I want to beat people for using the terms...

Share this page

TheColtGuy said:
I'm always kind of amazed at how many on the internet still use "loose" instead of "lose."
Click to expand...

Your = possesion, ie your bike.

You're = You are, ie You're a loser.

Let's get a couple of folks here fired up....

resign = to voluntarily give up your position

re-sign = to sign a new contract with someone you already have under contract.
 
Darth Despot said:
Your = possesion, ie your bike.

You're = You are, ie You're a loser.

Let's get a couple of folks here fired up....

resign = to voluntarily give up your position

re-sign = to sign a new contract with someone you already have under contract.
Click to expand...

There
Their
They're
 
Lead (the verb) is present tense. Rhymes with bead.
Led (the verb) is past tense. Rhymes with bed.

I see professional writers get this one wrong all the time. :banghead:
 
Supposively.

For all intensive purposes.

Chicargo

Philadelthia.

Birfday.

Let me axe you a question.
 
Darth Despot said:
Your = possesion, ie your bike.

You're = You are, ie You're a loser.

Let's get a couple of folks here fired up....

resign = to voluntarily give up your position

re-sign = to sign a new contract with someone you already have under contract.
Click to expand...

I've seen something like the following way too many times, and it always makes me wonder if universal suffrage is still a good idea:

"Your a looser. You prolly live in you're moms basement, to!"

My other anti-favorite is when sports announcers say something like "the Bruins and Canadiens will face each other in the decisive game of their seven-game playoff series tonight."

Sorry, dude, until it is played, it's a deciding game. Tomorrow, you can announce that the Bruins won a decisive victory over the Canadiens by beating them 6-2 in Game Seven. :Lecture:
 
sprocketboy said:
Not getting the Oreo reference ... was that yet another one of Peyton's myriad of ad campaigns?

I vaguely remember George Carlin having a bit about flammable, inflammable, and non-inflammable. "Either the thing flamms, or it doesn't!!!" :fire:
Click to expand...

Worse, it was both Mannings

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FUu3alRbbGo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
O_P_T said:
Worse, it was both Mannings

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/FUu3alRbbGo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Click to expand...

I think it's hysterical that they both have name plates in front of them.
 
He's out with a knee (insert body part)

~Dee~
 
Something "needs" something without the "to be" in the verb phrase. I.E. "the car needs cleaned".
Also I'm pretty sure use of "supposably" as mentioned above is a capital crime. Or it is in my house. Rare is the time I correct anyone's speech, BUT I CANNOT STAND "SUPPOSABLY" ARGH!!! I DELETED IT FROM MY HUSBAND'S VOCABULARY...FINALLY. IT IS GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE!

"conversate"-had a friend at my old job who hated this one too.
I second "for all intensive purposes" as horrible too.

"UNTRACKED"..OMG... also a capital crime. THERE.IS. NO.SUCH.THING. NOT.IN.'MURICA.

It is ON TRACK, ON TRACK ON TRACK, you ignorant boogermuffin!!!!!
 
HSanders said:
"conversate"-had a friend at my old job who hated this one too.
I second "for all intensive purposes" as horrible too.

"UNTRACKED"..OMG... also a capital crime. THERE.IS. NO.SUCH.THING. NOT.IN.'MURICA.

It is ON TRACK, ON TRACK ON TRACK, you ignorant boogermuffin!!!!!
Click to expand...

These two items, yes, yes, and a thousand time yes!

Sent from the moon using lasers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top