1. Belichick did literally nothing special.
2. For all the rush yards the Pats had, they only put up 14 points.
3. If Diggs catches that TD pass - which he does 99 times out of 100 - no one is talking about Belichick at all today. Because the Bills would have won.
4. Quite frankly I think Belichick's gameplan was shit. He ran it almost 50 times, only scored 14 points, and it took the Bills a dropped TD, two dropped first downs, and a fumble where no one touched the RB, for the Pats to win by 4.
1. What Belichick did hasn't been done in the last 4 DECADES. "Literally nothing special", yet no one else is willing or able to do it. You can't honestly believe this, can you?
2. And the Bills only put up 10, and 7 of those were directly caused by a ball grazing Harry's facemask by less than an inch.
3. If we're setting aide one mistake, let's also set aside Harry's mistake, and then hey, suddenly the outcome is still the same. Unless you have a time machine then all the "ifs" in the world don't matter, because they Didn't Happen. Diggs catches that TD 99 times of 100, but it's also not gusting up to 55 mph 99 times of 100. The ball was clearly driven off course, the attempt was made to adjust, it was unsuccessful. The idea as well that Diggs scoring a TD there would have Zero Impact on the way the rest of the game was called or played is absurd. As is presuming that the net result of that impact can be neatly inferred, by the same folks who predicted a Bills win which did not come to pass.
4. McDermott passed 30 times, 15 of those being 0 yard gains. Do you find that game plan to be better? McDermott's got him 8 drives where zero points were scored, a FG, and a TD. Bill's got him 6 (one of which was running the clock down to 0), 2 FGs, and a TD. It took a grazing of a facemask and a phantom RTP penalty for the Bills to get ANY points on board. The TD was dropped because the wind, which Belichick adjusted for better than McDermott did. The fumble and two dropped first downs? Also because of the wind, which Buffalo was trying to ignore instead of playing around. The Pats won by 4, but it's also fair to say they scored 40% more than the opponent, and it was as close to 3-14 as it was to 17-14. If you think McDermott should just do what he did over and over again and hope for a better result, I hope you in turn are prepared for a LOT of disappointments.
At the end of the day, ask yourself - are you really hoping the next time the Patriots and Bills play, this game is put on repeat? That the conditions are equally terrible, and McDermott and Belichick follow the same gameplans, and you have confidence it'll end in a better result for the Bills? Personally I doubt it.