Oh Gisele, she claims Tom has had concussions

Share this page

bishbash

bishbash

Tall Earthquake Finders roam the desert
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
5,734
Reaction score
2,458
Points
113
Location
SWNH
In interview with Charlie Rose, Gisele claims Tom had concussion last year and more other years. Cue up Goodell
 
Brady suspended for 6 games, Bill suspended for a full season, Patriots stripped of all draft picks for next year, Patriots forced to trade Jimmy G

I think that's fair punishment, right? :coffee:
 
Way to go Giselle . Goodell going to fine the pats now for not reporting a injury .
 
Can we all agree that she is the equivalent of Yoko Ono? Is it too much to ask for you to keep your mouth shut and just look hot?


http://nesn.com/2017/05/tom-brady-had-a-concussion-last-season-gisele-bundchen-reveals-on-cbs/


Well, it was only a matter of time before the next New England Patriots controversy. Gisele Bundchen revealed on “CBS This Morning” that her husband, Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, suffered a concussion last season. “As a wife, I’m a little bit — as you know, it’s not the most … unaggressive sport,” Bundchen told Charlie Rose. “Football, like he had a concussion last year. I mean, he has concussions, pretty much — I mean, we don’t talk it, but he does have concussions. I don’t think it’s a healthy thing for your body to go through that kind of aggression all the time. That cannot be healthy for you, right? I’m planning on having him be healthy and do a lot of fun things when we’re like 100, I hope.” Brady was never listed on the Patriots’ injury report with a concussion last season. Brady was asked in December 2015 on WEEI’s “Dennis, Callahan and Minihane” how many concussions he’s suffered. “I’d really not like to get into that,” Brady answered.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NEW?src=hash">#NEW</a>: <a href="https://twitter.com/giseleofficial">@giseleofficial</a> told <a href="https://twitter.com/charlierose">@CharlieRose</a> on <a href="https://twitter.com/CBSThisMorning">@CBSThisMorning</a> that Tom Brady had a concussion last year. "He does have concussions." <a href="https://t.co/K4B8ixDN9X">pic.twitter.com/K4B8ixDN9X</a></p>— CBS This Morning (@CBSThisMorning) <a href="https://twitter.com/CBSThisMorning/status/864826656845963265">May 17, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
If she has her way. This will be his last in The NFL. Let's hope this don't start to get a lot of media attention. Cough ESPN cough .
 
OJ's Glove said:
Who cares.

If he was never limited in practice, it's not an issue. She's not a doctor.
Click to expand...

Agreed. The NFL couldn't find any solid evidence that Brady had a part in deflating footballs and nothing ever came of that...oh wait...
 
Alk said:
Agreed. The NFL couldn't find any solid evidence that Brady had a part in deflating footballs and nothing ever came of that...oh wait...
Click to expand...

If you think they'll start another witch hunt against this particular team after the horrible, lengthy PR disaster the last one was, you're wrong.

The other 31 want nothing to do with extensive scrutiny of injury reporting.
 
How Brady got his concussions:

Brady-cliff-jump-331-03-30-15.png


gisele-bundchen-tom-brady-vacation-photos91-480w.jpg


d6f64a26b546c21bb38fd193854c10c0.jpg


hqdefault.jpg
 
OJ's Glove said:
If you think they'll start another witch hunt against this particular team after the horrible, lengthy PR disaster the last one was, you're wrong.

The other 31 want nothing to do with extensive scrutiny of injury reporting.
Click to expand...

I won't put anything past Goodell and the rest of the owners. Because "integrity."
 
Alk said:
I won't put anything past Goodell and the rest of the owners. Because "integrity."
Click to expand...

I get your sentiment.

But they're not going to touch the hot stove while they're still licking the burns on their fingers from last time.

Goodell might eff with another team next because he's unethical and stupid, but it wont be the Patriots. They don't want it.
 
OJ's Glove said:
I
But they're not going to touch the hot stove while they're still licking the burns on their fingers from last time.
Click to expand...
What? The league got exactly what it wanted? They don't have to follow the CBA fpr punishments, they don't have to use the same level of punishment for the same offense, they don't need proof of anything to punish, and the person being punished doesn't actually have to do anything wrong. They only have to say that a player was more likely than not to have known something was being done.

They aren't licking their fingers after being burned. They are probably still putting salve on their palms from all the high-fiving they've been doing.

OJ's Glove said:
Goodell might eff with another team next because he's unethical and stupid, but it wont be the Patriots. They don't want it.
Click to expand...
You mean that once they take away the Patriots' first round pick for charging them with the wrong thing (spying vs filming from the wrong location) the Patriots are now safe from losing another first round pick to another bogus investigation?
 
OJ's Glove said:
I get your sentiment.

But they're not going to touch the hot stove while they're still licking the burns on their fingers from last time.

Goodell might eff with another team next because he's unethical and stupid, but it wont be the Patriots. They don't want it.
Click to expand...

I think you are mistaken. Most people believe the Pats, and especially Brady, are cheaters. The 31 want nothing more than to see the Pats knocked down. Goodell suspended Brady for 4 games and he still won the SB. A repeat offender will get 6 games minimum.
 
spacecrime said:
What? The league got exactly what it wanted? They don't have to follow the CBA fpr punishments, they don't have to use the same level of punishment for the same offense, they don't need proof of anything to punish, and the person being punished doesn't actually have to do anything wrong. They only have to say that a player was more likely than not to have known something was being done.

They aren't licking their fingers after being burned. They are probably still putting salve on their palms from all the high-fiving they've been doing.
Click to expand...

No, no, no.

It was a legal/CBA victory.

The PR was a lengthy, complete disaster because TB refused to just sit there and get railroaded. Roger is a laughingstock even more now than he was before they launched it. Nearly all observers with the benefit of hindsight consider it a complete joke.

They're not going there again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top