chevss454
Data-driven decision-making is science and art.
I mean that speaks to BB doing a good job drafting but the fact that none of the players are currently helping the Pats is also relevant. For Jones they got Thuney (has been OK) and Mitchell (missed all year). The pick they got for Collins was eventually sent to NO for Cooks, which was a good trade, but at the same time they wasted their own 3rd trading for Ealy. So really that's a wash because without the Collins trade they could have traded their own 3rd in the Cooks deal and not bothered with Ealy. Return for Jimmy is TBD.
Not sure I can get that excited about guys who played well on their rookie deals but weren't retained. And on that list you had 2 promising defensive players who were traded for picks that ended up being used to acquire offensive players.
This D has a stunning lack of talent up front and that falls on BB, and isn't offset by making a few decent draft picks.
BB hasn't liked paying grinders a ton of money in the past. VW was the exception but when they want to get paid, he normally trades them as he did Seymour. It's economics. Rookie deals pay off but beyond that paying Chandler Jones $17.5M/ and Jamie Collins $12.5M/ isn't happening with BB. His philosophy of getting good players for 4 years cheaply then letting them make their money somewhere else makes great economic sense to me. I see the value in those 4 rookie years and I'm glad we had them while we did. BB's MO is use them, trade 'em, restock through FA/the draft and move on. He will improve our front 7 this year; he sees what we see. Our LBs, Roberts and Marquis Flowers suck.