Smudger
Registered Loser
P4E* on 10-18-2007 at 04:49 PM said:
*P4E Waves his Fist At Caroline*
"Bitch,Dont Make Me Come Over there"
See, you're basically married already!
P4E* on 10-18-2007 at 04:49 PM said:
*P4E Waves his Fist At Caroline*
"Bitch,Dont Make Me Come Over there"
chiefsgal* on 10-18-2007 at 03:34 PM said:sometimes I wish they would try......>) o
Claremonster on 10-18-2007 at 06:45 PM said:What exactly would you do? Would it be hot? If so, can I try?
chiefsgal* on 10-18-2007 at 03:52 PM said:I don't think my answer is safe for this board..... just use your imagination....
Canadian on 10-18-2007 at 04:59 PM said:We have spawned two wonderful children from this experience
Bushy T Beaver on 10-18-2007 at 06:58 PM said:I knew it! You're a salmon.
JD10367 on 10-18-2007 at 06:21 PM said:I voted "No".
-- If you think it's a "waste of time", then you probably shouldn't be thinking about it.
-- Not sure how it's a "waste of money" unless you're referring to the wedding itself... in which case, just do it cheaply. It's certainly not a waste of money to pool salaries, or get a tax break (albeit not a large one).
-- As for the argument, "Half of all marriages will end in divorce", my response would be, "Then half of all people getting married probably shouldn't be." I think too many people rush into it. I mean, really, how long does it take to get to know someone? I say a couple of years, at LEAST. People getting married after knowing each other for a month or two is just whacked, IMO. The way I look at it, someone can lie for a few months, but it's REALLY hard to lie for a few years, so eventually you'll figure out he/she is a cheat, a thief, an abuser, a drunk, etc,.. (or simply is a decent person but just isn't the right one for you).
JD10367 on 10-18-2007 at 04:21 PM said:I voted "No".
-- If you think it's a "waste of time", then you probably shouldn't be thinking about it.
-- Not sure how it's a "waste of money" unless you're referring to the wedding itself... in which case, just do it cheaply. It's certainly not a waste of money to pool salaries, or get a tax break (albeit not a large one).
-- As for the argument, "Half of all marriages will end in divorce", my response would be, "Then half of all people getting married probably shouldn't be." I think too many people rush into it. I mean, really, how long does it take to get to know someone? I say a couple of years, at LEAST. People getting married after knowing each other for a month or two is just whacked, IMO. The way I look at it, someone can lie for a few months, but it's REALLY hard to lie for a few years, so eventually you'll figure out he/she is a cheat, a thief, an abuser, a drunk, etc,.. (or simply is a decent person but just isn't the right one for you).
mgoblue101415 on 10-18-2007 at 08:01 PM said:A woman I worked with met her husband on a Wed. He was going on a bike trip that weekend and asked her to go with, and she did. Three weeks later they were married. That was 40 years and 4 kids ago and they are still happily married. :shrug:
I think it's odd that people need so much time before deciding to get married. I mean, if you're not sure after 3 years that this is the person for you, then it probably isn't.
I mean, the statistics show that people who are together for longer periods of time before getting married, are more likely to get divorced than those who were together only a couple years before getting married.
And MPN.... If two people are together, whether they're married or living together happily, then really what's the difference when it comes to having kids? It's still a two parent home. Does it really make a difference on parenting if there isn't a piece of paper saying they're married? I do agree that a two parent home is better in the majority of cases, but whether they're married or simply living together really doesn't make a difference, IMO.
mgoblue101415 on 10-18-2007 at 05:01 PM said:
I think it's odd that people need so much time before deciding to get married. I mean, if you're not sure after 3 years that this is the person for you, then it probably isn't.
patsload on 10-18-2007 at 05:03 PM said:I proposed to my wife 2 months after meeting her and we were married 6 months later
that was 15 years ago....
Jh on 10-18-2007 at 08:13 PM said:I really think that is so beautiful wuv. But you have to admit, that really isn't always the best decision. I guess there are people that rush into it just to be married (that's why I think a woman pressuring a man is the worst and stupidest decision evah) and then there are people who just "know".
I was with a dude for 3 years, he was in the military during the time. I went out there a couple of summers for a month and the more I was around him the more I realized he did all the little things that irritate me, things that I couldn't notice in letters and phone calls.
My husband now, well we just went at it for a couple of months and found out I was pregnant and then decided that we were cool enough with each other and we should be able to make it work. Married 6.5 years with 5 kids. And couldn't be happier.
So I guess it varies No set standard. Marriage goes to shit when people stop respecting each other. There is no reason why it can't be as great as when you first got together.
patsload on 10-18-2007 at 07:17 PM said:yeah we just "knew" and I wouldn't suggest it's the best idea unless you feel really strongly about it. We still have a ball together
This statistic is a bit misleading, because many people get married/divorced multiple times.Celtsox34x on 10-18-2007 at 03:17 PM said:more than half of all married couples will devorce.
tmack on 10-18-2007 at 08:37 PM said:That's too bad. What happened to the other one?
patsload on 10-18-2007 at 07:41 PM said:we don't talk about that