thomas144
Bandwagon Fan
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2004
- Messages
- 7,454
- Reaction score
- 275
- Points
- 83
- Age
- 71
- Location
- Winchester, MA
- Website
- www.mudelephant.com
I had a mixed reaction to the article. It still perpetuates the myth of Spygate and doesn't put it into the proper context.
The rest of it was excellent.
Great Article. Quick, post it on OrangeMane and watch the excuses fly!
Right here.Great read.
Where's that BSpolice guy?
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...rs-vikings-produced-a-far-different-reaction/Right here.
The article references some of the sources that have already been linked for me. I'm in the midst of travelling to Denver for the game this weekend, but I will absolutely read through them and weigh them accordingly.
One thing I disagree with is the assessment that because the alleged attempt at cheating was either unsuccessful or unimportant, that it doesn't merit a significant punishment.
In any and all cases, I believe the intent to cheat is much more important than how successful an attempt is. If a kid uses a cheat sheet that has all the wrong answers he should be punished for cheating even if it ultimately gave no advantage.
I swear to God Jesus Christ could have a press conference next to the President of the United States and in the front of Congress and tell the world that you all owe the Patriots a huge apology especially to Tom Brady. That the DF was nothing more than a sham to drag Tom Brady's name through the mud and to take away Patriots draft picks so the other 31 teams have a better shot at parity. Suck it haters
The haters would just say Bob Kraft paid off Jesus to say that.
I know most of you will say that I'm just biased against the Patriots, but this really is a totally different situation. If the Deflategate stuff were true, Tom Brady had equipment guys secretly altering the conditions of the game balls after the refs had inspected them to allegedly play with a psi not permitted by NFL rules to gain a competitive advantage.http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...rs-vikings-produced-a-far-different-reaction/
Caught red handed, however not the Patriots.
One thing I disagree with is the assessment that because the alleged attempt at cheating was either unsuccessful or unimportant, that it doesn't merit a significant punishment.
I know most of you will say that I'm just biased against the Patriots, but this really is a totally different situation. If the Deflategate stuff were true, Tom Brady had equipment guys secretly altering the conditions of the game balls after the refs had inspected them to allegedly play with a psi not permitted by NFL rules to gain a competitive advantage.
The Vikings and Panthers were putting balls near a heater on a cold day in front of everyone. Yes, this affected the air pressure, and yes it's not permitted, but it's missing the intent to knowingly do something outside the rules and hide it to avoid getting caught.
Right here. The article references some of the sources that have already been linked for me. I'm in the midst of travelling to Denver for the game this weekend, but I will absolutely read through them and weigh them accordingly. One thing I disagree with is the assessment that because the alleged attempt at cheating was either unsuccessful or unimportant, that it doesn't merit a significant punishment. In any and all cases, I believe the intent to cheat is much more important than how successful an attempt is. If a kid uses a cheat sheet that has all the wrong answers he should be punished for cheating even if it ultimately gave no advantage.
Great read.
Where's that BSpolice guy?