Warren94
Member
Good Protection if the substance abuse are true. Still may draft a wide receiver then late rounds.
Steve1 on 03-11-2007 at 01:55 PM said:Sounds like a Patriots-friendly contract.
And in other news, steve1 would be happy with just a $100,000 bonus
FallingAlice on 03-11-2007 at 03:02 PM said:All of this free agency good news and kudos from the media is starting to make me nervous, frankly.
It's usually the years that we appear to have modest offseasons...where everyone writes the Pats off...that they win the superbowl.
FallingAlice on 03-11-2007 at 04:02 PM said:All of this free agency good news and kudos from the media is starting to make me nervous, frankly.
It's usually the years that we appear to have modest offseasons...where everyone writes the Pats off...that they win the superbowl.
The Colts this year were a perfect example of the same thing. Unlike years before, the Colts weren't blowing everyone away. They looked like they got luck a lot. Appeared to back their way into the playoffs. Ergo...champions.
So as much as I'm giddy over all this in the short term, I'm pessimistic about the long haul.
I wonder if that's because human expectation being what it is...nothing guarantees disappointment more than great expectations and nothing will ensure a pleasant surprise more than low expectations.
Annihilus on 03-11-2007 at 04:18 PM said:...Then again, our QB is busy getting women pregnant, so maybe that will have some kind of deleterious effect on all of this perceived good fortune we've been experiencing.
-JJ- on 03-11-2007 at 04:28 PM said:Not really..it just seems that way at face value. They could save money the last couple years because they remained competitive without mortaging the future. You have to look at the big picture..2001-2009. They could spend (and replace top lost D talent, ie Thomas) precisely because they did manage the cap prior. How much can the colts spend? zero. Yet they're basically the same team the last few years. Worse actually on paper.
This was the year to strike. Because the player, Thomas was there and we had the money. Timing is everything.
They are going for a 3 year championship, at least on paper.
This isn't a one year spend for the SB.
The line is locked up till 09 and it's young. Brady will get older and BB will retire someday.
Think of it as the final push on the 9 year dynasty.
Not saying it will come true..but they're putting the pieces for the opportunity to do so.
Now IS the time
Well if you expect me to cook, I wanna go shopping.FallingAlice on 03-11-2007 at 04:36 PM said:It's a whole lot easier to be the chef of a four-star restaurant if your ingredients are good.
FallingAlice on 03-11-2007 at 04:36 PM said:Yes, of course you're right. It's a whole lot easier to be the chef of a four-star restaurant if your ingredients are good. The Pats have a lot to work with here.
But I have one lingering concern about the "structure" of the Stallworth contract and what it might mean in terms of the cohesivness of the Pats.
According to what I read on ESPN, that contract is designed to make Stallworth really want to "star" in order to use this coming year as a springboard to other things. He's going to want his touches and his yards. On one level, we can assume that this might make Stallworth physically less fragile than in years past. He's got to be in the game in order to shine.
At the same time, the Pats did well with FAs like Dillon coming in because they "wanted to be a piece of the puzzle."
Something about the dynamic of the Stallworth signing suggests to me that maybe the Pats swallowed a poison pill this time.
Wheh!...now that I've convinced myself that I should feel lousy about this, I feel much, much better.
CleatMarks on 03-11-2007 at 11:59 AM said:Well, we can now stretch the field. This will make it difficult for teams to put 8 men in the box against us. That should help our running game.
If memory serves me correctly, I'm pretty sure after they added Dilllon following the 2003 season, they were wire-to-wire favorites....and that turned out fairly well.FallingAlice on 03-11-2007 at 04:02 PM said:It's usually the years that we appear to have modest offseasons...where everyone writes the Pats off...that they win the superbowl.
vinceyoungfan on 03-11-2007 at 09:04 PM said:Congrats on Stallworth. I was hoping the Titans would get him but I heard he wasn't high on our list. oh well.
The Titans just signed our very first FA player. Jesus Christ.
I'm so exited!!! Jesus rocks!
Adams85 on 03-11-2007 at 08:56 AM said:From ESPN.com, Stallworth will be a Pat for the next 6 years.
http://sports-ak.espn.go.com/nfl/index
BREAKING NEWS Alert
Stallworth, Patriots agree to deal
Free-agent receiver Donte' Stallworth has agreed to terms with the Patriots on a six-year contract, a league source tells ESPN.com's Michael Smith. Financial terms are not yet known. The Dolphins, Titans and Eagles also were seeking to sign Stallworth.
shirtsleeve on 03-11-2007 at 08:11 PM said:Sorry VYF.....