easycome_easygo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
- Messages
- 15,110
- Reaction score
- 1,274
- Points
- 113
Brady got my vote.
Keep trying to argue it sweatheart it is cute. Don't despair denial is everywhere. >)TurkishNippl3s on 02-08-2007 at 08:48 AM said:My friends are trying to argue with me that Peyton is better than Brady. I keep telling them 3>1 but they don't listen. They keep saying to look at his stats and I keep saying look at Brady's rings. I know this site isn't filled with all patriots fans so let me know what you think on this topic. I know everybody has an opinion on this subject so hit me up.
I thought it was more performance than size that mattered, if so in that case it would be 6'4" Brady - 3 SB Rings>6'5" Manning 1 SB RingHSanders on 02-09-2007 at 02:59 AM said:Yes, Manning > Brady. Manning is 6'5" and Brady is 6'4".
dred on 02-08-2007 at 11:09 PM said:Rex Grossman > Carson Palmer
That would be Micheal Vick.BY1401 on 02-09-2007 at 09:15 AM said:But who makes a better Long Island?
I hear they are intstalling the wing -THC formation for him too-jaric on 02-09-2007 at 09:22 AM said:That would be Micheal Vick.
And apparently he has been feeding them Arthur Blank (is it blank or black?) intravenously since his arrival.
How else can you explain the falcons deciding to let Vick call his own plays?
DrewWho on 02-10-2007 at 08:41 AM said:Well, right now the edge is with Manning. How could you not give him the edge over Brady?
Brady has got to prove that he can win it all again and be that clutch QB that made him so great. The shine is off Brady right now. He is not even widely considered the 2nd best QB - most put Palmer or even Brees there. 2007 will say alot about Brady and his legacy, but right now, Manning rules this debate!
He is a two time league MVP and now SB MVP. Whether he deserved the SB MVP or not, the record books don't care.
Brick194 on 02-10-2007 at 09:15 AM said:Manning does benefit from having the same quality receivers over consecutive seasons unlike Brady.