kellyg3big.jpg
 
And a loosely football related one. This is the black haired chick in that new Miller Lite catfight commercial:

prewitch.jpg
 
Undertaker five-niner,

Since you are new to the rules of PatriotsPlanet in general and the girlie thread in particular I must inform you that the pic in #309 is in violation of our BBS regulations 307-92, subsection 4:

This is a non-smoking forum.

But seriously, while I will allow the minor transgression (there is some shrubbery visible and there appears to be a bit of a nip in the air) I cannot promise that it will not be deleted by some of the other moderators who are "less-moderate" than myself.

Please keep this in mind in the future and thank you for flying PatriotsPlanet.
 
NoRespect said:
Undertaker five-niner,

Since you are new to the rules of PatriotsPlanet in general and the girlie thread in particular I must inform you that the pic in #309 is in violation of our BBS regulations 307-92, subsection 4:

This is a non-smoking forum.

But seriously, while I will allow the minor transgression (there is some shrubbery visible and there appears to be a bit of a nip in the air) I cannot promise that it will not be deleted by some of the other moderators who are "less-moderate" than myself.

Please keep this in mind in the future and thank you for flying PatriotsPlanet.

What's funny is I can't see that picture. It just shows up as a little x, as if the picture can not be displayed. What am I missing?If there is at least a sheer covering on the shrubbery? If so, then see thru should be ok and I must protest. See section 1-069 please of the code.
 
OOps

Sorry...I didn't even notice when I found the picture, I thought everything was covered. I will try to be more careful in the future I suppose. (that is if anyone is actually enjoying any of these postings)


But, seriously, what ARE the guidelines? Do see-through coverings count? I mean that doctored Anna Kournikova pic leaves nothing to the imagination. It certainly shows more than #309, though technically 309 has no covering. So if there is ANY kind of covering is it appropiate?

Not trying to start an argument here, I just don't want to be chastised again :)
 
pookie said:
What's funny is I can't see that picture. It just shows up as a little x, as if the picture can not be displayed. What am I missing?If there is at least a sheer covering on the shrubbery? If so, then see thru should be ok and I must protest. See section 1-069 please of the code.

No, she is completely nude, but her arm covers most of her breast (though I guess the nub on the further one can be seen, though it is in heavy shadow) and a lifted leg covers the interesting area between legs hereto referred as BURBANK.

But it is true that just a LITTLE bit of the top of the hair north of BURBANK can be seen, which I did not notice when I found the picture.

Moderators, feel free to delete if it crosses a line.
 
pookie said:
What's funny is I can't see that picture. It just shows up as a little x, as if the picture can not be displayed. What am I missing?If there is at least a sheer covering on the shrubbery? If so, then see thru should be ok and I must protest. See section 1-069 please of the code.

Your protest is duly noted. However there is no sheer covering on the shrubbery just a small exposed area of underbrush. I might remind you that if you do protest and lose it will cost you a time-out. Article 7 clearly states that there can be no exposed shrubbery and the evidence appears to be indisputable.

She is quite fit though. I could -- as public service -- email you the photo. Do you have a PatriotsPlanet.com email address?

Odd that the photo would show up on some but not all systems? Anyone know why that would be -- Austin perhaps?
 
Originally posted by NR
Your protest is duly noted. However there is no sheer covering on the shrubbery just a small exposed area of underbrush. I might remind you that if you do protest and lose it will cost you a time-out.
If I had a red flag in my sock, I would throw it mightily into this forum for a review and subsequent overturning of the ruling of the moderator!


She is quite fit though. I could -- as public service -- email you the photo. Do you have a PatriotsPlanet.com email address?
Why yes I do.... What a coincidence! That would be pookie@patriotsplanet.com. What a nice new site this is to offer it's members custom email addresses and such!


Odd that the photo would show up on some but not all systems? Anyone know why that would be -- Austin perhaps?
I doubt that Austin has anything to do with my not being able to see the hedging. I think it has more to do with the damn filters and rules on the proxy server here at work.
 
Undertaker #59 said:
No, she is completely nude, but her arm covers most of her breast and a lifted leg covers the interesting area between legs hereto referred as BURBANK.


Unfortunately, Burbank is out of our service area. Don't get me wrong, I think it is a great place and I wouldn't mind spending some time there myself but you can't get to Burbank from here -- to paraphrase an old saying we have here in Vermont.

Fear not, there are many roads that will take you to Downtown Burbank, although they are known to be somewhat congested and it can be a b--tch to park.

The rules, which I did not make up but started over at ChiefsPlanet, are no FULL frontal nudity and obviously it is up to the discretion of the moderators. I am new to the moderatorial scene. I am really just trying to avoid the setting of dangerous precedents -- which you are correct to note (thank you) I have already done with Anna.

I wondered myself whether to post it or not. My feeling is since it is clearly a fake, although a very good fake, it is not purely a photograph but one part photo, one part "art". For the most part I was just having some fun with you.
 
FallingAlice said:
Dear Undertaker:

It is the position of PatriotsPlanet management not to have clear guidelines. This gives us ultimate flexibility and the opportunity to be capricious when we like.

You are right to point out the policy inconsistencies between Kournikova and Post #309. In fact, I'm permitting post #309 because she's a brunette. Had she been a blonde or strawberry blonde she would have been deleted. Until next Tuesday when I may change my mind and permit a TOTALLY nude Anna Kournikova en flagrante with a big balled squirrel.

You just never know with me.

You know what they say about a woman's prerogative.

So, post on. Push the envelope all you like. Generally speaking, we'll look away. If not, we'll delete it. But not, generally, with any malice.

Did I mention that I like your attitude????
 
FallingAlice said:
It is the position of PatriotsPlanet management not to have clear guidelines. This gives us ultimate flexibility and the opportunity to be capricious when we like.

You are right to point out the policy inconsistencies between Kournikova and Post #309. In fact, I'm permitting post #309 because she's a brunette. Had she been a blonde or strawberry blonde she would have been deleted. Until next Tuesday when I may change my mind and permit a TOTALLY nude Anna Kournikova en flagrante with a big balled squirrel.

You just never know with me.

You know what they say about a woman's prerogative.

So, post on. Push the envelope all you like. Generally speaking, we'll look away. If not, we'll delete it. But not, generally, with any malice.

Undertaker:

Hope that cleared it up for you. Basically, do your worst and I will try to keep Alice distracted. They say that on a clear night, you can see all the way to Burbank....


p.s. AbsenceOfMalice: So we pick up where we left off? I think you will like the new Baboon Exhibit over on the beefcake thread.
 
Hawg73 said:
Since our previous girlie thread was deleted in the great newsgroup purge, I am now (after being chastised by FallingAlice) officially starting one. Not sure of the rules but I believe it means no nudity and.....ummmmm.....thats about it as far as I know.

I just thought a reminder of the basics was in order. I believe that the fastest way to lose the Girlie pic thread in its entirety is to show goodies. That's right, goodies. We should all be able to figure that out.

Somebody is going to come down on us for this, it's the way of the world and I'd hate to see the fun spoiled because we pushed too far and I'm not pointing the finger of blame at anybody, but it's just a matter of time the way things are going.

I'm no moderator here, and it's my fault for not copying all the rules from ChiefsPlanet in the initial post, but we all have to understand that this isn't a porno forum and god knows there is plenty of porn to be had out there. Why cross the line here? Let's stick to the babes with some form of clothing and we should be all right. Lecture over, I just don't want to lose this thread entirely as it is a lonnnnnnng offseason and we can have plenty of fun with it the way it is.
 
Since I usually try to get back in stride after a questionable post, I found this little story to share:

"We were playing down in Houston and we're getting killed. Dave Kreig was throwing interceptions all over the place.
I always prided myself in getting downfield and chasing the guy (who intercepted the pass). I' chasing one guy about 30 yards and he runs out of bounds right in front of the Houston cheerleaders. I think to myself,`I can cop a feel on one of these cheerleaders right now.' So I ran through them and grabbed a
cheerleader's boob. That's the kind of stuff that goes through your mind while you're on the field."
Tim Grunhard, former Chiefs center, 810 AM


and here's a photo of Nikki who is allegedly a former Oilers cheerleader. Could it have been her?
 
Re: Re: Official PatriotsPlanet Girlie Pic Thread

Hawg73 said:
I just thought a reminder of the basics was in order. I believe that the fastest way to lose the Girlie pic thread in its entirety is to show goodies. That's right, goodies. (ROFL) We should all be able to figure that out.

Somebody is going to come down on us for this, it's the way of the world....


The Goody Police will git' ya.

Not to mock (well, okay partly to mock) an obviously heartfelt argument that I agree with in principle but who would these people be? :)

In all seriousness, I only brought the issue up to avoid having it get out of hand and then having to overreact later.

There is no doubt that someone will and probably already has (rixxx) posted outright pornography. Alice deleted it and interestingly enough, he has not been back.

Unless I am missing something, the authority to decide what stays and what goes resides with the administrator (Austin), the moderators, and the board community. I don't plan on letting it get out of hand but at the same time I think we can have some fun with it because that is why we are here.

This is after all America! Land of the free, and the home of the brave. (Somewhere quietly, a drum and bugle play.)

Relax and enjoy.
 
Re: Re: Re: Official PatriotsPlanet Girlie Pic Thread

NoRespect said:
The Goody Police will git' ya.

Not to mock (well, okay partly to mock) an obviously heartfelt argument that I agree with in principle but who would these people be? :)

In all seriousness, I only brought the issue up to avoid having it get out of hand and then having to overreact later.

There is no doubt that someone will and probably already has (rixxx) posted outright pornography. Alice deleted it and interestingly enough, he has not been back.

Unless I am missing something, the authority to decide what stays and what goes resides with the administrator (Austin), the moderators, and the board community. I don't plan on letting it get out of hand but at the same time I think we can have some fun with it because that is why we are here.

This is after all America! Land of the free, and the home of the brave. (Somewhere quietly, a drum and bugle play.)

Relax and enjoy.

I know that there is no big brother-like figure that is going to take our birthdays away for showing an erect nipple or two and probably didn't make my point clearly as I should. I am not the least bit offended by nudity or even porno, my point was simply that it probably doesn't belong on here but on a board that is specifically designed for that purpose.

I think that for the long term health of the board, for it to prosper the way it should - that some decorum is not a bad idea and as a member of the message board decided to state my opinion on the topic. I'm not trying to tell anyone what to do, just what I think is best and hope that somebody agrees with me, but that is not necessary for me to state my case. I think it's a reasonable and justifiable position.

We all set a standard here, like it or not and it wouldn't be long (maybe it has already) before somebody joins here and starts posting a XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX*. I can practically guarantee that would be next and I don't need to see that here. Thats what I have MallSluts.com for:thumb:

I am all for fun and have been from the start and have seen nothing here that ever offended me (allright, I saw the baboon's ass - I hate those things), I just have the feeling that if you start allowing blatant nudity that it is going to hurt the site in the long run. KnowwhatImean? Nudge, nudge. Wink, wink.

* Sorry Hawg...that was just a little toooo yeeeewwwyyyy. Unfortunately, we had to edit you for graphic language.

-- More irony from the Council of Moderators.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Official PatriotsPlanet Girlie Pic Thread

Hawg73 said:
I know that there is no big brother-like figure that is going to take our birthdays away for showing an erect nipple or two and probably didn't make my point clearly as I should.

I agree and I am relieved to learn that the nipple police don't really exist. (Nods as good as a wink to a blind man.) I think we want to suggest the goodies but not give them all away to the first kid that shows up at the door looking for some candy. Geez Hawg, now you're making me sound like Miss (Mr) Manners...

As for the baboon butt...this should help get your mind off it.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Official PatriotsPlanet Girlie Pic Thread

Hawg73 said:
We all set a standard here, like it or not and it wouldn't be long (maybe it has already) before somebody joins here and starts posting a XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX*. I can practically guarantee that would be next and I don't need to see that here. Thats what I have MallSluts.com for:thumb:

* Sorry Hawg...that was just a little toooo yeeeewwwyyyy. Unfortunately, we had to edit you for graphic language.

-- More irony from the Council of Moderators.

Alice, would you prefer the term "split-tailed" beaver. Don't tell me it is an endangered species too. :D

First casualty of war: the truth.
 
Back
Top