Osweiler to Houston

I love how you continue to bring up stuff from the mane. The Broncos are in your head! Pretty funny. Don't forget the Broncos did win the SB with what you all claim as the worst QBing of all SB winners. They will be fine.

I love the Mane. I have been a lurker there for a long time. Never and I mean never have I seen a fanbase more unhappy and at odds with a super bowl victory. The Manninhgh hate there was off the charts. And now the whole fanbase is *trying* to convince themselves that Brock was really not that good anyways despite saying all season he should have started over Manninghg. And that he would have won the SB too. lol.

If you think lightning will strike twice and you can win with putrid QB play two years in a row, more power to you. The implosion of the Broncos this season will be one of the best stories from Sept thru Dec. I just hope Brock lights it up in Houston to twist the knife a little more into Elway.
 
I love how you continue to bring up stuff from the mane. The Broncos are in your head! Pretty funny. Don't forget the Broncos did win the SB with what you all claim as the worst QBing of all SB winners. They will be fine.

OK second worst (70.5) only better than Terry Bradshaw's 68.4 in 1975.

What's hard to understand? 50 Super Bowl winning QB's. Pey Pey is 49th. You must be so proud.
 
He's not done, and the Dirty won't be the starter

Looks like Dirty will indeed be the starter.

Is Mark Sanchez really going to be Denver's quarterback for Week 1?

Think about how weird that question would have seemed to Broncos fans a few months ago. As of right now, Sanchez is really the only viable option on the roster to start for the Broncos when they open the 2016 season on Sept. 8, given that his lone backup is 2015 seventh-rounder Trevor Siemian. It seems impossible that the Broncos could be down to Sanchez, Siemian and the possibility of adding a rookie who might develop as a long-term option in this year's draft.

And yet, at the same time, what else can the Broncos really do? Their best-case scenario might be Kaepernick, but he was a mess in 2015 and would cost the Broncos a valuable draft pick that they might prefer to use on a quarterback of their choosing. (It would be an easier pill to swallow if the 49ers cut Kaepernick.) And if it's not Kaepernick, then who else? Griffin? Fitzpatrick? It's hard to argue that either is significantly more likely to be better than Sanchez in 2016, even if they've been better at times in the past. As frustrating as it might be for Denver fans, the cards have left the Broncos with limited resources at quarterback. It might be more important to get Sanchez as many reps as possible with his new receivers than to bring in another quarterback to compete with him for the starting job.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/1...ions-2016-free-agency-colin-kaepernick-traded
http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=...YufdsSrTxnYh5pWBv2-hirDA&ust=1458827403372559
 
So yackity argument goes like this against most of the planet. Our backup is pretty good named siemien. You don't know what he can do, he's better than Oz and should've start over him. Planet that guy sucks. Yackity: but we won last year with a sorry QB. Face it yackity. Butt fumble is your QB. Your defense will carry your team to another division title or maybe just maybe we will watch this same defense be like every other defense and be good for two quarters before they throw the towel in or get too tired and lose 9 games not because they aren't good but because butt fumble only put up 3 pts in 3 quarters
 
I'd trade a Number Two for Starford. :coffee:

I wonder if any of the Browns players wore 2? (he was the shit)...:coffee:

-2-johnny-manziel-game-jerseycheap-men&39;s-orange-white-game-football-jersey-wholesalebest-qualitystitched.jpg
 
OK second worst (70.5) only better than Terry Bradshaw's 68.4 in 1975.

What's hard to understand? 50 Super Bowl winning QB's. Pey Pey is 49th. You must be so proud.
Don't know what site you're using, but Roethlisberger won a Super Bowl with a 22.5 passer rating.

21 attempts, 9 completions, 123 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs.

Pittsburgh did have a TD pass in that game against Seattle, but it was thrown by Antwaan Randle El.




Edit: Earl Morral in Baltimore's win over Dallas in Super Bowl V also posted a low number: 54.0. However, he didn't start that game, Unitas did. But Johnny's numbers are worse: 15.0 - I used Morrall because he played the majority of the snaps at QB.
 
Don't know what site you're using, but Roethlisberger won a Super Bowl with a 22.5 passer rating.

21 attempts, 9 completions, 123 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs.

Pittsburgh did have a TD pass in that game against Seattle, but it was thrown by Antwaan Randle El.




Edit: Earl Morral in Baltimore's win over Dallas in Super Bowl V also posted a low number: 54.0. However, he didn't start that game, Unitas did. But Johnny's numbers are worse: 15.0 - I used Morrall because he played the majority of the snaps at QB.
Oh yes the SB that was gift wrapped to them.
 
Don't know what site you're using, but Roethlisberger won a Super Bowl with a 22.5 passer rating.

21 attempts, 9 completions, 123 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs.

Pittsburgh did have a TD pass in that game against Seattle, but it was thrown by Antwaan Randle El.




Edit: Earl Morral in Baltimore's win over Dallas in Super Bowl V also posted a low number: 54.0. However, he didn't start that game, Unitas did. But Johnny's numbers are worse: 15.0 - I used Morrall because he played the majority of the snaps at QB.

It was Michael Hurley. I should have known....

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2016/01/...t-super-bowl-winning-quarterback-of-all-time/

BOSTON (CBS) — The one-line summation of Peyton Manning’s Hall of Fame career typically comes across one of two ways, depending largely on where the conversation is taking place.

The statement is either “He does have a Super Bowl title” or it’s “He only has one Super Bowl title.”

It’s a specious endeavor, summing up an entire career based solely on championships in a constantly chaotic sport in which wins can be decided by skill and execution but where so, so much is decided by chance and fortune. But we are sometimes simple people needing simple answers, and so we speak in simplicities. One title. No good. He bad.

Really, the idea that a quarterback wins a title is not generally the best measure. Certainly, the 2007 version of Tom Brady was a much better quarterback than the 2001 version of Tom Brady. 2007 Brady threw for 50 touchdowns and 4,800 yards; 2001 Brady threw for just 18 TDs and 2,843 yards. Both quarterbacks reached the Super Bowl, with the ’07 version throwing for 266 yards and a touchdown; ’01 Brady only threw for 145 yards and a touchdown.

In fact, both quarterbacks delivered go-ahead drives in the final minutes of those Super Bowls, and ’07 Brady even capped it off with a touchdown, whereas ’01 Brady relied on a 48-yard field goal to win the game.

The difference, of course, is that the defense for ’07 Brady didn’t hold the lead. So 2007 Brady didn’t win a title; 2001 Brady did.

This is all to say that a quarterback’s winning a title does not necessarily mean that greatness took place.

ADVERTISING

inRead invented by Teads
With that in mind, the question is raised: Is Peyton Manning the worst quarterback to ever win a Super Bowl?

No — not in that way. Manning is the most prolific passer of all time. He is the all-time leader in passing yards, passing touchdowns and single-season passing touchdowns. He’s set records that will likely stand for some time. He is a historically great quarterback.

But — but! — this is an exercise in which we examine exactly how a Super Bowl-winning quarterback performed during that particular postseason, and for Peyton Manning, it is just not a pretty picture.

In the 2006 postseason, Manning completed 97 of 153 passes (63.4 percent), averaging 259 yards per game while throwing three touchdowns and seven interceptions.

That’s not very good.

In fact, it’s quite bad.

But how bad? Is it the worst Super Bowl-winning performance in history?

The reflexive answer to that question tends to always be Trent Dilfer or Brad Johnson. It could be Jeff Hostetler or Jim Plunkett, depending on the age of the person answering, or it could be Joe Namath or even Terry Bradshaw, depending on the football knowledge of the opining party.

So who is the worst? Let’s look solely at passer rating, a stat that may have its individual flaws but can generally paint a fairly accurate picture of a quarterback’s performance. Here all of the Super Bowl-winning quarterbacks who recorded passer ratings of 100 or below during their postseason runs.

Terry Bradshaw, 1975, 68.4
Peyton Manning, 2006, 70.5
Joe Namath, 1968, 74.2
Johnny Unitas, 1970, 76.3
Tom Brady, 2001, 77.3
Brad Johnson, 2002, 79.9
Len Dawson, 1969, 80.8
Trent Dilfer, 2000, 83.7
John Elway, 1997, 83.9
Tom Brady, 2003, 84.5
Jim Plunkett, 1983, 85.3
John Elway, 1998, 85.9
Bob Griese, 1973, 86.2
Roger Staubach, 1977, 88.3
Joe Montana, 1984, 89.8
Mark Rypien, 1991, 91.2
Ben Roethlisberger, 2008, 91.6
Jeff Hostetler, 1990, 92.5
Doug Williams, 1987, 93.7
Joe Montana, 1981, 94.3
Terry Bradshaw, 1974, 94.9
Bob Griese, 1972, 95.3
Jim Plunkett, 1980, 96.2
Terry Bradshaw, 1979, 98.5
Roger Staubach, 1971, 98.6
Kurt Warner, 1999, 100.0
As you can see, Peyton Manning’s 2006 postseason was the second-worst playoff performance to result in a Super Bowl win in history. The No. 1 distinction belongs to Terry Bradshaw’s 1975 playoff run.

Yet, Terry Bradshaw is not the worst quarterback to win a Super Bowl, because Terry Bradshaw won four Super Bowls. In those other postseason runs, he recorded passer ratings of 94.9, 104.1, and 98.5. And in that not-so-pretty 1975 run, he threw three touchdowns and five interceptions. Manning, you’ll remember, threw three touchdowns and seven interceptions in the 2006 postseason.
 
Don't know what site you're using, but Roethlisberger won a Super Bowl with a 22.5 passer rating. 21 attempts, 9 completions, 123 yards, 0 TDs, 2 INTs. Pittsburgh did have a TD pass in that game against Seattle, but it was thrown by Antwaan Randle El. Edit: Earl Morral in Baltimore's win over Dallas in Super Bowl V also posted a low number: 54.0. However, he didn't start that game, Unitas did. But Johnny's numbers are worse: 15.0 - I used Morrall because he played the majority of the snaps at QB.
SB V the blunder bowl. The only SB in history were the losing team player won the MVP.
 
RG to the Browns.

Looking like Dirty will indeed be the guy in Denver ... lol.
 
RG to the Browns.

Looking like Dirty will indeed be the guy in Denver ... lol.

the opinion on the Mange appears to be to hold out hope for Krapernick...

...you can't make this shit up...ROFL
 
Now they should list the passer ratings per super bowl, rather than the post season run as a whole, and see what the numbers show. :coffee:

Exactly.
BR had two pretty good playoff games IIRC then that craptacular performance in the SB in 05.
PM has to have had 2 of the worst SB runs EVER in recorded history for the winning QB.
 
Elways should just give in. Send them
The 2nd they want for kapernick. The only thing funnier then RG3 starting for Browns . Butt fumble as the Broncos QB.

Besides Kaep not being worth a #2, they can't afford him under the cap and sign Miller. On April 1, Kaep's contract becomes guaranteed and the niners will not deal before then according to Chip.

---------- Post added at 04:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:18 PM ----------

the opinion on the Mange appears to be to hold out hope for Krapernick...

...you can't make this shit up...ROFL

It is glorious, isn't it? :dbanana:

Their other brilliant idea was to trade two #1's for Stafford. Elway has them all doing this right now :party:
 
Besides Kaep not being worth a #2, they can't afford him under the cap and sign Miller. On April 1, Kaep's contract becomes guaranteed and the niners will not deal before then according to Chip.

---------- Post added at 04:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:18 PM ----------



It is glorious, isn't it? :dbanana:

Their other brilliant idea was to trade two #1's for Stafford. Elway has them all doing this right now :party:

Well, to be fair, Stafford >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Butt Fumble and Krapernick
 
Back
Top