'm a bitter-ender. No way would I have stopped watching!

Mark Wahlberg loses all bragging rights, leaving at halftime! :mad:
Click to expand...
Wow didn't know he left. What a toolbag. I mean he's not just a random celeb... he's got legit connections to Boston and Tom. Epic fail.

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk
 
mooseontheloose said:
Wow didn't know he left. What a toolbag. I mean he's not just a random celeb... he's got legit connections to Boston and Tom. Epic fail.

Sent from my SM-N910W8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

He said his son was sick
 
I read too of the funniest . Superbowl 51 was rigged excuses. #1 The patriots cheated because in OT. A TV graphic at 12:02. Said patriots win the Super Bowl with a TD.
#2 knee gate James white knee was done before the ball broke the goal line.
 
There are still morons in Philly who think they were robbed of a Super Bowl by cheating.
-3 in turnovers = lost by 3. Must be cheating, right? It couldn't be the turnovers!

They were robbed by two fat guys who are bad at clock management (McNabb and Reid)

Bruschi watched 18 games worth of film on the Eagles, recognized a few formations, and called them out. This is not proof of cheating. It is proof of bad coaching on the Eagles side and good coaching on the Patriots side.

To stick with the cheating angle just shows how broken and pathetic these people are.

Marshall Faulk thinks Ty Law was out of position on purpose when Warner was pressured because walk through film showed him where the secret pass would go instead of pressure forcing inaccuracy. Faulk also refuses to go on a cruise in case he falls off the edge of the world.
 
skippyx said:
There are still morons in Philly who think they were robbed of a Super Bowl by cheating.
-3 in turnovers = lost by 3. Must be cheating, right? It couldn't be the turnovers!

They were robbed by two fat guys who are bad at clock management (McNabb and Reid)

Bruschi watched 18 games worth of film on the Eagles, recognized a few formations, and called them out. This is not proof of cheating. It is proof of bad coaching on the Eagles side and good coaching on the Patriots side.

To stick with the cheating angle just shows how broken and pathetic these people are.

Marshall Faulk thinks Ty Law was out of position on purpose when Warner was pressured because walk through film showed him where the secret pass would go instead of pressure forcing inaccuracy. Faulk also refuses to go on a cruise in case he falls off the edge of the world.
Click to expand...

Marshall Faulk crying about 2001 is the best part of SB week every time the Pats make it.
 
C5DfTuNUMAAVuia.jpg
 
Mazz22 said:
Marshall Faulk crying about 2001 is the best part of SB week every time the Pats make it.
Click to expand...

The best part for me this last time around was when Faulk inevitably brought out his whole "but Joe never lost one" line of crap and Bart Scott told him there is no way we could know what would happen in Montana had played in 3 more than he did.
 
O.Z.O. said:
The best part for me this last time around was when Faulk inevitably brought out his whole "but Joe never lost one" line of crap and Bart Scott told him there is no way we could know what would happen in Montana had played in 3 more than he did.
Click to expand...

I still love the Olympic Medals take. It,s the exact equivalent of medals. Tom has 5 gold & 2 silver to Joe's 4 Gold
 
BostonTim said:
I still love the Olympic Medals take. It,s the exact equivalent of medals. Tom has 5 gold & 2 silver to Joe's 4 Gold
Click to expand...

Don't these people realize that they actually give you a trophy for winning your conference?

I wonder how the Halas and Hunt families would take it if these people actually said to their faces that winning the trophy with Dad's name on it is a negative that counts against your career.

The whole argument is colossally stupid. Go for the stupid argument when you have nothing left, I guess.
 
OJ's Glove said:
Don't these people realize that they actually give you a trophy for winning your conference?

I wonder how the Halas and Hunt families would take it if these people actually said to their faces that winning the trophy with Dad's name on it is a negative that counts against your career.

The whole argument is colossally stupid. Go for the stupid argument when you have nothing left, I guess.
Click to expand...

Marshall Faulk is among the most bitter dead-enders.

I hope that he'll live with perpetual insomnia because of his impotent frustration.
 
Wasn't it Faulk that demanded to go in to return a kick-off late in that SB, and ended up mishandling a ball that appeared to be headed out of bounds?

That's what I think I remember, but my memory ain't what it used to be. I do remember thinking "What a complete A-hole!!"
 
INPatFan said:
Wasn't it Faulk that demanded to go in to return a kick-off late in that SB, and ended up mishandling a ball that appeared to be headed out of bounds?

That's what I think I remember, but my memory ain't what it used to be. I do remember thinking "What a complete A-hole!!"
Click to expand...

I clearly remember sitting by myself in the basement (couldn't stand to be upstairs cuz it was too loud) and watching AV kick off to Faulk with 00:04 on the clock. Don't remember if the kick was heading out of bounds but I'm researching the play on the internet and no one seems to remember the kick off. Everyone seems to think that time expired after the FG.

Am I losing it?
 
patfan64 said:
I clearly remember sitting by myself in the basement (couldn't stand to be upstairs cuz it was too loud) and watching AV kick off to Faulk with 00:04 on the clock. Don't remember if the kick was heading out of bounds but I'm researching the play on the internet and no one seems to remember the kick off. Everyone seems to think that time expired after the FG.

Am I losing it?
Click to expand...

It did-

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/eawwO1moIIE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
benhamean said:
Marshall Faulk is among the most bitter dead-enders.

I hope that he'll live with perpetual insomnia because of his impotent frustration.
Click to expand...

He is, but I really do believe that a number of the regular haterz have finally given up the ghost and sort of love us now. At least that is my assessment of the national media. We've got a grudging admiration thing going that we never had before. Coming back against Atlanta blew a lot of minds.

Faulk is never going to quit though. He's like a Japanese soldier holed up in a bunker in 1960 refusing to believe that WWII is over.

The day Marshall Faulk bows down to our greatness we will all know it's finally over, because he's never been right about anything.
 
Darth Despot said:
There was a bit of bitching by Rams fans that there should have been a kickoff since the kick went through the uprights with about 3 or 4 seconds left on the clock, but the refs said the game was over.
Click to expand...

They wanted to put Martz out of his misery. It was a good call.
 
PF 64 you may be thinking of the Panthers kick back to the Pats after they scored to tie the game in SB 38 that was out of bounds and set up the Pats to quickly march it down and score the game winner.

lol we get our SBs confused.

#patsfanproblems
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top