aloyouis
at least generally aware
Rep x1000. Again, silly thread. But hey it's Monday.
In your humble opinion, right? Caught many peoples eye and caused responses. Not all agree with you.
I don't for instance.
Have a nice day.
Rep x1000. Again, silly thread. But hey it's Monday.
Think about it, O.Z.O. You and Yak are ignoring the obvious: that BB was out-coached on a day the players had a bad game. Bad combination, but 'calling for a loss' as yakkityyak said, is just silly. Did BB tell Hogan to hold if Edelman broke one? Tell Brissett to cough up the ball? Tell Ghost to slice it? Did BB deliberately put in a bad game plan and tell his staff to sabotage the game with bad calls and bad side-line coaching.No. Totally disagree.
While he might not be taking the right path, I think the Yakker is on to something that I've thought in the past myself. There seems to be times where, for whatever reason, BB seems to dial it back some. I'm sure there's a very logical reason behind it.
So, to summarize, some of you are postulating that Bill Belichick was so concerned about what the media would say about Tom Brady, that he deliberately tanked a home division game in week 4?
Don't get me wrong, Belichick's concern for the media's opinion of his team and players is well documented, but this still seems like a stretch.
Think about it, O.Z.O. You and Yak are ignoring the obvious: that BB was out-coached on a day the players had a bad game. Bad combination, but 'calling for a loss' as yakkityyak said, is just silly. Did BB tell Hogan to hold if Edelman broke one? Tell Brissett to cough up the ball? Tell Ghost to slice it? Did BB deliberately put in a bad game plan and tell his staff to sabotage the game with bad calls and bad side-line coaching.
That's too tinfoil hat for me, especially when there is a logical and obvious reason: BB was out-coached, just as he was against the Giants in the 18-1 season. It happens. Just because he isn't perfect doesn't mean he isn't the greatest ever. Lombardi, Walsh, Brown, they all lost games.
Ozo, most people would take that as evidence that he is human.
The idea that an NFL head coach would essentially throw a game against a divisional opponent in week 4 simply to prove some kind of point is ridiculous and we have got to stop starting these threads after the Patriots lose.
I know some of you think he's infailliable and therefore anything that happens must be according to plan but sometimes, even BB loses. Without intending to.
Remember that time the Colts went 2-14 when Manning sat out the year? I'm pretty sure it was at the close of that season that Luck was drafted, right? That was quite the coincidence.
Sure, if and when the Pats go 2-14 the year Brady goes away and we get the first pick in the draft...oh, wait, we have a plan for Brady leaving: having good backup QBs. Your plan was to tank a season.I'm sure you'll also recall how many Patriots fan yelled obscenities at us over the alleged "cheating."
I can only assume that for the sake of consistancy you all will be demanding the Patriots lose a first round pick over the alleged throwing of games and that the appropriate people within the Patriots organization be (figuratively) drawn and quartered by the league.
Sure, if and when the Pats go 2-14 the year Brady goes away and we get the first pick in the draft...oh, wait, we have a plan for Brady leaving: having good backup QBs. Your plan was to tank a season.
And I don't recall people saying you cheated, only that you tanked games like an NBA team trying to make the lottery.
Wut? This is the internet, right? Somebody'd gotta be wrong. Then somebody's gotta get mad, and then someone else has to make a nazi comment.we all have our perspectives...doesn't make us right or wrong.
We're cheating cheaters who cheat. They're bumbling bumblers who bumble.Yet Luck sucks. The Colts don't even cheat as well as the Pats.
[/COLOR]We're cheating cheaters who cheat. They're bumbling bumblers who bumble.
Sure, if and when the Pats go 2-14 the year Brady goes away and we get the first pick in the draft...oh, wait, we have a plan for Brady leaving: having good backup QBs. Your plan was to tank a season.
And I don't recall people saying you cheated, only that you tanked games like an NBA team trying to make the lottery.
LOL. I was over at Colts.com. As I am sure you can imagine it is a dumpster fire. I will just give you some of the thread titles for a good laugh:
1) Okay, now come tell me how we make the playoffs
2) Season is over
3)25% of the way through the season, the Colts are on pace to give up the 4th highest amount of points in league history
4) Imagine being Jim Irsay right now
5) 4th and one and you throw to stone hands
And my personal favorite ... "Protesting This Team."
As always, it is good to be a Pats fan.
I see you trolling.
---------- Post added at 04:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:59 PM ----------
No "Fire Grigson/Pagano!"?
LOL. I was over at Colts.com. As I am sure you can imagine it is a dumpster fire. I will just give you some of the thread titles for a good laugh:
1) Okay, now come tell me how we make the playoffs
2) Season is over
3)25% of the way through the season, the Colts are on pace to give up the 4th highest amount of points in league history
4) Imagine being Jim Irsay right now
5) 4th and one and you throw to stone hands
And my personal favorite ... "Protesting This Team."
As always, it is good to be a Pats fan.
No. But within each thread you will find that sentiment often. Do you still visit there? Seems like so many of the old posters are gone. I don't recognize anyone anymore except for a couple.
Huh? I was serious. Colts had no succession plan...oh, come on. Are you seriously telling me that your front office selected Painter to replace Manning? I know I called your team a bunch of bumblers earlier but even they couldn't have thought that Painter could continue the Colts winning ways.I see you trolling.