O_P_T
Why Be Normal
Apologies if this recent article by Sally Jenkins was already mentioned. It just appeared on the sports page of my local paper.
If you haven't read it, ya gotta:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/spor...003de0-e172-11e5-8d98-4b3d9215ade1_story.html
In it she writes of a 3rd party brief submitted to the court by Legal scholar Robert Blecker. About the best thing I've read on the whole debacle:
"On Thursday, the second-highest court in the land was to hear oral arguments on whether it should affirm or reverse, on narrow procedural grounds, District Judge Richard Berman’s decision to throw out Goodell’s four-game suspension of Brady. But a little-noticed and powerfully written third-party brief by renowned legal scholar Robert Blecker lays out a third option for the court to consider. Blecker argues that the court should find Goodell’s arbitration process was “infected with bias, evident partiality, unfairness and fraud,” and he doesn’t stop there.
He makes the delightfully explosive suggestion that the appellate court could remand the case to Berman and order the NFL to share its investigative files — which were withheld from Brady’s team during the hearing process, denying him the basic fairness of knowing what the supposed evidence against him was. There are major questions as to whether the league guided the so-called independent investigation and whether Goodell was truly an honest, unbiased arbiter."
The article just gets better from there. So, PFL and other legal eagles, how much influence do 3rd party briefs typically have on judges? Or does it depend on what their clerks emphasize?
Here's Blecker's Brief.