The age of the Pat is NOT over. The time of the Chief...has NOT begun.

Share this page

Hogfarmer said:
Well, common sense would tell me that it's unrealistic for a team to be to the Superbowl that many times over a span of twenty years and especially with constant turnover of personnel.
The only thing consistent over that span is they've had the same Head Coach the same QB and the ability to constantly get caught cheating.
Now you look at other teams that had a stable QB/HC situation for example the Steelers. Now why don't they have six rings??

Oh yeah. One of the three things seems to be missing. It's sad that every one of those 6 rings has an asterick beside it.

Now we have Mahomeboy. He's played two years and has broken virtually every single QB record for the first two year period in football.

He took the Chiefs within one play of a SB his first year and got them there his second year while being injured half the year.

I see a real QB/HC team dynasty unfolding and it won't have an asterick attached.
Click to expand...

Dumb...just dumb.
 
bideau said:
You want to bring up cheating bullshit, then you can spend some time in the assclown forum. Post to your heart's content there, but you won't be posting in the main forum for awhile.
Click to expand...
Well done Bid but this was long overdue. :toast:
 
I'm hoping he goes full Dolphin22 insane down there. I used to love that place when it was active.
 
Hogfarmer said:
Well, common sense would tell me that it's unrealistic for a team to be to the Superbowl that many times over a span of twenty years and especially with constant turnover of personnel.

The only thing consistent over that span is they've had the same Head Coach the same QB and the ability to constantly get caught cheating.

Now you look at other teams that had a stable QB/HC situation for example the Steelers. Now why don't they have six rings??



Oh yeah. One of the three things seems to be missing. It's sad that every one of those 6 rings has an asterick beside it.



Now we have Mahomeboy. He's played two years and has broken virtually every single QB record for the first two year period in football.



He took the Chiefs within one play of a SB his first year and got them there his second year while being injured half the year.



I see a real QB/HC team dynasty unfolding and it won't have an asterick attached.
Click to expand...



LOL. The Chiefs won’t keep all of their weapons over the next year or two.
Chiefs’ defense isn’t good enough to form a dynast, and the KC payroll can’t keep all of those weapons. There will be no dynasty in KC. Fact.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
bideau said:
You want to bring up cheating bullshit, then you can spend some time in the assclown forum. Post to your heart's content there, but you won't be posting in the main forum for awhile.
Click to expand...

At some point in most discussions, they will never be able to match the success, so....this is the go to card. Its really all they can do, he cannot put his team or his coach or his QB in that conversation, there isnt an argument, they lapped the field, so, well, we need an excuse. You wonder why the ravens who have been busted 4 times in the last two years, or atlanta, or the vikings, or the browns, or the giants, or anyone else does not get that in an argument...because they have not won enough. Its as simple as that.

ESPN wrote an article that said 10 out of 12 balls, etc...people still bring it up. ESPN wrote an article a few weeks ago and said it was all BS, nobody read it, nobody brought it up, nobody wanted to read it. Hog does not believe that cheating made them what they are, but its easier to say that, than say they were great, that hurts him, as much as it hurts him to say the chiefs lost in the afc title game on their own field to them, so he uses....Ford's fault, forget the other 59 minutes, forget all the things that happened both good and bad, nope...just that. Its sad really.
 
Hogfarmer said:
Well, common sense would tell me that it's unrealistic for a team to be to the Superbowl that many times over a span of twenty years and especially with constant turnover of personnel.
The only thing consistent over that span is they've had the same Head Coach the same QB and the ability to constantly get caught cheating.
Now you look at other teams that had a stable QB/HC situation for example the Steelers. Now why don't they have six rings??

Oh yeah. One of the three things seems to be missing. It's sad that every one of those 6 rings has an asterick beside it.

Now we have Mahomeboy. He's played two years and has broken virtually every single QB record for the first two year period in football.

He took the Chiefs within one play of a SB his first year and got them there his second year while being injured half the year.

I see a real QB/HC team dynasty unfolding and it won't have an asterick attached.
Click to expand...

You mention common sense and then bring up the cheating? Like what exactly? Spygate? ALL filming was banned in week 3 of the 2007 season. The Pats got hit in week 2 of 2007 for filming in an area the NFL deemed off limits, there were still areas that were deemed ok to film from. There was a memo released in April of 2007 by NFL stating that teams could no longer film in areas deemed restricted by the NFL. Prior to that memo, you know what was completely legal? Filming.

Brady's first year as a starter he won a Super Bowl. In fact by year 4 of him as a starter he already had 3 Super Bowls.

Mahomes couldn't wash Brady's jock, he's not worthy. As for The Walrus, still a big fat goose egg for SB wins. He's the new Norv Turner, really good regular season coach, really mediocre post season coach.

But you go on and keep talking about the Chiefs "potential" dynasty.
 
1970Dart said:
You mention common sense and then bring up the cheating? Like what exactly? Spygate? ALL filming was banned in week 3 of the 2007 season. The Pats got hit in week 2 of 2007 for filming in an area the NFL deemed off limits, there were still areas that were deemed ok to film from. There was a memo released in April of 2007 by NFL stating that teams could no longer film in areas deemed restricted by the NFL. Prior to that memo, you know what was completely legal? Filming.

Brady's first year as a starter he won a Super Bowl. In fact by year 4 of him as a starter he already had 3 Super Bowls.

Mahomes couldn't wash Brady's jock, he's not worthy. As for The Walrus, still a big fat goose egg for SB wins. He's the new Norv Turner, really good regular season coach, really mediocre post season coach.

But you go on and keep talking about the Chiefs "potential" dynasty.
Click to expand...
wow, you went there...... wow thats low



its true of course, and funny, well put.
 
Hogfarmer said:
Well, common sense would tell me that it's unrealistic for a team to be to the Superbowl that many times over a span of twenty years and especially with constant turnover of personnel.
The only thing consistent over that span is they've had the same Head Coach the same QB and the ability to constantly get caught cheating.
Now you look at other teams that had a stable QB/HC situation for example the Steelers. Now why don't they have six rings??

Oh yeah. One of the three things seems to be missing. It's sad that every one of those 6 rings has an asterick beside it.

Now we have Mahomeboy. He's played two years and has broken virtually every single QB record for the first two year period in football.

He took the Chiefs within one play of a SB his first year and got them there his second year while being injured half the year.

I see a real QB/HC team dynasty unfolding and it won't have an asterick attached.
Click to expand...

Is anyone surprised that his idiot finally revealed his true colors? By the way idiot, it's asterisk but I wouldn't expect you to know that.
 
1970Dart said:
You mention common sense and then bring up the cheating? Like what exactly? Spygate? ALL filming was banned in week 3 of the 2007 season. The Pats got hit in week 2 of 2007 for filming in an area the NFL deemed off limits, there were still areas that were deemed ok to film from. There was a memo released in April of 2007 by NFL stating that teams could no longer film in areas deemed restricted by the NFL. Prior to that memo, you know what was completely legal? Filming.

Brady's first year as a starter he won a Super Bowl. In fact by year 4 of him as a starter he already had 3 Super Bowls.

Mahomes couldn't wash Brady's jock, he's not worthy. As for The Walrus, still a big fat goose egg for SB wins. He's the new Norv Turner, really good regular season coach, really mediocre post season coach.

But you go on and keep talking about the Chiefs "potential" dynasty.
Click to expand...

you spelled "Marty Schottenheimer" wrong...Queefs fans would be more familiar with the correct spelling. Norv sucked in the regular season as well, classic underachiever.
 
O.Z.O. said:
you spelled "Marty Schottenheimer" wrong...Queefs fans would be more familiar with the correct spelling. Norv sucked in the regular season as well, classic underachiever.
Click to expand...

Schottsy!!!
 
WAIT, YOU CAN BUT JUST PONDER THIS LITTLE TID BIT OF INFORMATION!!!!

The Super Bowl tickets are going to the SF crowd, not the KC crowd because they know in their hearts they are not going to win this game.

see the link

MIAMI — The high prices attached to Super Bowl LIV tickets hasn’t waned. Now the data is beginning to show why.

San Francisco 49ers fans have swamped the market since the NFC title game.

Secondary market titan StubHub collected some staggering data in the first week after the NFL’s championship weekend: As of Monday, Super Bowl ticket sales in California had spiked 206 percent, suggesting a strong swath of buying by 49ers fans. To put that into perspective, that sales acceleration was “3.6 times faster” than the sales spike in Missouri.

Aggregate sales appear to back up that rush of fans, too, with 22 percent of Super Bowl ticket sales coming in California, while Missouri and Kansas (largely representing Kansas City Chiefs fans) has ticked off at 15 percent of the market.
Click to expand...
 
mikiemo83 said:
WAIT, YOU CAN BUT JUST PONDER THIS LITTLE TID BIT OF INFORMATION!!!!

The Super Bowl tickets are going to the SF crowd, not the KC crowd because they know in their hearts they are not going to win this game.

see the link
Click to expand...

might have something to do with the fact that they're a bunch of poor, inbred fucks?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top