chevss454
Data-driven decision-making is science and art.
Great post.
I'm going to drop the "Parkour speed test" idea, but at least I got it out of my system.
I'm going to be really curious to see how MHJ turns out. I feel like he's definitely going to be good, but I'm wondering if he doesn't become more
Keyshawn Johnson good than Calvin Johnson great. Like he doesn't have any discernable weaknesses, but might not really have a combo of
traits that will make him dominant in the NFL like many assume. There are some draft people that are speculating that he might not even be a sure thing to be
the top WR, but you hear all kinds of crazy shit in the run-up to the draft.
He'd certainly be light years better than anybody we've had since Randy, but I'd prefer to address protection and QB earlier and it really
looks like there should be some good WRs left by that 68th pick.
I'd LOVE to fix all 3 of the big needs, but feel like that might be a stretch in one draft.
Thanks, Hawg. Means something coming from you.
I should have mentioned in that post that 10 yd split can be the most impt part of the 40 for some WRs and shouldn't be overlooked. Cooper Kupp made a living off his 10 yd split.
Funny you mention Keyshawn Johnson since a few scouts I know have Keyshawn as a comp for MHJ.
For me the order for draft day would ideally be QB then OT then WR. Any mock I've done have the 5-6 best OTs gone long before the WRs cupboard is bare.
I can find a good WR or TE in rnd 3 or 4 but I can't find a good OT in those rounds.
Last edited: