LiveFromNY
Indystar refugee
http://www.sportsgamer.com/content/1603/madden-09-quarterback-ratings
Honestly, why do people make such a big deal over these ratings? This has got to be the single-worst "rating" system EVER, it just makes absolutely NO sense.
First off, it's the most politically correct, gutless rating system ever (don't want to upset any of the fans buying it afterall) - not to mention it makes absolutely NO SENSE AT ALL. What exactly does it mean for a QB (Palmer) to be rated 96 - what does 96 measure? And how does a number like 96 account for the GIGANTIC discrepancy in terms of real world performance between 96 (Palmer) and Manning / Brady at 99?
How is Rex Grossman 79 overall? Why isn't he 40-something? These numbers are COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS. If you're going to rate players, at least use the full rating scale to make it apparent, the differences in ability between players. And how do they come up with ratings for passing and receiving for long snappers? Most people would intuitively think 79/100 would ordinarily be pretty damn good - if Manning and Brady are 100 and an undrafted rookie QB from a small college is 0, one would think 79 would be more appropriate for someone like Bulger, who is very good but not great - which is what 79/100 should mean, if it means anything at all!
The Madden rating system is a joke, and it's glaringly OBVIOUS that the numbers do not reflect the way the players are implemented in the game (most QBs in this game have a different "feel" unique to them - they probably don't even use the rating system whatsoever in implementing game engine mechanics) so it's effectively nothing more than a PR sheet to placate all the fans out there. I don't even know why I'm making a big deal over it, I guess it's becasue I keep seeing idiots from other message boards make such a big deal over - going so far as to say "QB A is better than QB B - see the Madden 09 ratings" ...and actually MEAN it too WTF?
Madden ratings remind me of Four Seasons condom sizes where everyone is either large, very large, extra large, or extra extra large. Thus concludes my pet peeve for the day.
Honestly, why do people make such a big deal over these ratings? This has got to be the single-worst "rating" system EVER, it just makes absolutely NO sense.
First off, it's the most politically correct, gutless rating system ever (don't want to upset any of the fans buying it afterall) - not to mention it makes absolutely NO SENSE AT ALL. What exactly does it mean for a QB (Palmer) to be rated 96 - what does 96 measure? And how does a number like 96 account for the GIGANTIC discrepancy in terms of real world performance between 96 (Palmer) and Manning / Brady at 99?
How is Rex Grossman 79 overall? Why isn't he 40-something? These numbers are COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS. If you're going to rate players, at least use the full rating scale to make it apparent, the differences in ability between players. And how do they come up with ratings for passing and receiving for long snappers? Most people would intuitively think 79/100 would ordinarily be pretty damn good - if Manning and Brady are 100 and an undrafted rookie QB from a small college is 0, one would think 79 would be more appropriate for someone like Bulger, who is very good but not great - which is what 79/100 should mean, if it means anything at all!
The Madden rating system is a joke, and it's glaringly OBVIOUS that the numbers do not reflect the way the players are implemented in the game (most QBs in this game have a different "feel" unique to them - they probably don't even use the rating system whatsoever in implementing game engine mechanics) so it's effectively nothing more than a PR sheet to placate all the fans out there. I don't even know why I'm making a big deal over it, I guess it's becasue I keep seeing idiots from other message boards make such a big deal over - going so far as to say "QB A is better than QB B - see the Madden 09 ratings" ...and actually MEAN it too WTF?
Madden ratings remind me of Four Seasons condom sizes where everyone is either large, very large, extra large, or extra extra large. Thus concludes my pet peeve for the day.