you'd know better than anyone about that...Some times you just have to admit you were wrong.
Like prematurely calling the Chiefs a dynasty?Some times you just have to admit you were wrong.
You mean such as with Tyreek Hill?Some times you just have to admit you were wrong.
maybe he's a good blocker...Good riddance!
Nice that he has gone to Chicago. That's always been a great place to be a WR.
Well, what's the likelihood that it's the first or second pick of the 7th round...I mean...Bears, right?Wow! I guess that's better than nothing I guess...
Nah, he was gone no matter what...I would go as far as to say that if we took anyone of the other WRs Brady would likely have stayed.
I would go as far as to say that if we took anyone of the other WRs Brady would likely have stayed.
Johnny one note. Give it a break will you. I bet if I looked at all of your post, you would have posted the same thing 10 times at a minimum.I would go as far as to say that if we took anyone of the other WRs Brady would likely have stayed.
Not sure about that. The issues were really complex and include the handling of Jimmy, the benching of Butler and not getting an extension. I would say the roster was probably last on the list but Brady knew Harry was a disaster from day one.I would go as far as to say that if we took anyone of the other WRs Brady would likely have stayed.
Lol. I love that the Chiefs are now looked at as the second best team behind Buffalo and that many expect there to be a drop off on their offense given the departure of Hill. IIt goes to show you just how hard it is to achieve the level of success the patriots had for two decades.Like prematurely calling the Chiefs a dynasty?
You know what, screw you, if you don't like what I post don't read it. Ass clowns like you aren't the arbiters of thought here.Johnny one note. Give it a break will you. I bet if I looked at all of your post, you would have posted the same thing 10 times at a minimum.
If you can't get over it, get some help.
You are probably correct, but having a young legit weapon here couldn't have hurt the equation. As far as the benching of Butler goes, that's not on Bill, at least in the way many think. From what I understand from some people that "claim to know", is that the entire Butler issue is not at all what people think. Granted I have no way to back this up but, what supposedly happened was that thy thought Butler had a head injury in the week leading up to the Super Bowl, Bill didn't want to put him in the protocol and leaving it in the NFL's Doctors to decide if he could play, then when the team's Doctors revaluated him before the game it was apparent that he still had symptoms and they weren't going to risk his health by putting him on the field. At that point Bill couldn't disclose why because the NFL would be all over him for not previously disclosing the injury, so he called it a "game time decision". If you think about it this makes a great deal of sense, because Butler and no one ever said a word about it, you would think if Bill benched him moments before the biggest game of his life he would have said something negative by now, but he never did and actually came back to the same guy. I can't prove it, but a source close to the situation with real info claims this is exactly what happened and of all the theoretical reasons I've heard, this makes the most sense.Not sure about that. The issues were really complex and include the handling of Jimmy, the benching of Butler and not getting an extension. I would say the roster was probably last on the list but Brady knew Harry was a disaster from day one.
ParanoidPatriot has a point. You do have a one-note theme to your posts and a generally nasty confrontational attitude.You know what, screw you, if you don't like what I post don't read it. Ass clowns like you aren't the arbiters of thought here.
Butler did play one play on special teams. So not sure if a head issue was the reason.You are probably correct, but having a young legit weapon here couldn't have hurt the equation. As far as the benching of Butler goes, that's not on Bill, at least in the way many think. From what I understand from some people that "claim to know", is that the entire Butler issue is not at all what people think. Granted I have no way to back this up but, what supposedly happened was that thy thought Butler had a head injury in the week leading up to the Super Bowl, Bill didn't want to put him in the protocol and leaving it in the NFL's Doctors to decide if he could play, then when the team's Doctors revaluated him before the game it was apparent that he still had symptoms and they weren't going to risk his health by putting him on the field. At that point Bill couldn't disclose why because the NFL would be all over him for not previously disclosing the injury, so he called it a "game time decision". If you think about it this makes a great deal of sense, because Butler and no one ever said a word about it, you would think if Bill benched him moments before the biggest game of his life he would have said something negative by now, but he never did and actually came back to the same guy. I can't prove it, but a source close to the situation with real info claims this is exactly what happened and of all the theoretical reasons I've heard, this makes the most sense.