The Fitness Thread

I bought this:


Love it. I mountain bike frequently during the spring/summer/fall, and now train with this.

The screen is redunkulous. I ride though the Italian countryside, the streets and along the canals of Amsterdam, etc.
The subscription is free for a year and when that’s up it’s far cheaper than Peloton.

I do quite a bit of band/kettlebell work, but not as much as just riding the bike.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
I bought this:


Love it. I mountain bike frequently during the spring/summer/fall, and now train with this.

The screen is redunkulous. I ride though the Italian countryside, the streets and along the canals of Amsterdam, etc.
The subscription is free for a year and when that’s up it’s far cheaper than Peloton.

I do quite a bit of band/kettlebell work, but not as much as just riding the bike.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That’s very cool by the way....

I “hike” not like I use to but as best I can. I walk a ton. But I also play golf and walk my fave, when time permits. I admit I can’t carry anymore but I can pull still. I still skate, and ski occasionally. I’m ok with a tread mill or a stationary bike In the winter. Somethings are more challenging then others for me but my physical therapist has adjusted most of my go to‘s and my psychical capabilities these days.

~Dee~
 
Last edited:
I hear you. It can be mind numbingly boring. I made a contraption that holds my phone horizontally on the tread mill using a part of a metal hanger duck taped to a cheap phone case and old AirPods. This, combined with a YouTubeTV subscription, allows me to watch whatever I want for 30 mins which drastically cuts down on the boredom.

Every once in a while I forget it and I just dread the run without it.View attachment 10264
You had me at golf channel lol

~Dee~
 
So a question for all of you. Protein powder. Yay or nay? My son has encouraged me to start using it but I don't work out six days a week two hours at a time. I have heard that it can help lose weight but I thought the idea behind it was to build muscle. 🤷‍♂️
 
So a question for all of you. Protein powder. Yay or nay? My son has encouraged me to start using it but I don't work out six days a week two hours at a time. I have heard that it can help lose weight but I thought the idea behind it was to build muscle. 🤷‍♂️
The best way to lose weight is still to eat less food, now combined with a shortened time of day when you eat (one or two meals). Exercise is great for fitness and overall physical, mental and emotional health, but not so hot as a weight loss regimen. As we used to say, "You can't outrun your fork."
 
So a question for all of you. Protein powder. Yay or nay? My son has encouraged me to start using it but I don't work out six days a week two hours at a time. I have heard that it can help lose weight but I thought the idea behind it was to build muscle. 🤷‍♂️
Some of it is good. Depends on the quality.
 
The best way to lose weight is still to eat less food, now combined with a shortened time of day when you eat (one or two meals). Exercise is great for fitness and overall physical, mental and emotional health, but not so hot as a weight loss regimen. As we used to say, "You can't outrun your fork."
This has been the philosophy that I have learned.

I'm not going to say anything anyone wants to do is wrong. Everyone needs to do what works for them. So the following is what has been working for me. It might sound preachy, but it's not meant to be. This is not a religion and everyone needs to find their own path.

Next to What you eat, How often you eat is far more important that how much you eat.

Extra weight is driven completely by hormones. Calories are a deeply flawed concept and calorie counting is a useless exercise. What you eat determines how the hormones in your body respond and whether it is in fat storage or fat burning mode. How often you eat will influence how much those fat storage hormones are in an elevated state.

As said, exercise is good for fitness. Muscle building is good for increasing your base metabolism. But getting a handle on what and how often you eat will provide the most progress for fat loss.
 
great thread. i'm sort of plateauing too. used to weigh a bit less, and at that time, worked out less. i am in the best shape i've ever been in strength and endurance wise, but would love to lose a bit more body fat i didn't have 4 years ago. i know i'm at the point where i don't want to work out any more (time wise), and i do enough different types of workouts, and change routines enough that i'm not "muscle bored"(i don't think). i do hot yoga. bike, climb, barre, trampoline, & hiit right now. a few of those utilize weights. about 12 hrs/week for exercising. to me, this means the other side of the equation (diet) needs some adjusting.i'd love to hear more about your eating approach, u.t. and anyone else as well. i keep in mind that an approach that works for men may not work for women too due to hormones, etc.
 
I'm not going to say anything anyone wants to do is wrong. Everyone needs to do what works for them. So the following is what has been working for me. It might sound preachy, but it's not meant to be. This is not a religion and everyone needs to find their own path.

Next to What you eat, How often you eat is far more important that how much you eat.
Yes, definitely. I didn't mean to come across as dictatorial.

I did a ton of reading since the time of the old ketosis thread, and what I learned then and have had driven home to me by recent research and my own experience is that hormones do drive the entire body, including fat storage and burning. If you accept this, then you will see why counting calories doesn't work very well.

We all learned in grade school that the body stores fat to stay nourished when food isn't available, and the body will use this fat when no food is available. The hormone that decides when the body stores fat and when it uses fat is insulin. This process worked to perfection for millennia...until agriculture. Before that point, life was basically feast or famine, so it was easy for insulin to judge: is there food coming into the stomach? If so, then it's time to store fat, and the mechanism to burn body fat was shut off, and the mechanism to store fat was turned on. If the body went 12 to 24 hours (research generally showed the switch point to abut 16 - 18 hours) without eating, then insulin flipped the switches.

The problem with that system is that we now have food available all the time. We rarely hit the point anymore where we regularly don't eat for 16+ hours.

What worked for me over the last 3-4 years is that I went on-and-off of a system of only eating for 4 to 8 hours a day. I brought my weight from the 280's down to the 250's. But I couldn't maintain it and kept falling off the diet, and the weight crept up to a high point of 295. I did NOT want to hit 300, and got very strict with what I ate and when I ate. I found that how much I ate was nearly irrelevant as long as I ate whole foods (not starchy foods like underground veggies) went 20 hours every day without eating. Also, no sugary foods, (including assumed-to-be-healthy foods like honey and most fruits). Two meals a day making sure I finished the second meal no more that four hours after I started the first meal.

I got down into the high 220's and again went back to my old eating patterns. I eat better now but my weight has been creeping up so that this morning I was 262. But I finally figured out the problem. I was giving up something I wanted (bread, most fruit, starchy veggies), and I would 'reward' myself with an occasional pizza or ice cream cone so I always felt deprive and retained the desire to eat the wrong kind of food.

When I quit smoking in 1981 and quit drinking in 1989, it wasn't this way. I simply became (after a couple of years each time) a person who didn't smoke and didn't drink. Regarding food, I am still a person who would enjoy spaghetti and garlic toast, but I can't eat it because I need to lose weight.

What I need to be is a person who doesn't eat crap. I'm not sure I can do it, but I better decide soon, as I'm about to leave soon for 5 weeks of traveling with no kitchen facilities. 5 weeks of restaurant food. I know I can avoid coming home at 300+ pounds, but I don't want to gain anything.

I know what will work for me, Whether or not it works for you depends on whatever.

Oh, and I believe that while losing weight and getting fit are related and both are good for you, I think the processes aren't the same and care must be taken not to ruin one while focusing on the other. (But I still believe I can't outrun your fork. I ran 40-50 miles a week for several years in the 70's and early 80's proving that to myself.)
 
Yes, definitely. I didn't mean to come across as dictatorial.

I did a ton of reading since the time of the old ketosis thread, and what I learned then and have had driven home to me by recent research and my own experience is that hormones do drive the entire body, including fat storage and burning. If you accept this, then you will see why counting calories doesn't work very well.

We all learned in grade school that the body stores fat to stay nourished when food isn't available, and the body will use this fat when no food is available. The hormone that decides when the body stores fat and when it uses fat is insulin. This process worked to perfection for millennia...until agriculture. Before that point, life was basically feast or famine, so it was easy for insulin to judge: is there food coming into the stomach? If so, then it's time to store fat, and the mechanism to burn body fat was shut off, and the mechanism to store fat was turned on. If the body went 12 to 24 hours (research generally showed the switch point to abut 16 - 18 hours) without eating, then insulin flipped the switches.

The problem with that system is that we now have food available all the time. We rarely hit the point anymore where we regularly don't eat for 16+ hours.

What worked for me over the last 3-4 years is that I went on-and-off of a system of only eating for 4 to 8 hours a day. I brought my weight from the 280's down to the 250's. But I couldn't maintain it and kept falling off the diet, and the weight crept up to a high point of 295. I did NOT want to hit 300, and got very strict with what I ate and when I ate. I found that how much I ate was nearly irrelevant as long as I ate whole foods (not starchy foods like underground veggies) went 20 hours every day without eating. Also, no sugary foods, (including assumed-to-be-healthy foods like honey and most fruits). Two meals a day making sure I finished the second meal no more that four hours after I started the first meal.

I got down into the high 220's and again went back to my old eating patterns. I eat better now but my weight has been creeping up so that this morning I was 262. But I finally figured out the problem. I was giving up something I wanted (bread, most fruit, starchy veggies), and I would 'reward' myself with an occasional pizza or ice cream cone so I always felt deprive and retained the desire to eat the wrong kind of food.

When I quit smoking in 1981 and quit drinking in 1989, it wasn't this way. I simply became (after a couple of years each time) a person who didn't smoke and didn't drink. Regarding food, I am still a person who would enjoy spaghetti and garlic toast, but I can't eat it because I need to lose weight.

What I need to be is a person who doesn't eat crap. I'm not sure I can do it, but I better decide soon, as I'm about to leave soon for 5 weeks of traveling with no kitchen facilities. 5 weeks of restaurant food. I know I can avoid coming home at 300+ pounds, but I don't want to gain anything.

I know what will work for me, Whether or not it works for you depends on whatever.

Oh, and I believe that while losing weight and getting fit are related and both are good for you, I think the processes aren't the same and care must be taken not to ruin one while focusing on the other. (But I still believe I can't outrun your fork. I ran 40-50 miles a week for several years in the 70's and early 80's proving that to myself.)
Good luck and all the best.
 
Yes, definitely. I didn't mean to come across as dictatorial.

I did a ton of reading since the time of the old ketosis thread, and what I learned then and have had driven home to me by recent research and my own experience is that hormones do drive the entire body, including fat storage and burning. If you accept this, then you will see why counting calories doesn't work very well.

We all learned in grade school that the body stores fat to stay nourished when food isn't available, and the body will use this fat when no food is available. The hormone that decides when the body stores fat and when it uses fat is insulin. This process worked to perfection for millennia...until agriculture. Before that point, life was basically feast or famine, so it was easy for insulin to judge: is there food coming into the stomach? If so, then it's time to store fat, and the mechanism to burn body fat was shut off, and the mechanism to store fat was turned on. If the body went 12 to 24 hours (research generally showed the switch point to abut 16 - 18 hours) without eating, then insulin flipped the switches.

The problem with that system is that we now have food available all the time. We rarely hit the point anymore where we regularly don't eat for 16+ hours.

What worked for me over the last 3-4 years is that I went on-and-off of a system of only eating for 4 to 8 hours a day. I brought my weight from the 280's down to the 250's. But I couldn't maintain it and kept falling off the diet, and the weight crept up to a high point of 295. I did NOT want to hit 300, and got very strict with what I ate and when I ate. I found that how much I ate was nearly irrelevant as long as I ate whole foods (not starchy foods like underground veggies) went 20 hours every day without eating. Also, no sugary foods, (including assumed-to-be-healthy foods like honey and most fruits). Two meals a day making sure I finished the second meal no more that four hours after I started the first meal.

I got down into the high 220's and again went back to my old eating patterns. I eat better now but my weight has been creeping up so that this morning I was 262. But I finally figured out the problem. I was giving up something I wanted (bread, most fruit, starchy veggies), and I would 'reward' myself with an occasional pizza or ice cream cone so I always felt deprive and retained the desire to eat the wrong kind of food.

When I quit smoking in 1981 and quit drinking in 1989, it wasn't this way. I simply became (after a couple of years each time) a person who didn't smoke and didn't drink. Regarding food, I am still a person who would enjoy spaghetti and garlic toast, but I can't eat it because I need to lose weight.

What I need to be is a person who doesn't eat crap. I'm not sure I can do it, but I better decide soon, as I'm about to leave soon for 5 weeks of traveling with no kitchen facilities. 5 weeks of restaurant food. I know I can avoid coming home at 300+ pounds, but I don't want to gain anything.

I know what will work for me, Whether or not it works for you depends on whatever.

Oh, and I believe that while losing weight and getting fit are related and both are good for you, I think the processes aren't the same and care must be taken not to ruin one while focusing on the other. (But I still believe I can't outrun your fork. I ran 40-50 miles a week for several years in the 70's and early 80's proving that to myself.)

Very interesting. For many years I ate nothing all day and feasted on whatever my heart desired for dinner. Not because I was trying to diet but because I would get lethargic after eating and in the fast paced and physical world of the business I ran, that would not do.

During those years I maintained a perfect fighting weight for me of around 200 lbs.

When I retired that routine went with it and I gained over a 100 lbs for various reasons including a medication I was taking.

Fast forward to last year when my lifestyle changed and I ate in a similar manner as those other 20 years. I lost 100 pounds in 10 months without even trying.

I've always been very healthy test wise, and now I'm super healthy confounding my doctors considering all the destruction I leveraged and still do to a degree against this body.

Very interesting. Thanks for sharing that info.
 
Very interesting. For many years I ate nothing all day and feasted on whatever my heart desired for dinner. Not because I was trying to diet but because I would get lethargic after eating and in the fast paced and physical world of the business I ran, that would not do.

During those years I maintained a perfect fighting weight for me of around 200 lbs.

When I retired that routine went with it and I gained over a 100 lbs for various reasons including a medication I was taking.

Fast forward to last year when my lifestyle changed and I ate in a similar manner as those other 20 years. I lost 100 pounds in 10 months without even trying.

I've always been very healthy test wise, and now I'm super healthy confounding my doctors considering all the destruction I leveraged and still do to a degree against this body.

Very interesting. Thanks for sharing that info.

Oh, an my very lovely lady friend always eats in this manner. And to use her term, it's how she keeps her girlish figure at 44. And what a great figure it is. 😊
 
Yes, definitely. I didn't mean to come across as dictatorial.

I did a ton of reading since the time of the old ketosis thread, and what I learned then and have had driven home to me by recent research and my own experience is that hormones do drive the entire body, including fat storage and burning. If you accept this, then you will see why counting calories doesn't work very well.

We all learned in grade school that the body stores fat to stay nourished when food isn't available, and the body will use this fat when no food is available. The hormone that decides when the body stores fat and when it uses fat is insulin. This process worked to perfection for millennia...until agriculture. Before that point, life was basically feast or famine, so it was easy for insulin to judge: is there food coming into the stomach? If so, then it's time to store fat, and the mechanism to burn body fat was shut off, and the mechanism to store fat was turned on. If the body went 12 to 24 hours (research generally showed the switch point to abut 16 - 18 hours) without eating, then insulin flipped the switches.

The problem with that system is that we now have food available all the time. We rarely hit the point anymore where we regularly don't eat for 16+ hours.

What worked for me over the last 3-4 years is that I went on-and-off of a system of only eating for 4 to 8 hours a day. I brought my weight from the 280's down to the 250's. But I couldn't maintain it and kept falling off the diet, and the weight crept up to a high point of 295. I did NOT want to hit 300, and got very strict with what I ate and when I ate. I found that how much I ate was nearly irrelevant as long as I ate whole foods (not starchy foods like underground veggies) went 20 hours every day without eating. Also, no sugary foods, (including assumed-to-be-healthy foods like honey and most fruits). Two meals a day making sure I finished the second meal no more that four hours after I started the first meal.

I got down into the high 220's and again went back to my old eating patterns. I eat better now but my weight has been creeping up so that this morning I was 262. But I finally figured out the problem. I was giving up something I wanted (bread, most fruit, starchy veggies), and I would 'reward' myself with an occasional pizza or ice cream cone so I always felt deprive and retained the desire to eat the wrong kind of food.

When I quit smoking in 1981 and quit drinking in 1989, it wasn't this way. I simply became (after a couple of years each time) a person who didn't smoke and didn't drink. Regarding food, I am still a person who would enjoy spaghetti and garlic toast, but I can't eat it because I need to lose weight.

What I need to be is a person who doesn't eat crap. I'm not sure I can do it, but I better decide soon, as I'm about to leave soon for 5 weeks of traveling with no kitchen facilities. 5 weeks of restaurant food. I know I can avoid coming home at 300+ pounds, but I don't want to gain anything.

I know what will work for me, Whether or not it works for you depends on whatever.

Oh, and I believe that while losing weight and getting fit are related and both are good for you, I think the processes aren't the same and care must be taken not to ruin one while focusing on the other. (But I still believe I can't outrun your fork. I ran 40-50 miles a week for several years in the 70's and early 80's proving that to myself.)

I think what both you and UT stated are probably mostly correct. To me though it seems overly complicated and difficult to follow requiring schedules for eating that compete with other important things that occupy my daily life (work, family and social events). I was very active coaching and playing for years at around 240 pounds. I am 6'1". A few years ago we got back from a family vacation and I was looking though photos and I nearly shit. Fat. So I decided to keep it simple and started tracking calories in the My Fitness Pal app. Using this tool gave me a simple way to track the calories I was eating as well as the calories I was expending via exorcize. Being aware of the simple math of calories in/calories out motivated me on both sides of the equation. I ate better foods and I exorcized more with many days working out to ZERO there by netting out to a caloric number of negative 1500-2000/day. Weight loss will happen. I also vastly upgraded my vitamins and supplement intake (bonus covid protection!). Size 40/32 button flys soon became 34/32. It was very simple math that was easy to track and it worked for me.

I am sure that the better eating habits happened to have some of the benefits described by SC above, but I never worried about it. Just win the calorie war and get good exercise. Ignorantly win the weight loss battle. 240 turned into steady 195-200 and I eat pretty much whatever I want these days as long as I get to the gym.
 
Last edited:
So a question for all of you. Protein powder. Yay or nay? My son has encouraged me to start using it but I don't work out six days a week two hours at a time. I have heard that it can help lose weight but I thought the idea behind it was to build muscle. 🤷‍♂️
Just my 2 cents but the cheapest protein you can get is eggs and tuna.
If you go the powder route, I'de suggest Pea protein over whey or soy .
 
Little sideway segue. Meant to tell you all sooner, I won't, I repeat I WON'T be running the marathon on Monday. If you bet on me, I'll try to cover your loss.

Cheers and Apologies
 
Little sideway segue. Meant to tell you all sooner, I won't, I repeat I WON'T be running the marathon on Monday. If you bet on me, I'll try to cover your loss.

Cheers and Apologies

Just caught an Adam Sandler flick at my buddies house. There was this really large mamal of a guy in the Marathon. 8000-1 odds. 20 bucks won Adam 160 grand or some shit.

I believe in you. You can do it.

You just have to believe in yourself like R. Freaking Kelly, he went places no man should have ever gone. Look it up. Lol


View: https://youtu.be/8-9KCDxBpT4
 
Yes, definitely. I didn't mean to come across as dictatorial.

I did a ton of reading since the time of the old ketosis thread, and what I learned then and have had driven home to me by recent research and my own experience is that hormones do drive the entire body, including fat storage and burning. If you accept this, then you will see why counting calories doesn't work very well.

We all learned in grade school that the body stores fat to stay nourished when food isn't available, and the body will use this fat when no food is available. The hormone that decides when the body stores fat and when it uses fat is insulin. This process worked to perfection for millennia...until agriculture. Before that point, life was basically feast or famine, so it was easy for insulin to judge: is there food coming into the stomach? If so, then it's time to store fat, and the mechanism to burn body fat was shut off, and the mechanism to store fat was turned on. If the body went 12 to 24 hours (research generally showed the switch point to abut 16 - 18 hours) without eating, then insulin flipped the switches.

The problem with that system is that we now have food available all the time. We rarely hit the point anymore where we regularly don't eat for 16+ hours.

What worked for me over the last 3-4 years is that I went on-and-off of a system of only eating for 4 to 8 hours a day. I brought my weight from the 280's down to the 250's. But I couldn't maintain it and kept falling off the diet, and the weight crept up to a high point of 295. I did NOT want to hit 300, and got very strict with what I ate and when I ate. I found that how much I ate was nearly irrelevant as long as I ate whole foods (not starchy foods like underground veggies) went 20 hours every day without eating. Also, no sugary foods, (including assumed-to-be-healthy foods like honey and most fruits). Two meals a day making sure I finished the second meal no more that four hours after I started the first meal.

I got down into the high 220's and again went back to my old eating patterns. I eat better now but my weight has been creeping up so that this morning I was 262. But I finally figured out the problem. I was giving up something I wanted (bread, most fruit, starchy veggies), and I would 'reward' myself with an occasional pizza or ice cream cone so I always felt deprive and retained the desire to eat the wrong kind of food.

When I quit smoking in 1981 and quit drinking in 1989, it wasn't this way. I simply became (after a couple of years each time) a person who didn't smoke and didn't drink. Regarding food, I am still a person who would enjoy spaghetti and garlic toast, but I can't eat it because I need to lose weight.

What I need to be is a person who doesn't eat crap. I'm not sure I can do it, but I better decide soon, as I'm about to leave soon for 5 weeks of traveling with no kitchen facilities. 5 weeks of restaurant food. I know I can avoid coming home at 300+ pounds, but I don't want to gain anything.

I know what will work for me, Whether or not it works for you depends on whatever.

Oh, and I believe that while losing weight and getting fit are related and both are good for you, I think the processes aren't the same and care must be taken not to ruin one while focusing on the other. (But I still believe I can't outrun your fork. I ran 40-50 miles a week for several years in the 70's and early 80's proving that to myself.)
Oh no, that wasn't a critism of your post. I knew the next things I was going to say might come across that way. You and I have a similar philosophy in this.

I originally did keto about 8 years ago and lost 100 lbs with it. Since then it's gotten more and more dirty and I've put some back on.

So I dove in again into nutrition and the mechanisms behind the different hormones (like insulin like you mentioned), and have a new plan now.

In the last 6 months I have lost the weight that I had slowly gained back from the initial weight loss, but this time I am not going let my diet slip like I did before and I think reaching college age weights is realistic for me.

Physically, I feel better now than I have since I was a teen.
 
I bought this:


Love it. I mountain bike frequently during the spring/summer/fall, and now train with this.

The screen is redunkulous. I ride though the Italian countryside, the streets and along the canals of Amsterdam, etc.
The subscription is free for a year and when that’s up it’s far cheaper than Peloton.

I do quite a bit of band/kettlebell work, but not as much as just riding the bike.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Enjoy!
 
Back
Top